An AI-driven Approach to Improve the Adjudication Landscape in CBIC
Authors
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics (Deemed to be University), Pune (India)
Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics (Deemed to be University), Pune (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800112
Subject Category: Artificial Intelligence
Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 1557-1565
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-04
Accepted: 2026-09-09
Published: 2026-09-19
Abstract
The quasi-judicial role of Indian Revenue Service (Customs & Indirect Taxes) officers is a unique feature of India’s fiscal administration, as laws such as the Central Excise Act, 1944, Customs Act,1962, Service Tax (Finance Act, 1994) and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 vest them with statutory authority to issue show-cause notices, conduct adjudicatory proceedings including personal hearings, evaluate documentary and electronic evidence, and pass reasoned orders involving classification, valuation, exemption eligibility, and tax or duty demands, penalties, and confiscation.
Unlike generalist administrative services where quasi-judicial functions are intermittent and closely embedded within executive governance, Customs and GST officers perform adjudication as a specialized and continuous function requiring deep technical knowledge of tariff law, international trade, and indirect tax jurisprudence. Their decisions are subject to a structured appellate hierarchy—culminating in the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) and the GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), as applicable, and constitutional courts. This quasi-judicial role has, over the years, come under increasing scrutiny as a result of the Department’s adjudication success rate in higher forums. This paper seeks to analyse in detail the reasons for the poor success rate of the Department’s adjudication orders in higher forums and prescribe suitable solutions to improve the same. In particular, considering the widespread adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the legal space, it is believed that the use of AI in adjudication can radically alter the Department’s success rate in judicial forums, thereby leading to a cascading of positive outcomes for officers.
Keywords
GST, Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax, Adjudication, CESTAT, GSTAT, Show Cause Notice, Artificial Intelligence, Appeal, Evidence
Downloads
References
1. Kabir, Md Shahin & Nazmul Alam, Mohammad. (2023). The Role of AI Technology for Legal Research and Decision Making. 10. 2395-0056. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Woxsen University. (2023). Exploring the use of AI in legal decision making: Benefits and ethical implications. Woxsen University. https://woxsen.edu.in/research/white-papers/exploring-the-use-of-ai-in-legal-decision-making-benefits-and-ethical-implications/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Sonali. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Challenges, opportunities and its impact on society with respect to law and legal field. International Journal of Law, Justice and Jurisprudence, 4(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.22271/2790-0673.2024.v4.i2c.146. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Study report on enhancing quality of adjudication process by Director General of Goods & Service tax , a detailed nationwide study vide OM F.No,CBIC-20010/41/2025 dated 24.06.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. "Understanding Artificial Intelligence in Tax and Customs Administration" Authors: Joshua Aslett, Ignacio Gonzalez, David Hadwick, Stuart Hamilton, Michael Hardy, and Azael Pérez. Published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. "Artificial Intelligence in Tax Administration: Enhancing Compliance, Transparency, and Ethical Governance" Author: Antonio Lopo Martinez."AI in tax administration: Governing with Artificial Intelligence" Source: Published as an official report by the OECD (2025). "Machine Learning Models for Fraud Detection in Tax Systems: Implications for Governance and Policy" Author: Kennedy Samuel. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. "Leveraging Machine Learning for Tax Fraud Detection and Risk Scoring in Corporate Filings" Source: Published in the ABR Journal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Artificial Intelligence in Tax Compliance and Evasion Mitigation" Source: A comprehensive systematic literature review published in MDPI (2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. "Algorithms and Trustworthiness in Tax Administration" Source: Published in the Review of International and European Economic Law (RIEEL, 2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of AI Tools on Student Learning
- Repogent: An Autonomous Multi-Agent System for End-To-End Repository Maintenance
- Trust-Centric Federated Learning Using Blockchain-Enabled Smart Contracts: An Analysis of Data Privacy, Model Integrity, and Decentralized AI Governance
- Can AI Care? Rethinking Ethics, Clinical Integrity, and Professional Responsibility in the Digital Age of Mental Healthcare
- AI-Based Smart Irrigation System Using IoT and Machine Learning for Precision Agriculture