00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

An Integrated Multivariate Statistical Framework for Uncovering Sectoral Heterogeneity and Classifying Economic Performance in Emerging Economies

Authors

Bassey E. Effiong

Dept. of Statistics, University of Calabar, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Maxwell A. Ijomah

Dept. of Maths/Statistics, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900036

Subject Category: Statistics

Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 450-458

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-29

Accepted: 2026-09-03

Published: 2026-10-03

Abstract

This study examines sectoral segmentation and classification in emerging economies using a multivariate analysis framework. The study focuses on selected economic indicators, including gross domestic product (GDP), transport and communication, education, agriculture and natural resources, health, investment, government expenditure, employment, and tourism. Factor Analysis (FA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), K-Means clustering, Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and correlation analysis were employed to identify underlying dimensions, segment observations according to economic characteristics, and evaluate the distinctiveness of the resulting groups. The results indicate that the data are suitable for factor analysis, with a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of 0.620 and a statistically significant Bartlett's Test of Sphericity (χ² = 130.674, p < 0.001). Factor analysis identifies a dominant economic development dimension strongly associated with GDP, investment, government expenditure, and transport. Similarly, the first three principal components explain 87.75% of the total variance, with the first component accounting for 40.89%. K-Means clustering produces three distinct groups representing relatively high-, moderate-, and low-performing economic profiles. Linear Discriminant Analysis achieves an overall classification accuracy of 86%, indicating meaningful separation among the identified groups. Furthermore, employment and tourism exhibit a moderate positive relationship (r = 0.54). The findings demonstrate that multivariate techniques provide complementary insights into the structural heterogeneity of economic sectors in emerging economies. However, given the relatively small number of observations, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory. Future studies should validate the identified segmentation using larger datasets, alternative clustering criteria, and independent or cross-validated classification procedures.

Keywords

Sectoral segmentation; emerging economies; multivariate analysis; factor analysis; principal component analysis; cluster analysis; discriminant analysis; economic development.

Downloads

References

1. Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Azenui, N. B. (2024). Why is labor in the SSA LDCs moving from one low productivity sector to another? European Journal of Development Research, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-023-00599-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cook, S., & Rani, U. (2023). Platform work in developing economies: Can digitalisation drive structural transformation? International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Erumban, A. A., & de Vries, G. J. (2024). Structural change and poverty reduction in developing economies. World Development, 181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Etuk, E. H. (2021). Cluster analysis of Nigerian real GDP. Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(1), 119–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gupta, I. (2024). The rise of business services and structural transformation in India, Kenya and South Africa: Role of female labour supply. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Huberty, C. J., & Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Inklaar, R., Marapin, R., & Gräler, K. (2024). Tradability and sectoral productivity differences across countries. IMF Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-024-00271-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Labour Organization. (2024). The centrality of structural transformation. International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Monetary Fund. (2023). Regional economic outlook: Sub-Saharan Africa—The big funding squeeze. International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), Article 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ketu, I., & Ningaye, P. (2024). Sectoral employment shares shape economic complexity: Empirical evidence from African countries. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 16(2), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101231169857 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Konings, J., Sagyndykova, G., Subramanian, V., & Volckaert, A. (2023). The granular nature of emerging market economies: The case of Kazakhstan. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 31(2), 429–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kumar, R. (2023). Global value chains and structural transformation: Evidence from the developing world. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.05.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nguyen, H., & Pienknagura, S. (2024). Rising temperature, heterogeneous effects: Evidence from seasonal and sectoral data (IMF Working Paper No. 2024/202). International Monetary Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2024). OECD compendium of productivity indicators 2024. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b96cd88a-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ogbuabor, J. E., Agu, C., Onah, B. U., & Urama, C. E. (2025). Economic complexity and sectoral performance in Africa: The role of economic governance institutions. Sustainable Development, 33, 4557–4576. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9122-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development (13th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tsoulfidis, L., & Athanasiadis, I. (2022). A new method of identifying key industries: A principal component analysis. Journal of Economic Structures, 11, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-022-00261-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Bank. (2023). Global economic prospects, June 2023. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1954-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.