Antimutagenic, Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Evaluation of Selected Seed Oils: Potential Application for Skin Cancer Chemoprevention
Authors
Department of Biochemical Science, The Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Biochemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Biochemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Biochemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Biochemistry, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Chemical Sciences, Dominion University Ibadan, Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150700052
Subject Category: Anti-inflammatory
Volume/Issue: 15/7 | Page No: 631-643
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-26
Accepted: 2026-07-31
Published: 2026-08-08
Abstract
Background: Skin cancer is a major global health concern driven by ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced DNA damage, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation. Targeting these interconnected processes is critical for effective chemoprevention. This study aimed to evaluate the antimutagenic, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory potential of selected seed oils (Citrullus lanatus, Cocos nucifera, and Vitellaria paradoxa) and to explore their relevance in mitigating key pathways involved in skin carcinogenesis.
Methods: Seed oils were extracted using Soxhlet extraction and assessed using established in vitro assays. Antimutagenic activity was determined using the Ames test with -Ve-His-Salmonella typhimurium. Antioxidant capacity was evaluated via 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, hydroxyl radical scavenging, and lipid peroxidation inhibition assays. Anti-inflammatory activity was determined by protein denaturation and proteinase inhibition assays. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA at P < 0.05.
Results: The results demonstrated significant, concentration-dependent biological activities across all oils. Citrullus lanatus seed oil exhibited the strongest antimutagenic effect, reducing revertant colonies to 32.0 ± 1.41(75.18% inhibition) at 2.5% compared to 130 ± 19.79 in the positive control. In antioxidant assays, Cocos nucifera seed oil showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity (73.03% at 125 µml/ml; IC₅₀ = 144.1 µml/ml), while Citrullus lanatus oil demonstrated superior hydroxyl radical scavenging (45.65% at 125 µml/ml) and lipid peroxidation inhibition (55.58%). Anti-inflammatory assays revealed strong inhibition of protein denaturation, with Citrullus lanatus oil reaching 91.78% at 125 µml/ml, alongside notable proteinase inhibition (56.19%). Vitellaria paradoxa showed moderate but consistent activity across all assays.
Conclusion: The studied seed oils exhibit multi-targeted chemopreventive properties, acting through suppression of mutagenesis, attenuation of oxidative stress, and modulation of inflammatory responses. Citrullus lanatus seed oil demonstrated the most consistent and potent activity, highlighting its potential as a promising natural agent for skin cancer prevention.
Keywords
Skin carcinogenesis; Chemoprevention; Vitellaria paradoxa; Cocos nucifera; His-Salmonella typhimurium; Citrullus lanatus.
Downloads
References
1. Adebayo, M.A., Adedosu, O.T., Badmus, J.A., Olagoke, E.O., Babalola, O.O., Afolabi, D.O. and Akinboro, J.A. (2026) 'Bioactive seed oil compounds targeting dihydroorotase for skin cancer management via in-silico, IOSR Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry (IOSR-JBB), 12(3), Series II, pp. 08-20. Available at: www.iosrjournals.org. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Atanasov, A. G., Zotchev, S. B., Dirsch, V. M., and Supuran, C. T. (2021). Natural products in drug discovery: Advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 20(3), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ayala, A., Muñoz, M. F., and Argüelles, S. (2014). Lipid peroxidation: Production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2014, 360438. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/360438 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., and Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 28(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cadet, J., and Douki, T. (2018). Formation of UV-induced DNA damage contributing to skin cancer development. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 17(12), 1816–1841. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7PP00395A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dagogo-Jack, I., and Shaw, A. T. (2018). Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 15(2), 81–94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Parkin, D. M., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., and Bray, F. (2021). Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. International Journal of Cancer, 149(4), 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ganesan, K., Sukalingam, K., and Xu, B. (2018). Impact of consumption and cooking manners of vegetable oils on cardiovascular diseases. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 71, 132–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Greten, F. R., and Grivennikov, S. I. (2019). Inflammation and cancer: Triggers, mechanisms, and consequences. Immunity, 51(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.06.025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Jomová, K., Raptova, R., Alomar, S. Y., Alwasel, S. H., Nepovimova, E., Kuca, K., and Valko, M. (2023). Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and human disease. Archives of Toxicology, 97(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03387-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Liu, H. M., Cheng, M. Y., Xun, M. H., Zhao, Z. W., Zhang, Y., Tang, W., Cheng, J., Ni, J., and Wang, W. (2023). Possible mechanisms of oxidative stress-induced skin cellular senescence, inflammation, and cancer and the therapeutic potential of plant polyphenols. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3755. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Liu, R. H. (2020). Health-promoting components of fruits and vegetables in the diet. Advances in Nutrition, 11(3), 586–599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Marina, A. M., Man, Y. B. C., Nazimah, S. A. H., and Amin, I. (2009). Antioxidant capacity and phenolic acids of virgin coconut oil. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 60(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480701548975 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mortelmans, K., and Zeiger, E. (2000). The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation Research, 455(1–2), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00064-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nowsheen, S., Aziz, K., Kryston, T. B., Ferguson, N. F., and Georgakilas, A. (2012). The interplay between inflammation and oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Current Molecular Medicine, 12(6), 672–680. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Orsavova, J., Misurcova, L., Ambrozova, J. V., Vicha, R., and Mlcek, J. (2015). Fatty acid composition of vegetable oils and its contribution to dietary energy intake and dependence of cardiovascular mortality on dietary intake of fatty acids. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(6), 12871–12890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Pinto, M. M. M., Sousa, E., and Vale-Silva, L. (2023). Natural products in skin cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Molecules, 28(3), 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rinnerthaler, M., Bischof, J., Streubel, M. K., Trost, A., and Richter, K. (2015). Oxidative stress in aging human skin. Biomolecules, 5(2), 545–589. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom5020545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Shahidi, F., and Ambigaipalan, P. (2015). Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: Antioxidant activity and health effects. Journal of Functional Foods, 18, 820–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Singh, R., Sharma, P., and Gupta, V. (2023). Application of Ames test in evaluating mutagenicity of natural compounds. Toxicology Reports, 10, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.02.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sporn, M. B. (2022). Approaches to prevention of epithelial cancer during the preneoplastic period. Cancer Research, 82(3), 351–356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., and Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Vasan, N., Baselga, J., and Hyman, D. M. (2019). A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature, 575(7782), 299–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]