00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Comparative Performance Evaluation of Multi-Turn Helical Antennas in Axial and Normal Modes for 5G and 6G Wireless Applications

Authors

Idowu Sunday Adegoke

Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Adewumi Adebayo Segun

Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Olabisi, Olusegun

Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Azeez, Ibraheem Abiodun

Department of Physics, Emmanuel Alayande University of Education, Oyo, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Ogobor Efua Anthony

Physical and Life Science Division, National Space Research and Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Eleyele, Dolapo Emmanuel

Department of Physics, University of Ilesa, Ilesa, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800031

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 452-464

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-13

Accepted: 2026-08-18

Published: 2026-09-05

Abstract

Helical antennas can operate in axial and normal radiation modes, but their comparative performance across multiple turn counts and 5G/6G frequency bands remains insufficiently characterised. This study used full-wave electromagnetic simulation to compare both modes across low-, mid- and high-frequency bands. Helical antennas with two to eight turns were designed in Ansys HFSS Student Version 2025 R2 and evaluated at 3.5, 4.7, 28, 39, 110 and 300 GHz. The resulting 84 turn-frequency-mode cases were assessed using realised gain, axial ratio, return loss, voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) and impedance bandwidth. In axial mode, the three-turn antenna produced the highest gain of 15.63 dB at 300 GHz. The two-turn antenna achieved the lowest axial ratio of 0.55 dB at 39 GHz and the widest bandwidth of 32.32 GHz at 300 GHz. In normal mode, the three-turn antenna provided the best impedance matching, with S11 of −57.89 dB and VSWR of 1.00 at 3.5 GHz. The findings show that the preferred turn count depends on the frequency band and performance objective. Normal-mode antennas with two to four turns are recommended for low-band 5G, axial-mode antennas with three to six turns for mid-band and millimetre-wave links, and axial-mode antennas with two to three turns for sub-terahertz systems. These results provide practical guidance for selecting helical antenna mode and turn count for 5G and emerging 6G applications.

Keywords

Helical antenna, 5G/6G wireless communication, axial-mode radiation, normal-mode radiation, HFSS simulation.

Downloads

References

1. Adewumi, A. S., Eleyele, D. E., Alagbe, A. G., & Azeez, I. A. (2024). Design, simulation and performance evaluation of helical antenna for 4G and 5G mobile networks compliance. Acta Electronica Malaysia, 8(2), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.26480/aem.02.2024.39.44 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alexiou, A., Debbah, M., Di Renzo, M., Calvanese Strinati, E., & Viswanathan, H. (2023). Guest editorial: Beyond Shannon communications—a paradigm shift to catalyze 6G. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 41(8), 2299–2305. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2023.3288796 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balanis, C. A. (2016). Antenna theory: Analysis and design (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Balanis, C. A., & Ioannides, P. I. (2022). Introduction to smart antennas. Synthesis Lectures on Antennas, 2(1), 1–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01686-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, Z., Hu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, G., & Guo, C. (2021). Compact normal-mode hybrid-helix antenna and its application to circularly polarised Yagi array. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 69(9), 5986–5991. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2021.3069542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Faruk, N., Sowande, O. A., Adediran, Y. A., Bello, O. W., Ayeni, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Popoola, S. I., & Oloyede, A. A. (2022). Spectrum for 5G in Nigeria: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access, 10, 85359–85370. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3198224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghosh, P., & Harackiewicz, F. (2022). 3D-printed low-profile strip-based helical antenna. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C, 127, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERC22101506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hajiyat, Z. R. M., Ismail, A., Sali, A., & Hamidon, M. N. (2024). High-performance THz metallic axial mode helix antenna with optimised truncated hollow cone ground plane for 6G wireless communication system. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 32(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.32.1.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, G., & Lu, M. (2026). Research progress on 6G communication antenna technology. Electronics, 15(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15061173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nwalozie, G. C., Okoye, N. C., Eze, E. M., & Okafor, N. C. (2023). Prospects and challenges of 5G network deployment in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 42(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i1.13 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Oladele, T. A., Adebayo, S. M., & Okonkwo, O. (2025). Comparative performance of normal and axial mode helix antennas for 6G applications. Nigerian Journal of Electromagnetics and Communication, 18(2), 115–127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Parsche, F. E. (2023). A new axial-mode helix antenna: The Archimedean screw antenna. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference (WAMICON), Melbourne, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/WAMICON57636.2023.10124885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tawk, Y. (2020). A dynamic dual tapered 3D-printed nested helical antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 68(2), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2019.2943427 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Yousef, B. M., Ameen, A. M., Alanazi, M. D., Rajagopal, M., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2023). A wide-band antenna with circular polarization utilizing a U-shaped radiator and parasitic strip for wireless communications. Micromachines, 14(7), 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14071308 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yudhotomo, U. S., Gunadi, G. I., Khaerudin, K., & Siahaan, T. (2023). 2.22 GHz S-band helical antenna design for earth surveillance LAPAN-TUBSAT data acquisition in Indonesia regional security. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(1), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i1.948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zeain, M. Y., Abu, M., Zakaria, Z., Al-Gburi, A. J. A., Syahputri, R., Toding, A., & Sriyanto. (2020a). Design of a helical antenna for next-generation wireless communication. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 96(11), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.15199/48.2020.11.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zeain, M. Y., Abu, M., Zakaria, Z., Al-Gburi, A. J. A., Syahputri, R., Toding, A., & Sriyanto. (2020b). Design of a wideband strip helical antenna for 5G applications. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 9(5), 1958–1963. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v9i5.2055 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. All rights reserved. ISSN 2278-2540.