Design Thinking-Based Chemistry Instruction for Concept Application and Problem-Solving Skills Among Secondary School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study Protocol | IJLTEMAS
00
Days
00
Hrs
00
Min
00
Sec
Submit Your Paper

Design Thinking-Based Chemistry Instruction for Concept Application and Problem-Solving Skills Among Secondary School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study Protocol

Authors

M. SHABANA, M.Sc., M.Ed., Ph.D.

Research Scholar, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)

Dr. R. Meenakshi, Ph.D.

Research Supervisor, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)

Dr. S. Poonguzhali, Ph.D.

Co-Research Supervisor, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900149

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2974-2981

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-29

Accepted: 2026-10-05

Published: 2026-10-23

Abstract

Background. Secondary chemistry requires students to transfer concepts to unfamiliar situations, interpret evidence and construct explanations. A structured design-thinking process may provide repeated opportunities to practise these behaviours.
Aim. To evaluate, in a prospective school-based study, whether a six-week design thinking-based chemistry programme improves concept application and problem-solving skills compared with conventional chemistry instruction.
Methods. This protocol describes a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test comparison-group study among secondary school students. The intervention consists of six weekly cycles involving understanding a context, defining a chemistry problem, generating alternatives, developing a solution, testing evidence and revising the solution. The primary outcomes will be scores on a Concept Application Test (CAT) and a Problem-Solving Skills Test (PSST). The instruments will undergo expert review, pilot testing, reliability assessment and rubric-based scorer training before the main study. The sample size will be determined a priori using a formal power calculation. Baseline-adjusted post-test comparisons will account for clustering by class or teacher where applicable.
Expected contribution. The study is designed to provide empirical evidence on a clearly specified, chemistry-specific design-thinking intervention. No synthetic or simulated observations are presented as study findings in this protocol

Keywords

design thinking; chemistry education; secondary school; concept application; problem-solving; active learning; study protocol

Downloads

References

1. Yu Q, Yu K, Lin R. A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11:742. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03237-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. He X, Xiong H, Peng K, Xie J. How does design thinking promote STEM learning? Meta-analysis of learning outcomes and moderating effects. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2026;13:1447. doi:10.1057/s41599-026-08536-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Yang H, Kim M, Kang S. The effects of design thinking in high school chemistry classes. J Korean Chem Soc. 2020;64(3):159-174. doi:10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.3.159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmad Z, Ammar M, Sellami A, Al-Thani NJ. Effective pedagogical approaches used in high school chemistry education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Chem Educ. 2023;100(5):1796-1810. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Twizeyimana E, Shyiramunda T. The effect of inquiry-based chemistry laboratory instruction on students’ conceptual understanding: A meta-analysis. SAGE Open. 2026. doi:10.1177/21582440261466348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Muneer S, Santhosh M, Parangusan H, Bhadra J. A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2026;36:919-949. doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Pande M, Bharathi SV. Theoretical foundations of design thinking: A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Think Skills Creat. 2020;36:100637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Razzouk R, Shute V. What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educ Res. 2012;82(3):330-348. doi:10.3102/0034654312457429. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(6):84-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16:235-266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles

Engineering,
Management &
Applied Science
Journal
(IJLTEMAS)
Published by RSIS International
Tower B, Suncity Success Tower
Golf Course Ext Rd, Sector 65
Gurugram, Haryana 122101, India
© 2026 IJLTEMAS · RSIS International. ISSN 2278-2540.