Design Thinking-Based Chemistry Instruction for Concept Application and Problem-Solving Skills Among Secondary School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study Protocol
Authors
M. SHABANA, M.Sc., M.Ed., Ph.D.
Research Scholar, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)
Research Supervisor, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)
Co-Research Supervisor, School of Education, VELS (VISTAS) University, Chennai (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900149
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2974-2981
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-29
Accepted: 2026-10-05
Published: 2026-10-23
Abstract
Background. Secondary chemistry requires students to transfer concepts to unfamiliar situations, interpret evidence and construct explanations. A structured design-thinking process may provide repeated opportunities to practise these behaviours.
Aim. To evaluate, in a prospective school-based study, whether a six-week design thinking-based chemistry programme improves concept application and problem-solving skills compared with conventional chemistry instruction.
Methods. This protocol describes a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test comparison-group study among secondary school students. The intervention consists of six weekly cycles involving understanding a context, defining a chemistry problem, generating alternatives, developing a solution, testing evidence and revising the solution. The primary outcomes will be scores on a Concept Application Test (CAT) and a Problem-Solving Skills Test (PSST). The instruments will undergo expert review, pilot testing, reliability assessment and rubric-based scorer training before the main study. The sample size will be determined a priori using a formal power calculation. Baseline-adjusted post-test comparisons will account for clustering by class or teacher where applicable.
Expected contribution. The study is designed to provide empirical evidence on a clearly specified, chemistry-specific design-thinking intervention. No synthetic or simulated observations are presented as study findings in this protocol
Keywords
design thinking; chemistry education; secondary school; concept application; problem-solving; active learning; study protocol
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Yu Q, Yu K, Lin R. A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11:742. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03237-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. He X, Xiong H, Peng K, Xie J. How does design thinking promote STEM learning? Meta-analysis of learning outcomes and moderating effects. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2026;13:1447. doi:10.1057/s41599-026-08536-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Yang H, Kim M, Kang S. The effects of design thinking in high school chemistry classes. J Korean Chem Soc. 2020;64(3):159-174. doi:10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.3.159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Ahmad Z, Ammar M, Sellami A, Al-Thani NJ. Effective pedagogical approaches used in high school chemistry education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Chem Educ. 2023;100(5):1796-1810. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00739. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Twizeyimana E, Shyiramunda T. The effect of inquiry-based chemistry laboratory instruction on students’ conceptual understanding: A meta-analysis. SAGE Open. 2026. doi:10.1177/21582440261466348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Muneer S, Santhosh M, Parangusan H, Bhadra J. A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2026;36:919-949. doi:10.1007/s10798-025-10005-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Pande M, Bharathi SV. Theoretical foundations of design thinking: A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Think Skills Creat. 2020;36:100637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Razzouk R, Shute V. What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev Educ Res. 2012;82(3):330-348. doi:10.3102/0034654312457429. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(6):84-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hmelo-Silver CE. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16:235-266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention on Knowledge Regarding Oral Health Among Primigravida in Selected Hospitals of Navi Mumbai
- Attitude towards Mathematics and Science in Relation to STEM Career Aspirations among Senior Secondary School Students
- AI-Driven Personalized Learning in Educational Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Learning and Decision Support
- Institutionalizing Indigenous Peoples Education in Philippine Basic Education: Development of the Integrated Institutionalization Framework for Indigenous Peoples Education (IIF-IPEd)
- Toward an Integrated Theory of Enterprise Risk Management: A Multi-Theoretical Conceptual Framework
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0