Detecting Fake Products in African E-Commerce Markets: An Artificial Intelligence Framework Using a Tanzania-Informed Simulation
Authors
Senior Lecturer - ICT Department the Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Tanzania)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900063
Subject Category: Robotic
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 1812-1823
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-13
Accepted: 2026-09-18
Published: 2026-10-10
Abstract
The rapid expansion of e-commerce in Africa has increased consumer access to goods while also creating opportunities for counterfeit and misleading product listings. This study proposes a multi-signal artificial intelligence framework for counterfeit-product risk detection and evaluates it through a reproducible Tanzania-informed simulation rather than through direct observation of Tanzanian marketplace transactions. A synthetic dataset of 1,000 product listings was generated with a 70:30 genuine-to-counterfeit class ratio. Five marketplace signals were modelled: price deviation, seller reputation, image similarity, review sentiment, and description quality. The revised simulation protocol specifies the class-conditional distributions, contamination assumptions, random seed, train-test split, cross-validation strategy, hyperparameter search, and evaluation metrics. Four supervised classifiers - logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost - were compared. No raw product images were used to train a convolutional neural network; instead, image similarity was treated as a scalar signal that could in practice be produced by an upstream visual-comparison component. On a stratified 20% holdout set, logistic regression achieved 0.920 accuracy, 0.867 precision, 0.867 recall, 0.867 F1-score, and 0.950 ROC-AUC. Repeated stratified five-fold cross-validation produced mean accuracies of approximately 0.889-0.893 across the four models. The findings therefore support the technical feasibility of multi-signal screening under controlled simulated conditions, not operational validation in Tanzanian e-commerce. The paper concludes that future deployment should be validated with real African marketplace data, raw product imagery, network-level seller relationships, and explainable decision support for human moderators
Keywords
African digital markets, artificial intelligence, counterfeit detection, e-commerce, machine learning, simulation, Tanzania
Downloads
References
1. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chiu, C.-M., Wang, E. T. G., Fang, Y.-H., & Huang, H.-Y. (2014). Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, 4171-4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dou, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, L., Deng, Y., Peng, H., & Yu, P. S. (2020). Enhancing graph neural network-based fraud detectors against camouflaged fraudsters. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM '20). https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3411903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Economides, N., & Jeziorski, P. (2017). Mobile money in Tanzania. Marketing Science, 36(6), 815-837. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gupta, R., Jindal, V., & Kashyap, I. (2024). Recent state-of-the-art of fake review detection: A comprehensive review. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 39, e8, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888924000067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008). Opinion spam and analysis. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1145/1341531.1341560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Kabanda, S. K., & Brown, I. (2015). E-commerce enablers and barriers in Tanzanian small and medium enterprises. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 67(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00485.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://papers.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Makame, W. H., Kang, J., & Park, S. (2014). Factors influencing electronic commerce adoption in developing countries: The case of Tanzania. South African Journal of Business Management, 45(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v45i2.126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mewada, A., & Dewang, R. K. (2022). Research on false review detection methods: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34(9), 7530-7546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.07.021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mlelwa, K. L., Chachage, B., & Zaipuna, Y. O. (2015). E-commerce trend in developing countries: A case study of Tanzania. International Journal of Computer Applications, 125(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2015905220 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Mukherjee, A., Liu, B., & Glance, N. (2012). Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Oreku, G. S., Mtenzi, F. J., & Ali, A. D. (2013). A viewpoint of Tanzania e-commerce and implementation barriers. Computer Science and Information Systems, 10(1), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS110725002O [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ott, M., Choi, Y., Cardie, C., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 309-319. https://aclanthology.org/P11-1032/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Peng, J., Zou, B., He, X., & Zhu, C. (2022). Hybrid attention network with appraiser-guided loss for counterfeit luxury handbag detection. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8, 2371-2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-021-00633-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., Krueger, G., & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 139, 8748-8763. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/radford21a.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ren, Y., & Ji, D. (2017). Neural networks for deceptive opinion spam detection: An empirical study. Information Sciences, 385-386, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.01.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Savage, D., Zhang, X., Yu, X., Chou, P., & Wang, Q. (2015). Detection of opinion spam based on anomalous rating deviation. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8650-8657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]