Effect of Artificial Intelligence and Supply Chain Technology on Firm Value of Selected Consumer Goods Manufacturing Firms in Nigeria
Authors
Bursary Department Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology Igboora, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Economics, Ajayi Crowder University Oyo, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Business Administration and Management Oyo State College of Agriculture and Technology Igboora, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900100
Subject Category: Supply Chain Management
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2277-2286
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-30
Accepted: 2026-10-05
Published: 2026-10-17
Abstract
The rapid diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI), digital analytics, automation and smart supply-chain technologies is transforming the manner in which manufacturing firms forecast demand, manage inventories, coordinate suppliers, optimise production and create shareholder value. Despite the increasing strategic importance of these technologies, empirical evidence on their relationship with firm value in Nigeria remains limited, particularly within the consumer-goods manufacturing sector. This study investigates the effect of artificial intelligence and supply-chain technology on the firm value of selected listed consumer-goods manufacturing firms in Nigeria over the period 2015–2024. The study adopts an ex-post facto research design and uses secondary data extracted from audited annual reports, corporate reports and Nigerian Exchange market information. Top Ten listed consumer-goods manufacturing firms constituted the sample. From correlation and regression anlysis, Supply Chain Technology was found to have a negative and statistically significant relationship with Tobin's Q (β = -0.101, p = 0.016), while Artificial Intelligence had a positive but statistically insignificant relationship with Tobin's Q (β = 0.651, p = 0.410). These findings suggest that the relationship between technological adoption and market valuation may be more complex than a simple assumption that greater technology adoption automatically results in higher firm value. It was therefore recommended that Consumer manufacturing firms should not view the acquisition of Supply Chain Technology or Artificial Intelligence as an end in itself. Rather, management should evaluate technology investments based on their expected contribution to operational efficiency, cost reduction, revenue growth, customer responsiveness, and ultimately firm value.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence; supply-chain technology; firm value; Tobin's Q; consumer goods; manufacturing firms; Nigeria; technology adoption; panel data.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Cao, Y., Liu, M., Qiu, J., & Zhao, R. (2024). Information in disclosing emerging technologies: Evidence from AI disclosure. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4987085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cooke, T. E. (1989). Voluntary corporate disclosure by Swedish companies. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 1(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-646X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Haq, I. U., et al. (2024). Advancing manufacturing through artificial intelligence: Current landscape, perspectives, best practices, challenges, and future direction. IEEE Access, 12, 131621–131637. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3458830 I IEEE Xplore [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Lee, K. L., Teong, C. X., Alzoubi, H. M., Alshurideh, M. T., El Khatib, M., Al-Gharaibeh, S. M., et al. (2024). Digital supply chain transformation: The role of smart technologies on operational performance in manufacturing industry. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 332. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02898-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Li, J., Yi, M., & Sun, Q. (2025). Artificial intelligence and supply chain risk: Mediating effects of supply chain efficiency and resilience. International Review of Financial Analysis, 108, Article 104700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Marston, C. L., & Shrives, P. J. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: A review article. The British Accounting Review, 23(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-8389(91)90080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Oyerogba, E. O., Anjorin, S. Y., Alamu, J. A., & Shangodare, T. O. (2024). Influence of adoption of modern manufacturing technologies on firm value of the listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v20i1.1845 O Online Academic Press [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Shi, Y., Wu, T., Qin, C., & Liu, B. (2025). The value-creating potential of AI: A multi-dimensional analysis of effects and mechanisms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 108, Article 104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104694 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Song, D., Deng, Z., & Wang, B. (2025). Are companies better off with AI? The effect of AI service failure events on firm value. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 125(2), [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Yu, et al. (2024). Enhancing innovativeness and performance of the manufacturing supply chain through datafication: The role of resilience. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 188, Article 109841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109841 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Yu, Y., et al. (2024). Enhancing innovativeness and performance of the manufacturing supply chain through datafication: The role of resilience. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 188, 109841. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Yu, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, J. Z., Liu, Y. D., Kamal, M. M., & Cao, Y. (2024). Unleashing the power of AI in manufacturing: Enhancing resilience and performance through cognitive insights, process automation, and cognitive engagement. International Journal of Production Economics, 270, Article 109175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0