Failure Analysis of Crankshaft with Variations of Defect Locations Using the Finite Element Method
Authors
Computational Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam – Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia (Indonesia)
Computational Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam – Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia (Indonesia)
Computational Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam – Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia (Indonesia)
Computational Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Darussalam – Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia (Indonesia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150700082
Subject Category: Mechanical Engineering
Volume/Issue: 15/7 | Page No: 1018-1033
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-29
Accepted: 2026-08-03
Published: 2026-08-13
Abstract
Crankshaft is a critical component in an internal combustion engine, operating under cyclic bending and torsional loads, making it susceptible to fatigue failure, particularly in regions with high stress concentration and pre-existing defects. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of defect location on the failure mechanism of the crankshaft using the Finite Element Method (FEM). The analysis was performed using ANSYS Student version of Mechanical on both defect-free and defective models. Defects were introduced at the crankpin fillet, main journal fillet, and oil hole. The material was specified as ASTM A536 Grade 80-55-06. The evaluated parameters included von Mises stress, strain, and Mode I stress intensity factor (KI). The simulation results showed that the maximum von Mises stress in the defect-free model was 364.18 MPa, which is below the material yield strength of 379.2 MPa. In contrast, defective models produced KI values ranging from 45 to 57 MPa√m, all exceeding the material fracture toughness (KIC) of 32.9 MPa√m. The highest KI value, 57 MPa√m, occurred at the main journal fillet with a crack depth of 0.6 mm. The results indicate that increasing crack depth elevates the likelihood of crack propagation and subsequent fatigue failure. Defect location exerts a significant influence on crankshaft failure behavior, and FEM provides an effective approach for predicting crack propagation in engine components.
Keywords
Crankshaft, stress analysis, finite element method, failure analysis, stress intensity factor.
Downloads
References
1. Metkar, A., RM Sunnapwar, and SD Hiwase. (2011). Review: Fatigue analysis and estimated life of crankshafts. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Mater., Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 425–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Prasetya, T., Sarifuddin, and BJ Raharjo. (2018). Crank Pin Journal Crankshaft Wear on Diesel Engine Generator on MV. Kartini Baruna. J. Bahari Dynamics, Vol. 9, pp. 2126–2136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Çevik, G., and R. Gürbüz. (2013). Evaluation of fatigue performance of a fillet rolled diesel engine crankshaft. Eng. File. Anal., Vol. 27, pp. 250–261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Chetan Kahate, Ashok Keche, (2016) "Failure analysis of crankshaft using finite element approach," International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS), Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 46–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Paswan, MK, and AK Goel. (2008). Fatigue testing procedure of six-cylinder diesel engine crankshaft. ARISER, Vol. 3, pp. 144–151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. LL Myagkov, K. Mahkamov, ND Chainov, and I. Mankamova, (2014) “Advanced and Conventional Internal Combustion Engine Materials,” in Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies for Improved Environmental Performance: Towards Zero Carbon Transportation, Elsevier, Ch. 11, pp. 370–392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Husaini, M. Notomi, K. Kishimoto, and T. Shibuya. (1997). Crack initiation behavior of ABS resin under mode I and mixed mode loading. Materials Science Research International, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 158–165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. RM Metkar, VK Sunnapwar, and SD Hiwase, (2011) "A fatigue analysis and life estimation of crankshaft – A review," International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering (IJMME), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 425–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Husaini, TE Putra, and Zulfikar. (2018). Analysis of Cracks on a Fractured Surface of the Vehicle Crankshaft Using the Finite Element Method. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol. 7, no. 4.36, pp. 1564–1568. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Abdullah, S., JC Choi, JA Giaconim, and JR Yates. (2006). Bump extraction algorithm for variable amplitude fatigue loading. Int. J. Fatigue, Vol. 28, pp. 675–691. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Information on DuraBar ASTM A536 Grade 80-55-06. Available at:https://www.dura-bar.com/products/ductile-iron-80-55-06.cfm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kai-Pen Jen, Joseph T. Scardina, and D.G. Smith. (1985). Fracture behavior of as-cast pearlite nodular iron. Mater. Sci. Eng., Vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 227–236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Cook, R.D. (1990). Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. 2nd ed. Bandung, Indonesia: PT Eresco, pp. 4–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Husaini. (2015). Basics of Fracture Mechanics. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Husaini, R. Riantoni, N. Ali, & T. E. Putra. (2019). Failure Analysis of the Leaf Spring of Truck Colt Diesel Using Finite Element Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 547. 012017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Husaini, N. Ali, R. Riantoni, T. E. Putra & H. Husin. (2021). Study of leaf spring fracture behavior used in the suspension systems in the diesel truck vehicles. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 541 012046. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Husaini, N. Ali & A. Bakhtiar. (2016). Analysis on The Surface of Broken Screw Spring Front Car Suspension. Proseding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Rekayasa (SNTR) III. 111-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Farzin, M., and S. Akhavan. (2014). Stress analysis of a crankshaft under dynamic loading. International Journal of the Iron & Steel Society of Iran, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 16–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. T. E. Putra, Husaini, M. Ikbal. (2021). Automotive suspension component behaviors driven on flat and rough road surfaces. Heliyon, 7(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Husaini, N. Ali, J. K. Hamza & S. E. Sofyan. (2019). Effects of welding on the change of microstructure and mechanical properties of low carbon steel. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 523. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. T. E. Putra & Husaini. (2018). Identifying strain signal characteristics of automotive suspension system subjected to road surface vibrations. AIP Conf. Proc. 1983, 030004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhang, H. Y., Qu, S., Dong, C., Fu, C. M., Zang, Q. S. and Zhang, Z. F.. "Failure Analysis of a Diesel Engine Crankshaft" Practical Metallography, vol. 58, no. 5, 2021, pp. 282-298. https://doi.org/10.1515/pm-2021-0020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Witek, L. & Sikora, Michał & Stachowicz, Feliks & Trzepieciński, Tomasz. (2017). Stress and failure analysis of the crankshaft of diesel engine. Engineering Failure Analysis. 82. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.06.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]