Foundation for Enduring Enterprises: Reimagining Corporate Governance for Zimbabwe and Africa

This paper examines an overlooked persistence of economic fragility, challenging the collective consensus in the field that attributes fragility to dualism, which classical scholarship identifies as a difference in productivity, level of development, or culture. Existing frameworks, however, fail to account for the sustained coexistence of standardized and embedded institutional systems within the same economic space. This paper argues that fragility is a structural condition arising from the coexistence of systems governed by incompatible rules of legitimacy. To explain this condition, the paper introduces the Universality Constraint, which describes the necessity for standardized mechanisms of coordination as economic systems expand beyond relationally bounded space. While such mechanisms give rise to standardized institutional systems, they do not displace embedded systems already present. The result is institutional coexistence, dualism, plurality, or synthesis. The analysis advances a relational framework in which economic coordination is defined not by the existence of systems but by the subset of cross-system interactions that are recognised, enforceable, and sustainable. From this perspective, dualism reflects a constrained domain of valid relations across coexisting systems. Institutional synthesis is therefore reconceptualised as an emergent structure arising from the expansion of this domain, rather than the replacement or merger of systems. The Universality Constraint, the Dualistic Proposition, the Theory of Inter-System Relations, and the Synthesis Proposition that follow are original constructs developed in this paper. Five case studies illustrate the framework's application. The British South Africa Company (BSAC) and Zimbabwe's contemporary artisanal and small-scale gold mining sector demonstrate how the introduction of standardized systems, without mechanisms for validating cross-system relations, produces persistent fragmentation. Conversely, the transformation of Mitsubishi from a family-controlled zaibatsu into a modern keiretsu, and the regulatory integration of Zimbabwe's EcoCash mobile money platform into the national payment system, illustrate that interaction between systems does not always generate fragility. A fifth case, drawn from Zimbabwe's own remote communal lands, where customary governance operates without a second dominant system contesting the space, tests the boundary of the framework directly, showing that institutional systems can emerge and organize an economic space without competition or a second system present at all. The findings suggest that economic integration does not depend on the expansion of standardized institutions alone, but on the conditions under which relations between standardized and embedded institutional systems become valid.

Economic space E(A), Systems (S), Actor, Institution, Organisation, Legitimacy, Dominance, Equivalent Economic Function, Organisation of Economic Space,

1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A. (2001) 'The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation', American Economic Review, 91(5), pp. 1369–1401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A. (2012) Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. African Development Bank (2013) Economic Brief: Drivers and Dynamics of Fragility in Africa. Tunis: African Development Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ahmadjian, C.L. and Lincoln, J.R. (2001) 'Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry', Organization Science, 12(6), pp. 683–701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boege, V., Brown, M.A. and Clements, K.P. (2009) 'Hybrid political orders, not fragile states', Peace Review, 21(1), pp. 13–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Boeke, J.H. (1953) Economics and Economic Policy of Dual Societies, as Exemplified by Indonesia. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chigwata, T.C. (2016) 'The role of traditional leaders in Zimbabwe: are they still relevant?', Law, Democracy & Development, 20, pp. 69–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Frank, A.G. (1966) 'The development of underdevelopment', Monthly Review, 18(4), pp. 17–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Friedland, R. and Alford, R.R. (1991) 'Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions', in Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–263. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Furnivall, J.S. (1948) Colonial Policy and Practice: A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Galbraith, J.S. (1974) Crown and Charter: The Early Years of the British South Africa Company. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gerlach, M.L. (1992) Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Goodfellow, T. and Lindemann, S. (2013) 'The clash of institutions: Traditional authority, conflict and the failure of "hybridity" in Buganda', Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 51(1), pp. 3–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Government of Zimbabwe (1961) Mines and Minerals Act [Chapter 21:05]. Harare: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Griffiths, J. (1986) 'What is legal pluralism?', Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), pp. 1–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hlungwani, P.M., Yingi, E. and Chitongo, L. (2021) 'Governance and politics of small-scale artisanal gold mining in Zimbabwe', Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 6(1), pp. 42–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Knight, J. (1992) Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lewis, W.A. (1954) 'Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour', The Manchester School, 22(2), pp. 139–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Logan, C. (2013) 'The roots of resilience: exploring popular support for African traditional authorities', African Affairs, 112(448), pp. 353–376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mawowa, S. (2013) 'The political economy of artisanal and small-scale gold mining in Central Zimbabwe', Journal of Southern African Studies, 39(4), pp. 921–936. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Meagher, K. (2012) 'The strength of weak states? Non-state security forces and hybrid governance in Africa', Development and Change, 43(5), pp. 1073–1101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Merry, S.E. (1988) 'Legal pluralism', Law & Society Review, 22(5), pp. 869–896. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Michalopoulos, S. and Papaioannou, E. (2020) 'Historical legacies and African development', Journal of Economic Literature, 58(1), pp. 53–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ncube, S. (2023) 'Complexities of competition regulation in Zimbabwe’s mobile money sector', The African Journal of Information and Communication, 32, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ncube-Phiri, S., Ncube, A., Mucherera, B. and Ncube, K. (2015) 'Artisanal small-scale mining: Potential ecological disaster in Mzingwane District, Zimbabwe', Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 7(1), a158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Phimister, I. (1988) An Economic and Social History of Zimbabwe, 1890–1948: Capital Accumulation and Class Struggle. Harlow: Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (2020) Banking (Money Transmission, Mobile Banking and Mobile Money Interoperability) Regulations, Statutory Instrument 80 of 2020. Harare: Government of Zimbabwe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Riggs, F.W. (1964) Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Risse, T. (ed.) (2011) Governance Without a State? Policies and Politics in Areas of Limited Statehood. New York: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tamanaha, B.Z. (1993) 'The folly of the "social scientific" concept of legal pluralism', Journal of Law and Society, 20(2), pp. 192–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W. (1999) 'Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990', American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), pp. 801–843. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Van de Walle, N. (2001) African Economies and the Politics of Permanent Crisis, 1979–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zimbabwe Environmental Law Association (2021) Formalization of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Sector is the Way to Go. Harare: ZELA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]