Political Accountability and Disaster Governance in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Literature Review

Political accountability is widely recognized as a critical component of effective disaster governance in Southeast Asia, yet its influence on disaster preparedness, emergency response, recovery, and resilience has not been systematically synthesized across the region. This systematic literature review aimed to examine how political accountability mechanisms shape disaster governance outcomes in Southeast Asia, with particular emphasis on Philippine practices and regional governance patterns. Specifically, the review explored how accountability mechanisms are operationalized, their association with disaster risk reduction outcomes, and the governance challenges and best practices evident across Southeast Asian countries. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, JSTOR, ResearchGate, and ProQuest. From an initial 1,000 records, 68 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed using qualitative thematic synthesis. The analysis focused on four major themes: political accountability mechanisms, disaster governance outcomes, Philippine disaster governance practices, and regional governance patterns. Findings indicate that legislative oversight, transparency, civil society participation, and decentralized governance were generally associated with stronger disaster preparedness, early warning systems, and emergency response effectiveness. However, recovery and long-term resilience remain constrained by institutional fragmentation, uneven local capacities, overlapping responsibilities, and limited inter-agency coordination. Philippine studies underscore the importance of barangay participation, local governance, and community-based disaster risk reduction in strengthening preparedness, public trust, and local responsiveness despite persistent coordination challenges. Regional comparisons further reveal that decentralization enhances local disaster governance only when supported by adequate resources, institutional capacity, and sustained accountability. Overall, the review concludes that political accountability is associated with improved disaster governance when reinforced by transparency, community participation, institutional oversight, and effective coordination across government levels. Strengthening these governance mechanisms can enhance disaster preparedness, response, recovery, and resilience while informing evidence-based disaster risk reduction policies and governance reforms throughout Southeast Asia.

community participation; disaster risk reduction; governance resilience; local governance; political accountability

1. Abrigo, M. R., & Brucal, A. (2019). National-to-local aid and recovery from extreme weather events: Evidence from the Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3590258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adamy, A., & Rani, H. A. (2021). An evaluation of community satisfaction with the government's COVID-19 pandemic response in Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 69, 102723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adila, I., Asmara, D. W. W., & Tamitiadini, D. (2018). Resolving health communication problem on disaster risk through community relationships. Jurnal Kajian Ruang Sosial-Budaya, 1(2), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.sosiologi.jkrsb.2018.002.2.02 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alhadi, Z., Riandini, O., & Maani, K. (2023). Involvement and design of strengthening policy actors in tsunami disaster risk governance in Padang City. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aoki, N. (2023). Fiscal decentralization and disaster mitigation: Evidence from the Philippines [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tokyo]. Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo. https://www.pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/02_51218206Thesis2023S_revised-v2.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Arumbinang, M. H., & Satriawan, I. (2025). Indonesian constitutional rights protection and climate change: Safeguarding future generations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1475(1), 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1475/1/012032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Astuti, V. W., & Rimawati, R. (2021). The principles of the Kelud community in disaster management. Babali Nursing Research, 2(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.37363/bnr.2021.2138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Baharuddin, T. (2025). From disaster response to the political stage: Disasters as arenas for the reproduction of power ahead of elections. Citizen and Government Review, 2(2), 197–211. https://cjrjournal.com/index.php/cgr/article/view/23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bierens, S., Boersma, K., & van den Homberg, M. J. C. (2020). The legitimacy, accountability, and ownership of an impact-based forecasting model in disaster governance. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cruz, L. de la, Gonzales, M., Combinido, P., Cajilig, P. G., Alburo-Cañete, K. Z., & Recio, R. B. (2024). Grounding disaster justice perspectives from practitioners. Philippine Studies, 72(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.T2024040300008290402013255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cunanan, A., Panergo, S., Pua, M., Sandoval, S., & Soliven, A. (2022). Where is the force? Mismatches and contradictions with post-disaster recovery and rehabilitation task forces. International Journal of Disaster Management, 5(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v5i2.26065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cunanan, T. A. R. A., Lagasca, E. F. L., Noriega, C. J. J., & Cabauatan, R. (2022). Damages caused by natural disasters and the number of natural calamities' effect on Philippine government spending on disaster management. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), e001284. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i2.1284 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dangcalan, R. J. P., Amparo, J. M. S., Mendoza, M. E. T., Jimena, C. E. G., Torio, D. A., & Alviar, N. B. (2020). Critical junctures in disaster governance: Lessons from Marikina City, Philippines post-Ketsana. Asian Journal of Resilience, 2(1), 1–14. https://asianjournalofresilience.com/index.php/ajr/article/view/5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. David, A., & Pillora, K. (2025). Protecting lives and properties against calamities: The experiences of disaster risk reduction and management personnel. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 7(5), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2025.7.5.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Domingo, S. N., & Manejar, A. J. A. (2018). Disaster preparedness and local governance in the Philippines (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2018-52). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2018.52 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Era, M. (2021). Vertical and horizontal accountability on disaster preparedness and response of two highly urbanized cities in Metro Manila, Philippines. E3S Web of Conferences, 331, 02017. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202133102017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Espia, J. C. P. (2025). Beyond clientelism: State–civil society relations in disaster risk management policymaking in the Philippines. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251385598 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Florano, E. R. (2014). Community governance for disaster recovery and resilience: Four case studies in the Philippines (PIDS Discussion Paper Series No. 2014-38). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2014.38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fuady, M., Munadi, R., & Fuady, M. A. K. (2021). Disaster mitigation in Indonesia: Between plans and reality. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1087(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1087/1/012011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Gabriel, A. G., Santiago, P. N. M., & Casimiro, R. R. (2021). Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in comprehensive development planning of the cities in Nueva Ecija in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 12(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00351-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Howe, B., & Bang, G. (2017). Nargis and Haiyan: The politics of natural disaster management in Myanmar and the Philippines. Asian Studies Review, 41(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1265484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hutagalung, S. S., & Sulistio, E. B. (2020). Analysis of government collaborative action on COVID-19 disaster management in Lampung Province. IAPA Proceedings Conference, 194. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2020.444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Iuchi, K., Jibiki, Y., & Tamayose, B. (2020). Learning from a post-Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda recovery institution (OPARR): A new research agenda for recovery governance. Journal of Disaster Research, 15(7), 845–854. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2020.p0845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Izumi, T., & Shaw, R. (2022). A multi-country comparative analysis of the impact of COVID-19 and natural hazards in India, Japan, the Philippines, and the USA. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 73, 102899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102899 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Jovita, H. D., Nashir, H., Mutiarin, D., Moner, Y., & Nurmandi, A. (2019). Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 29(4), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1556143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jovita, H. D., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., & Purnomo, E. P. (2018). Why does network governance fail in managing post-disaster conditions in the Philippines? Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), 585. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kammerbauer, M., Mateo-Babiano, I. B., & Minnery, J. (2018). Planning and governance for disaster recovery in Tacloban after Typhoon Haiyan. In G. Forino, S. Bonati, & L. M. Calandra (Eds.), Governance of risk, hazards and disasters: Trends in theory and practice (pp. 258–273). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463896-16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Khaledi, H., Ahmadi Marzaleh, M., Peyravi, M., & Rezaee, R. (2023). Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in disaster management: A qualitative study. Trauma Monthly, 28(1), 678–686. https://doi.org/10.30491/tm.2023.368785.1525 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Khunwishit, S., Choosuk, C., & Webb, G. (2018). Flood resilience building in Thailand: Assessing progress and the effect of leadership. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 9(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0162-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kusuma, R. R., Widianingsih, I., Sintaningrum, S., & Myrna, R. (2019). Evaluating the performance of flood prevention programs in Bandung Regency: Using logic model. IAPA Proceedings Conference, 18. https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2019.218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Liu, M., & Anbumozhi, V. (2021). Application of supply chain approach to improving hazard-resilient health services: Framework analysis for ASEAN and options of implementation. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 23(S3), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-020-00134-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Maly, E., Vahanvati, M., & Sararit, T. (2022). People-centered disaster recovery: A comparison of long-term outcomes of housing reconstruction in Thailand, India, and Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 81, 103234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mardialina, M., Anam, S., Karjaya, L. P., Hidayat, A., & Lestari, B. U. S. (2024). The ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management (AHA Centre): Examining a gender-based approach in the 2018 Lombok earthquake. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 12(2), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v12i2.11367 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Moreno, F., & Lopez, I. F. (2025). Strategic governance of flood and drought management: A case study of Zamboanga City, Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5042771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Muzani, M., Fatimah, A. N., Imsa, M. A., & Casmana, A. R. (2022). The obstacles hierarchy of school disaster preparedness implementation in the Mount Sinabung area, Indonesia. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.842990 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nowell, B., Steelman, T., Velez, A. K., & Yang, Z. (2017). The structure of effective governance of disaster response networks: Insights from the field. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(7), 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017724225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Nugroho, A., Takahashi, M., & Masaya, I. (2021). Village fund asymmetric information in disaster management: Evidence from the village level in Banda Aceh City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 630(1), 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/630/1/012011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nurjanah, A., Sakir, & Ishak, A. (2021). The role of Masyarakat Peduli Api (MPA) communities in forest and land fire disaster communication in Riau Province: A case study in Siak District in 2019. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020) (pp. 203–210). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210120.125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Panao, R. A. (2022). Philippine disaster management: Disaster policy or policy disaster? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3998807 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pasamonte, R. C. (2025). Strengthening community engagement in local disaster management: The Northern Mindanao, Philippines experience. Jurnal Public Policy, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v11i1.9270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Prianto, A. L., & Abdillah, A. (2023). Resilient cities, vulnerable communities: Disaster governance in the coastal cities in Indonesia. In A. Singh (Ed.), International handbook of disaster research (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8800-3_193-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Resuello, M. D. (2020). Building a disaster-resilient local economy: The case of the Philippines. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(4), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i4.17752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ruswandi, D., & Maarif, S. (2023). Implementation of disaster response policy in Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 464, 10003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346410003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sepanton, S. R. B., & Salvador, L. M., Jr. (2024). Community preparedness and disaster management of Purok 33-A Agro Compound, Ecoland, Davao City, Philippines. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i03.22537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Sholeha, A. W., Sumarmi, S., Utaya, S., & Bachri, S. (2022). Making Cities Resilient 2030 assessment for tourism cities: An analytical study of local government capacity at Batu City, Indonesia. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 78(4), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.78.4.32296 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Sumarsyah, W. (2025). Post-disaster rehabilitation and reconstruction policy study: Between public interest and project politics. Journal of Politica Governo, 2, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.62872/nzqg1451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Suryaman, Y. (2018). Addressing accountability deficits in collaborative working: A case study of disaster management in Garut, West Java. KRISNA: Kumpulan Riset Akuntansi, 10(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.22225/kr.10.1.711.41-50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sutton, S. A., Paton, D., Buergelt, P., Sagala, S., & Meilianda, E. (2020). Sustaining a transformative disaster risk reduction strategy: Grandmothers' telling and singing tsunami stories for over 100 years saving lives on Simeulue Island. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7764. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217764 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tanesab, J. P. (2020). Institutional effectiveness and inclusions: Public perceptions of Indonesia's disaster management authorities. International Journal of Disaster Management, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24815/ijdm.v3i2.17621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Tanguid, S. B., Jr., & Tanguid, R. V. (2023). Disaster resilience and capability in the maintenance of public order during disasters in calamity-prone municipalities in Oriental Mindoro, Philippines. American Journal of Environmental Economics, 2(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajee.v2i1.2056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tjitrawati, A. T., & Romadhona, M. K. (2023). Affliction in the post-Palu disaster: State failure to implement human rights standards in disaster management. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2233255. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2233255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wang, X., Yu, X., & Yu, X. (2022). Flood disaster risk assessment based on the DEA model in Southeast Asia along the “Belt and Road.” Sustainability, 14(20), 13145. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Wardiono, K., Dimyati, K., & Absori, A. (2021). Law, philosophy, and disasters: An earthquake-handling case in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(5), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2020-0074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Warganegara, A., & Samson, M. G. M. (2020). Collaboration and disaster: Critical responses after tsunami events in Indonesia. Environmental Hazards, 20(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2020.1813680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Yuniarti, Y., Respati, T., Januarita, R., & Irasanti, S. N. (2024). Policy constraints on local governance for community resilience: Qualitative insights from stakeholders in disaster-prone areas. KnE Social Sciences, 9(24), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i24.16824 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Indonesia's LNG Industry toward 2035: From Export-Led Growth to a Balanced Gas Economy
• Wetland Depletion Assessment in Marine Local Government Areas of Rivers State
• Study of Induced Magnetic Field for MHD Convective Flow
• Board Characteristics, Digital Innovation, and Corporate Financial Performance in Listed Conglomerate Industries in Nigeria
• Effects of Jigsaw IV Instructional Strategy on Senior Secondary School Students’ Interest in Physics