Sit-at-Home Orders and Regional Economic Development in South-East Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation
Authors
Ohiri Ifeanyichukwu Franklyn (PhD)
University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Umuagwo, Imo State. (Nigeria)
Omeni-Pius Raymond Onyedikachukwu (PhD)
University of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Umuagwo, Imo State. (Nigeria)
Imo State University Owerri. (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900129
Subject Category: Social Sciences
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 2659-2685
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-28
Accepted: 2026-10-03
Published: 2026-10-19
Abstract
This study examines the association between Sit-at-Home Orders (SAHO) and selected indicators of regional economic development in South-East Nigeria over the period 2021–2025. Specifically, the study examines the relationship between SAHO and Per Capita Income (PCI), Poverty Rate (POVR), and Unemployment Rate (UR) across Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo States.
The study adopts an ex-post facto design supported by survey evidence and a state-year panel framework. Information on the incidence and intensity of Sit-at-Home Orders was obtained through a structured questionnaire, while economic-development indicators were obtained from official statistical sources. The analysis employs panel regression techniques subject to the identification and variation available in the SAHO measure. The results indicated negative association between SAHO and Per Capita Income and positive associations between SAHO and Poverty Rate and Unemployment Rate. However, the results are interpreted as associations rather than causal effects because the study period contains only 25 state-year observations and the SAHO measure exhibits limited cross-state variation. The study recommends measures aimed at improving security, restoring economic continuity, protecting employment and strengthening household livelihoods in South-East Nigeria.
Keywords
Sit-at-Home Orders; Regional Economic Development; Per Capita Income; Poverty Rate; Unemployment Rate; South-East Nigeria; Panel Regression.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Downloads
References
1. Akomolafe, O. A., & Akpan, U. (2024). Information cues and fear as moderators of the predictors of compliance to Indigenous People of Biafra sit-at-home communication messages among small-scale business operators in South-East Nigeria. Communication and the Public, *9*(3), 262–276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anodi, K. C., Ezeanokwasa, F. C., Attah, A. P., Ezenwuba, O. J., Edibo, E. A., & Nwagbala, S. C. (2026). Impact of Monday sit-at-home calls on informal street businesses in South-East Nigeria. Journal of African Business and Economic Research, *15*(1), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Anoke, C. I., et al. (2024). Devastating socio-economic effects of sit-at-home orders on small and medium enterprises in South-East Nigeria: A call for resilience and recovery. International Journal of Advanced Research, *12*(3), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Edesiri, G. O., & Egbunike, P. A. (2016). Economic implications of insecurity in Nigeria: A study of peace accounting. African Journal of Economic Studies, *8*(2), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ejiofor, O. E., Nwangwu, C., Ume, C., Onah, O. G., Chiemela, C. J., & Omeje, E. E. (2026). Unlocking critical insights into the perceived effects of the Indigenous People of Biafra’s sit-at-home protests on producers and marketers of perishable crops in Southeastern Nigeria. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, *44*(1), e70044. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Enyi, P. E., Akintoye, I. R., & Ajibade, A. (2020). Peace accounting and its implication on economic development in Nigeria. The International Journal of Business & Management, *8*(3), 162–168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ifekwe, B. C. (2025). Economic sustainability of the South-East region in the context of persistent sit-at-home orders. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, *67*(2), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ijeomah, M. C. (2014). Fundamentals of peace accounting: A conceptual approach. Nigerian Journal of Accounting Research, *6*(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ikpozu, C., et al. (2024). Effects of sit-at-home orders on trade and investment in South-East Nigeria. Journal of Development and Economic Studies, *12*(3), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Irem, C. O., Nwire, O. S., Nwogo, O. O., & Egba, N. V. (2026). The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) agitation and its socio-economic implications in South East Nigeria. African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies, *19*(2), 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Johnson, J. O. (2016). Peace accounting and economic growth in Nigeria (MPRA Paper No. 99464). Munich Personal RePEc Archive. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). Nigeria multidimensional poverty index (2022). National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Nigeria labour force survey. National Bureau of Statistics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Nwagbala, S. C., Ezenenwu, O. C., Ezeanokwasa, F. C., Okwudiri, E. I., & Anodi, K. C. (2026). Effect of sit-at-home orders on the effectiveness of strategic leadership in Onitsha Main Market, Anambra State. African Journal of Management and Business Research, *14*(1), 89–106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nwankwo, C. (2023). Sit-at-home orders and micro and small businesses in South-East Nigeria. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, *11*(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Obona, E. E. (2023). Sit-at-home order and poverty in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, *31*(2), 201–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. OECD. (2018). OECD regions and cities at a glance 2018. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ogba, M. C., Akogwu, C. J., & Ezeh, K. D. (2023). Sit-at-home order and socio-economic development in the Southeast: Implications. South East Political Science Review, *8*(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Oghoghomeh, T., & Ironkwe, U. (2020). The impact of security expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Policy, *15*(2), 89–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ohiri, I. F. (2026). Sit-at-home orders and regional economic development in South-East Nigeria: An empirical investigation [Unpublished manuscript]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Okechukwu, E. C., & Ifekwe, B. C. (2025). Sit-at-home orders and job security among traders and business owners in the South-East. Nigerian Journal of Labour and Employment Studies, *9*(1), 34–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Okere, P. A., Towolawi, B., & Okere, C. (2023). Peace accounting and sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Finance, *14*(1), 56–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Okoro, A. S., & Egberi, A. E. (2020). The cost of conflict: A peace accounting perspective in Nigeria. Journal of African Economic Studies, *9*(3), 34–49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Okpoko, C. C., Onyishi, C. J., & Okeke, C. O. (2025). Public perceptions of the effect of IPOB sit-at-home orders on economic and educational development in South-East Nigeria. Journal of African Economic Development, *22*(4), 567–589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Orji, U. O., & Anaukwu, C. E. (2023). Enforcement of sit-at-home orders and economic activities in South-East Nigeria, 2021–2023. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, *23*(2), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ozibo, E., & Okorie, N. (2022). Sit-at-home orders and economic growth in South-Eastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economic Research, *19*(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. SBM Intelligence. (2025). Four years of disruption: Unmasking the impact of IPOB’s sit-at-home order in Southeast Nigeria. SBM Intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Taro Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. World Bank. (2023). Nigeria country partnership framework. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. World Bank. (2024). World development indicators. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Democracy, Regional Integration and Sustainable Peace
- Academic Achievement in Relation to Self-Confidence, Parental Attitude and Intelligence
- From Social Anxiety to Smartphone Addiction: Investigating the Predictive Role of Social Interaction Anxiety in Problematic Smartphone Use among Adults in Dhaka City
- An In-Depth Analysis of Climate Change and its Effects on Agriculture
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0