Thermal Behavior, Phase Composition, and Surface Chemistry of a Multiphase Cₓ–NaOₓ–La–O–CeO₂ Hybrid Material
Authors
Hubert Augusto Alvarez Alvarez
Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil (Brazil)
DFA–GFS, Surface Physics Laboratory, Gleb Wataghin Institute of Physics, UNICAMP, Brazil (Brazil)
Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Piauí, Teresina, Brazil (Brazil)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900048
Subject Category: Materials Science
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 625-647
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-05
Accepted: 2026-09-12
Published: 2026-10-07
Abstract
This study reports the synthesis and physicochemical characterization of a hybrid material composed of a carbonaceous matrix modified with lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), and sodium (Na), designated Sample B. Thermoanalytical techniques, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) were combined to examine its thermal behavior, phase composition, and surface chemical environments. The study is limited to material characterization and does not evaluate catalytic, chemical-sensing, electrical, or electrochemical performance.
Thermogravimetric (TG–DTG) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) revealed multistep behavior. Moisture and weakly retained species were removed at low temperature, while a broad exothermic event with a maximum at 469.6 °C was attributed predominantly to oxidation of the carbonaceous matrix, with possible overlapping decomposition and reorganization of the inorganic components. DTA alone does not demonstrate crystallization of CeO₂, La₂O₃, or another specific phase. XRD supported the coexistence of a low-order carbonaceous matrix with crystalline CeO₂ domains; La₂O₃ and Na₂CO₃ were considered probable, whereas La(OH)₃ remained provisional because of reflection overlap.
XPS qualitatively confirmed C, O, Na, La, and Ce at the surface. The corrected C 1s contributions at 284.80, 286.18, and 291.06 eV were compatible with C–C/C=C, overlapping C–O/C–OH/C–O–C environments, and a π–π* shake-up satellite, respectively. The O 1s contribution at 532.73 eV was treated as an overlapping oxygenated envelope, whereas the component at 537.23 eV remained unresolved and was not assigned to a specific species. Na 1s confirmed sodium in oxygen-containing environments without differentiating NaOH, Na₂CO₃, Na₂O-like species, or possible interfacial configurations. La 3d was compatible with La³⁺–O environments, and Ce 3d qualitatively confirmed oxidized cerium; however, the available resolution did not permit reliable differentiation of individual La species, quantification of Ce³⁺/Ce⁴⁺, or determination of oxygen-vacancy concentration.
The combined results support a heterogeneous, multiphase structural model comprising a functionalized low-order carbon matrix, crystalline CeO₂ domains, La–O species, and probably partially carbonated sodium species. These findings establish the material’s thermal, structural, and surface-chemical characteristics. Possible catalytic, adsorption, sensing, or electrochemical behavior remains unverified and requires dedicated functional tests, suitable control materials, quantitative composition analysis, and complementary textural, morphological, spectroscopic, and electrical measurements.
Keywords
activated carbon; ceria; lanthanum oxide; sodium species; thermal analysis; X-ray diffraction; XPS; hybrid material.
Downloads
References
1. Chew, T. W.; H’Ng, P. S.; Chin, K. L.; et al. A Review of Bio-Based Activated Carbon Properties Produced from Different Activating Chemicals during Chemical Activation of Biomass. Materials 2023, 16, 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Maniarasu, R.; Rathore, S. K.; Murugan, S. Biomass-Based Activated Carbon for CO₂ Adsorption—A Review. Energy & Environment 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221093465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Iwanow, M.; Gartner, T.; Sieber, V.; et al. Activated Carbon as Catalyst Support: Precursors, Preparation, Modification and Characterization. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 1188–1202. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. González, A. S.; Plaza, M. G.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. Sustainable Biomass-Based Carbon Adsorbents for Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 230, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Deng, S.; Wei, H.; Chen, T.; et al. Superior CO₂ Adsorption on Pine Nut Shell-Derived Activated Carbons. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7063–7070. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5064688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Zhou, K.; Ma, W.; Zeng, Z.; et al. Experimental and DFT Study on the Adsorption of VOCs on Activated Carbon/Metal Oxide Composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 1122–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.218 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Nasiman, T.; Kanoh, H. Preparation of the Na₂CO₃–Carbon Nanocomposite and Its CO₂ Capture. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 12689–12694. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kim, W.-K.; Vikrant, K.; Younis, S. A.; Kim, K.-H.; Heynderickx, P. M. Metal Oxide/Activated Carbon Composites for Reactive Adsorption and Catalytic Oxidation of Formaldehyde and Toluene in Air. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 387, 135925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135925 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Pan, W.; et al. CeO₂-Based Catalysts for Photocatalytic Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds: A Comprehensive Review. J. Environ. Manage. 2025, 389, 126146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Li, J.; Xiong, J.; et al. Research Progress of CeO₂-Containing Catalysts in Catalytic Oxidation of CO. Carbon and Hydrogen 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbh2.70011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Sun, T.; Levin, B. D. A.; Schmidt, M. P.; Guzman, J. J. L.; Enders, A.; Martínez, C. E.; Muller, D. A.; Angenent, L. T.; Lehmann, J. Simultaneous Quantification of Electron Transfer by Carbon Matrices and Functional Groups in Pyrogenic Carbon. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (15), 8538–8547. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sivakami, K. U.; et al. Biofilm Inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and Alizarin Red Dye-Removing Capability of Plant-Based Green Synthesis of Lanthanum Oxide Nanoparticles. Reactions 2025, 6, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/reactions6020032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Mavuso, M. A.; et al. Heterostructured CeO₂–M (M = Co, Cu, Mn, Fe, Ni) Oxide Nanocatalysts for Visible-Light Photooxidation of Pinene. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 9775–9788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Aleixo, F. C.; et al. Optimization of Catalyst Synthesis Using Ornamental Stone Waste Supported on Activated Carbon for Enhancing Biodiesel Production Efficiency. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 31536–31548. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c02065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Zhu, J.; Gui, Z.; Ding, Y. A Simple Route to Lanthanum Hydroxide Nanorods. Materials Letters 2008, 62(16), 2373–2376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Wilsey, M. K.; Watson, K. R.; Fasusi, O. C.; Yegela, B. P.; Cox, C. P.; Raffaelle, P. R.; Cai, L.; Müller, A. M. Selective Hydroxylation of Carbon Fiber Paper for Long-Lasting Hydrophilicity by a Green Chemistry Process. Advanced Materials Interfaces 2023, 10 (2), 2201684. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202201684 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Stottmeister, D.; Wildersinn, L.; Maibach, J.; Hofmann, A.; Jeschull, F.; Groß, A. Unraveling Propylene Oxide Formation in Alkali Metal Batteries. ChemSusChem 2024, 17 (3), e202300995. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202300995 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Maslakov, K. I.; et al. The Electronic Structure and Nature of the Chemical Bond in CeO₂. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 16167–16175. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP01442F [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gonzalez-Elipe, A. R.; et al. XPS Study of the Surface Carbonation/Hydroxylation State of Metal Oxides. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1990, 45, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(90)90060-D [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Villa, A.; et al. Effects of Oxygen Functionalities on Hydrous Hydrazine Decomposition over Carbonaceous Materials. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 15871–15877. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT02310A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Weilhard, A.; Popov, I.; Kohlrausch, E. C.; Aliev, G. N.; Blankenship, L. S.; Norman, L. T.; Ghaderzadeh, S.; Smith, L.; Isaacs, M.; O’Shea, J.; Lanterna, A. E.; Theis, W.; Morgan, D.; Hutchings, G. J.; Besley, E.; Khlobystov, A. N.; Alves Fernandes, J. A. A Descriptor Guiding the Selection of Catalyst Supports for Ammonia Synthesis. Chemical Science 2025, 16, 4851–4859. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC08253B [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Stoerzinger, K. A.; et al. Probing Adsorbates on La₁₋ₓSrₓNiO₃₋δ Surfaces under Humid Conditions: Implications for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021, 54. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abf674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Zhang, J.; Wong, H.; Yu, D.; Kakushima, K.; Iwai, H. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Study of High-k CeO₂/La₂O₃ Stacked Dielectrics. AIP Advances 2014, 4 (11), 117117. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4902017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Oxygen: X-ray Photoelectron Spectra and Elemental Information. Available online: https://www.thermofisher.cn/cn/zh/home/materials-science/learning-center/periodic-table/non-metal/oxygen.html (accessed September 5, 2026). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Rogers, J. A.; Lee, C. H.; Yin, L.; Huang, X.; Leal, C. M. das N. B.; Harburg, D. V. Materials, Electronic Systems and Modes for Active and Passive Transience. Japanese Patent JP6561368B2, filed April 11, 2014; published August 21, 2019. Assignee: The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. https://patents.google.com/patent/JP6561368B2/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]