Urbanisation and Geomorphic Transformation of the Drainage Network in the Ram Nadi Watershed, Pune, India

Urban expansion modifies watershed hydrology and geomorphology through growth of impervious cover, slope modification, channel encroachment, and disruption of low-order drainage pathways. This study evaluates land-use/land-cover (LULC) change and drainage-network transformation in the 50.95 km² Ram Nadi watershed, Pune, India. The quantitative historical analysis integrates Survey of India topographic sheets, multi-temporal Landsat imagery for 1991, 2000, 2010 and 2015, GIS-based drainage mapping, cross-profile analysis, and field reconnaissance. The legacy LULC workflow used supervised pixel-based classification in ERDAS IMAGINE; because the archived project files do not retain the classifier specification, training-sample inventory, or an independent confusion matrix, numerical accuracy statistics cannot be reconstructed and the class percentages are treated as descriptive mapped estimates. Drainage loss was assessed using an operational definition that required historical map evidence of a channel, loss or physical interruption of the mapped channel trace in 2015 spatial data, and field evidence of conversion, filling, construction, or persistent obstruction; seasonal absence of surface water alone was not considered sufficient evidence of channel loss. Settlement cover increased from 22.19% in 1991 to 47.55% in 2015, whereas agricultural land declined from 10.65% to 2.01%. Of 416 historically mapped drainage segments, 106 (25.48%) were classified as obliterated or converted by 2015, representing 47.42 km of mapped channel length; most losses occurred in first-order channels. Corrected regional calculations show that total built-up area increased from 1,165.49 ha to 2,074.81 ha, an increase of 909.32 ha (78.02%). Post-2015 institutional records from 2023-2024 indicate that wastewater discharge and channel-management pressures remain relevant within the watershed. The results demonstrate a strong spatial association between urban expansion and drainage-network fragmentation; however, event-specific flood causation cannot be established without rainfall-runoff and hydraulic modelling. The study therefore provides a geomorphic and spatial basis for drainage protection, restoration prioritisation, and future high-resolution monitoring of the Ram Nadi watershed.

urbanisation; drainage-network fragmentation; land-use/land-cover change; remote sensing; GIS; low-order streams; Ram Nadi; Pune

1. Arnold, C. L., & Gibbons, C. J. (1996). Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 243-258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bhailume, S. A. (2011). A geographical study of civic amenities in PMC area using GIS techniques. International Journal of India Streams Research Journal, 4, 188-192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bhaskar, P. (2012). Urbanization and changing green spaces in Indian cities (case study - city of Pune). International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2(2), 148-156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bloom, A. L. (2002). Geomorphology - A systematic analysis of late Cenozoic landforms (3rd ed.). New Delhi, India: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, pp. 419-458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Booth, D. B., & Jackson, C. R. (1997). Urbanization of aquatic systems - Degradation thresholds, stormwater detention, and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 22(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brunsden, D. (1970). Slopes form and process. Institute of British Geographers Special Publication, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Census of India. (2011). House listing and housing census schedule. Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chengtai, D. (1995). An approach to theory and methods of urban geomorphology. Chinese Geographical Science, 6, 88-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. City Development Plan Report. (2012). Pune Municipal Corporation, Maharashtra, India. Indo-USAID Financial Institutions Reform and Expansion Project - Debt and Infrastructure Component (FIRE-D Project). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Coates, D. (1976). Urban geomorphology. Geological Society of America, Boulder, CO, USA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Congalton, R. G. (1991). A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1), 35-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cooke, R. U., & Doornkamp, J. C. (1974). Geomorphology in environmental management (pp. 8-20). Ely House, London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198740212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cooke, R. U., Brunsden, D., Doornkamp, J., & Jones, D. (1982). Urban geomorphology in drylands (pp. 72-106). New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dikshit, K. R. (1986). Maharashtra in maps. Bombay: Maharashtra State Board for Literature and Culture. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dingman, S. L. (2009). Fluvial hydraulics (pp. 20-94). New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dixit, K., & Ahmed, I. (1998). Managing the Himalayan watershed - A flood of questions. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(44). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Duraiswami, R. A., Dumale, V., & Shetty, U. (2009). Geospatial mapping of potential recharge zones in parts of Pune city. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 73, 621-638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Easterbrook, D. J. (1969). Principles of geomorphology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Environmental Status Report. (2012-13). Pune Municipal Corporation and The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Foody, G. M. (2002). Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1), 185-201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fracassi, C. P., & de Lollo, J. A. (2013). Urban sprawl in small cities: Analysis of the municipality of São Pedro (SP) - potentials and constraints. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 7(1), 64-73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Geological Survey of India. (1996). Contribution in environmental geology (Special Publication No. 43, pp. 1-265). New Delhi, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Goudie, A. S. (2004). Encyclopaedia of geomorphology. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Government of India. (2004). Guidelines for conservation, development and management of urban greens. Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Forest Policy Division, F. No. 1-2/2004-FP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Graf, W. L. (1975). The impact of suburbanization on fluvial geomorphology. Water Resources Research, 11(5), 690-692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gregory, K. J., & Park, C. (1974). Adjustment of river channel capacity downstream from a reservoir. Water Resources Research, 10(4), 870-873. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hack, J. T., & Goodlett, J. C. (1960). Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 347, p. 66). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 9pp. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Joglekar, P. P., Deo, S. G., Balakawade, P., Deshpande-Mukherjee, A., Rajaguru, S. N., & Kulkarni, A. N. (2006-07). A new look at ancient Pune through salvage archaeology. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, 66-67, 211-225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kale, V. S., & Gupta, A. (2001). Introduction to geomorphology (pp. 82-101). India: Orient Longman Ltd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kumar, A., & Pandey, R. N. (1981). Morphometric analysis of some drainage basins of the Hazaribagh Plateau region. The National Geographical Journal of India, 27(1-2), 50-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Leopold, L. B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning - A guidebook on the hydrological effects of urban land use (U.S. Geological Survey Circular 554). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. McDonnell, M. J., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71, 1232-1237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. National Atlas and Thematic Mapping Organisation. (1996). Geomorphological mapping, perspective and dimensions (Monograph 13; P. Nag & G. N. Saha, Eds.). Calcutta, Government of India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. National Environmental Engineering Research Institute. (2011). Report on the current status of the Mithi River and possible solutions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. National Green Tribunal. (2023). Joint Committee Report in Original Application No. 52/2023, Krunnal Narayan Gharre v. Pune Municipal Corporation & Ors.; site inspection of the Ramnadi corridor on 24 July 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., & Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 148, 42-57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2011). Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India, using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), 248-269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Pune Municipal Corporation. (2014). Water Supply Department: Presentation on water supply in Pune city. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Pune Municipal Corporation. (2024). Sewage Maintenance & Repairing Department Letter O. No. 169, dated 24 April 2024, concerning untreated wastewater from Bhugaon and Bhukum entering Ramnadi; filed in Original Application No. 52/2023 before the National Green Tribunal, Western Zone Bench, Pune. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Punithavathi, J., Tamilenthi, S., & Baskaran, R. (2011). Geomorphological interpretation and urban sprawl details of Thanjavur district, Tamil Nadu. World Journal of Science and Technology, 1(4), 19-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Sawant, S. B. (1978). The city of Poona: A study in urban geography (pp. 15-29). University of Pune, Pune. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Shekhar, S. (2012). Detecting slums from QuickBird data in Pune using an object-oriented approach. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXIX-B8, 519-524. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Singh, H. S. (2012). Status of tree cover in urban areas of Gujarat, trees in municipal corporations and municipalities: Tree counting in urban and sub-urban areas - 2011. Gujarat Forest Department. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Strahler, A. N. (2011). Physical geography (4th ed., p. 455). Singapore: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Thornbury, W. D. (1954). Principles of geomorphology (2nd ed.). University of California. ISBN 978-8123908113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. United Nations General Assembly. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. United States Geological Survey. (2015). Landsat 8 data products. http://landsat.usgs.gov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 019282080X. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Zipperer, W. C., Sisinni, S. M., & Pouyat, R. V. (1997). Urban tree cover: An ecological perspective. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 229-246. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]