IJLTEMASInternational Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS)IJLTEMAS2278-2540IJLTEMAS28910.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800095EducationComparing the Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Graphene Oxide on to the Disinfection of Enterococcus Faecalis-Contaminated Gutta-Percha ConesFathima K.C.Roshan
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India IndiaBabyDeepak
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India IndiaP.V.Sreedevi
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India IndiaPrakashLikhitha
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India IndiaA.SKiran
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India India15813031309280820260209202618092026sodium hypochlorite; microorganism; microstructure.Abstract
Chairside disinfection of gutta-percha (GP) cones is routinely performed to minimize the risk of microbial contamination during root canal obturation. In the present study, the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in comparison with graphene oxide on the disinfection against microorganisms has been investigated. The disinfectants treatment has produced alterations in the surface characteristics of GP cones, which impacted their physical properties. Among the disinfectants used, the lower OD600 value (0.1864) of NaOCl demonstrated its greatest antibacterial activity.
ReferencesSiqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Microbiology of endodontic infections. In: Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, editors. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016. p. 559–599.Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dental Clinics of North America. 1974;18(2):269–296.Grossman LI, Oliet S, Del Rio CE. Endodontic Practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988.Rotstein I, Ingle JI, editors. Ingle’s Endodontics. 7th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2019.Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors. Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009.Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, Lewis AG, Thomas L. Rapid sterilization of gutta-percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Journal of Endodontics. 1975;1(4):136– 140.Pang NS, Jung IY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Lee WC, Kum KY. Effects of short-term chemical disinfection of gutta-percha cones: Identification of affected microbes and alterations in surface texture and physical properties. Journal of Endodontics. 2007;33(5):594–598.Nabeshima CK, de Lima Machado ME, Borges Britto ML, Pallotta RC. Effectiveness of different chemical agents for disinfection of gutta-percha cones. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2011;37(3):118–121.Gurgel-Filho ED, Feitosa JA, Teixeira FB, de Paula RC, Silva JA, Souza-Filho FJ. Chemical and X-ray analyses of five brands of dental gutta-percha cone. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36(4):302–307Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(2):93–98.Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis—A mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(5):399–405.Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. International Endodontic Journal. 2022;55:512–530 14. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35(3):221–228.Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. Journal of Endodontics. 2002;28(10):689–693.Kayaoglu G, Ørstavik D. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: Relationship to endodontic disease. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2004;15(5):308–320.Portenier I, Waltimo TM, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis—The root canal survivor and ‘star’ in post-treatment disease. Endodontic Topics. 2003;6(1):135–159.Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BP, Simão RA. Effect of disinfectant solutions on gutta-percha and Resilon cones. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2012;75(6):791–795.Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(6):424–428.Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: An update review. International Dental Journal. 2008;58(6):329–341.Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(5):389–398.Müller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2008;61(6):1281–1287.Nanda SS, Yi DK, Kim K. Study of antibacterial mechanism of graphene oxide using Raman spectroscopy. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:28443.Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):6971–6980.Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology Advances. 2009;27(1):76–83.Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramírez JT, Yacaman MJ. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(10):2346–2353.Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(6):1712–1720.Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2007;3(1):95–101.Hübner NO, Siebert J, Kramer A. Octenidine dihydrochloride, a modern antiseptic for skin, mucous membranes. and wounds. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2010;23(5):244–258.