IJLTEMAS International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS) IJLTEMAS 2278-2540 IJLTEMAS 402 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900051 Economics Methods for Producing Economic Data: Are Surveys Becoming Less Reliable? Evidence, Risks, and a Quality-Assurance Framework for Nigeria and Beyond Williams Aminadokiari Samuel Abomaye-Nimenibo Ph.D Prof. Director of Postgraduate Studies, School of Postgraduate Studies, Obong University, Obong Ntak, Etim Ekpo LGA, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria Nigeria 15 9 674 685 29 08 2026 10 09 2026 07 10 2026 economic data; survey reliability; total survey error; nonresponse; measurement error; data quality; official statistics; Nigeria Abstract

Economic data shape fiscal and monetary policy, social protection, investment decisions, credit ratings, development finance, and the evaluation of public programmes. Yet the reliability of the data used for these purposes cannot be taken for granted. This article critically examines whether survey-based economic data are becoming less reliable and, more importantly, identifies the conditions under which survey estimates remain fit for purpose. The paper is an integrative methodological review that reorganises and extends the original manuscript through the total survey error perspective, official-statistics quality frameworks, and recent evidence from household-survey practice, with particular attention to Nigeria. The analysis distinguishes sampling error from coverage error, nonresponse, measurement error, interviewer and mode effects, processing and imputation errors, and analytical or reporting distortions. It argues that declining response and changing communication technologies create genuine risks, but that low response rates do not mechanically imply high bias, and surveys should not be contrasted with “statistical data” because surveys are themselves a major source of official statistics. Evidence from Nigeria illustrates both the continuing value of well-designed probability surveys and the importance of mode-specific validation: recent experimental work finds meaningful differences between phone and face-to-face responses across common economic and welfare indicators. The article proposes a data-quality strategy based on probability sampling where feasible, mixed-mode and responsive designs, computer-assisted collection, transparent metadata, validation against administrative or transaction records, selective integration of geospatial and digital data, explicit treatment of uncertainty, and reproducible analysis. The central conclusion is that surveys are not obsolete; rather, single-source, weakly documented and poorly validated data-production systems are increasingly difficult to defend. Reliability is best achieved through transparent, multi-source statistical systems in which surveys remain a core but continuously audited component.

 References Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x Biemer, P. P. (2010). Total survey error: Design, implementation, and evaluation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 817–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq058 Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. Wiley. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally. Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., de Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., Sakshaug, J. W., Struminskaya, B., & Wenz, A. (2020). A review of conceptual approaches and empirical evidence on probability and nonprobability sample survey research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz041 de Leeuw, E. D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21(2), 233–255. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. Groves, R. M., & Lyberg, L. (2010). Total survey error: Past, present, and future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(5), 849–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq065 Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011 Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley. International Monetary Fund. (2012). Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF): Generic framework. IMF Data Quality Reference Site. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). Wiley. Markhof, Y., Wollburg, P., Palacios-Lopez, A., Castaing, P., Sagesaka, A., & Contreras, I. (2026). The effect of survey mode on data quality: Experimental evidence from Nigeria (Policy Research Working Paper No. 11302). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-11302 Meyer, B. D., Mok, W. K. C., & Sullivan, J. X. (2015). Household surveys in crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.4.199 National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Nigeria General Household Survey-Panel (GHS-Panel) Wave 5 (2023/2024): Tracking Nigerian households to understand their resilience over time. NBS. National Research Council. (2013). Nonresponse in social science surveys: A research agenda (R. Tourangeau & T. J. Plewes, Eds.). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18293 Schouten, B., Cobben, F., & Bethlehem, J. (2009). Indicators for the representativeness of survey response. Survey Methodology, 35(1), 101–113. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press. United Nations. (2014). Fundamental principles of official statistics (General Assembly Resolution A/RES/68/261). United Nations. World Bank. (n.d.). Living Standards Measurement Study: Survey methods. World Bank. World Bank. (2020). Nigeria Living Standards Survey 2018–2019: Study documentation and data processing. World Bank Microdata Library.