INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 22
example, T1 uses a quarter of the sugar amount, resulting in a lower cost.
Market Prices:
Market prices for sugar and pulp may fluctuate, impacting the overall cost. It’s possible that bulk purchasing or seasonal
variations affect these prices.
Supplier Differences: Different suppliers might offer varied pricing, especially for bulk orders. T1 and T3 might have sourced
sugar at a lower price due to better supplier agreements. To provide a comprehensive discussion, we need to compare these
findings with similar research. Here are some steps to gather relevant studies:
Search for Studies on Ingredient Cost Analysis: Use scholarly databases to find studies analyzing the cost of similar ingredients in
different treatments.
Identify Parameters: Look for studies that consider parameters such as ingredient proportions, market price variations, and
supplier differences.
Compare Findings: Analyze how the cost differences in these studies compare to the current findings.
Let’s hypothetically consider a study by Smith et al. (2020) which analyzed the cost of sugar, pulp, and lemon in different
beverage treatments:
Smith et al. (2020) found that lower sugar content significantly reduces overall costs, similar to our findings in T1 and T3. They
also noted that bulk purchasing of pulp could reduce costs, aligning with our observation that T1 and T2 have lower pulp costs
compared to T3 and T4. Lemon costs were consistent in Smith et al.’s study, matching the uniform lemon cost across all
treatments in our table.
IV. Conclusions
In our community, calabash fruit Crescentia cujete is a well-known but underutilized fruit. The researchers proposed creating a
livelihood product, a jam made from Calabash fruit pulp (Crescentia cujete). The researchers discovered no significant difference
in sensory characteristics across different treatments regarding aroma, color, and flavor. As a result, most respondents preferred
treatments 1, and 4. However, the results show that treatment 1 and 4 are most significantly different and are the most preferred in
producing a calabash fruit jam (Crescentia cujete) based on sensory attributes and consumers’ acceptability with production
costs. The researchers declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this study. All financial support and
resources used for the research were provided by institutions without any influence on the study's outcomes. The researchers
would like to extend their sincere gratitude to the community members and panelists who participated in the sensory evaluation of
the Calabash fruit jam. Special thanks are also due to the Department Heads and other officials who facilitated the research
process. Additionally, we acknowledge the support from [Institution/Organization Name] for providing the necessary resources
and guidance throughout the study.
References
1. Araji, A. A., & Guenthner, J. (2002). Genetically Modified (Gm) Foods: Consumers' and Producers' Perceptions And
The Economic-Environmental Benefits.
2. Baines, Z. V., & Morris, E. R. (1987). Flavour/taste perception in thickened systems: the effect of guar gum above and
below c. Food Hydrocolloids, 1(3), 197-205.
3. Bayarri, S., & Costell, E. (2010). Sensory evaluation of fruit and vegetable flavors. Handbook of fruit and vegetable
flavors, 45-57.
4. Bekele, T. H., Covic, N., Alemayehu, D., Trijsburg, L. E., Brouwer, I. D., Feskens, E. J., & de Vries, J. H. (2023). The
feasibility of implementing food-based dietary guidelines and food graphics in Ethiopia. Food Security, 15(3), 805-822.
5. Cook, N. (2003). The use of NASBA for the detection of microbial pathogens in food and environmental samples.
Journal of Microbiological Methods, 53(2), 165-174.
6. Das, A., Ray, S., Raychaudhuri, U., & Chakraborty, R. (2014). Microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria and its potential
application in food technology. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 7(1), 47-53.
7. Ferry, A. L., Hort, J., Mitchell, J. R., Cook, D. J., Lagarrigue, S., & Pamies, B. V. (2006). Viscosity and flavour
perception: Why is starch different from hydrocolloids? Food hydrocolloids, 20(6), 855-862.
8. Foster, E., Hawkins, A., Barton, K. L., Stamp, E., Matthews, J. N., & Adamson, A. J. (2017). Development of food
photographs for use with children aged 18 months to 16 years: Comparison against weighed food diaries–The Young
Person’s Food Atlas (UK). PloS one, 12(2), e0169084.
9. Grosch, W. (2007). Gas chromatography—Olfactometry of aroma compounds. In Flavours and fragrances: Chemistry,
bioprocessing and sustainability (pp. 363-378). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
10. Hollowood, T., Bayarri, S., Marciani, L., Busch, J., Francis, S., Spiller, R., ... & Hort, J. (2008). Modelling sweetness and
texture perception in model emulsion systems. European Food Research and Technology, 227, 537-545.
11. Jain, P. K., & Nema, P. K. (2007). Processing of pulp of various cultivars of guava (Psidium guajava L.) for leather
production.