INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue X, October 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 13
and youth disempowerment. The findings from the reviewed studies faced contextual and geographical limitations thus
lowering the confidence for generalization of the findings. However, this endeavor aimed to explore the effects of TVET in
promoting youth employability in Kisumu County, Kenya.
Statement of the Problem
The Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2017 ranks Kenya 97th out of 283 countries, highlighting the country's lag in
TVET skills development, with many graduates perceived to lack essential skills for driving economic productivity. In
Kisumu County, 41% of youth remain unemployed despite having completed tertiary education, including TVET. This issue
is expected to worsen, as 15,000-20,000 TVET graduates enter the job market annually (Republic of Kenya, 2022).
Ineffective TVET has far-reaching consequences, including high unemployment, skills shortages, social exclusion, increased
crime, and hampered economic growth, ultimately hindering Kenya's Vision 2030 goals. Literature suggests skill mismatches
as a cause of low demographic dividends in Kenya, although studies from Nigeria and Rwanda, as well as works by Muchira
et al. (2023), have limited contextual relevance. While TVET is claimed to foster entrepreneurship and job creation,
contributing to economic development (Inyiagu, 2019; Muchira et al., 2023), but existing findings suffer from limited validity
due to reliance on secondary data and qualitative methods. This research aimed to address these gaps by exploring the effects
of TVET training in promoting youth employability among youth in Kisumu County, Kenya.
II. Literature Review
Empirical Review
A study was conducted by Hakizayezu and Manira (2022) on the relationship between TVET and employability of graduates
in Rwanda whereby it was revealed that mismatch of TVET failed to match the industry needs with the acquired skills to
promote employability of youths. Hakizayezu and Manira (2022) conducted a study using descriptive survey and randomly
sampling 192 trainees and trainers, structured-questionnaires descriptive statistics and guided-interviews. However, the
instruments were not pilot-tested and the generalization of the findings was limited to Rwandan geographical settings. This
endeavour overcame the limitations by pilot-testing the instruments for reliability and validity in order to enhance the
confidence for the results. Additionally, this endeavour explored the effects of TVET on youth employability of youths in
Kisumu County which is Kenyan geographical settings.
Another related study was carried out by Nyongesa and Makokha (2022) exploring on the effects of TVET on youth
employability of graduates in Kenya revealed controversial results whereby most of the TVET courses were found to be
driven by market demand. The study by Nyongesa and Makokha (2022) adopted correlational research design, sample size of
60 heads of departments, purposive sampling, structured questionnaires, interview schedule, documentary analysis and
descriptive analysis. Nevertheless, the study ignored responses from students leading to biased results. The use of purposive
sampling was biased and constrained generalization of the findings. By depending on structured questionnaires and
descriptive statistics limited inferencing. To overcome the limitation, this endeavour integrated interviews and questionnaires
and collect data from the students, trainers and an official from the Ministry of Education for greater validity. Also, this
endeavour used stratified random sampling and combined qualitative, descriptive and inferential analytical methods for
greater generalization.
In Kenya, a related study exploring on the realignment of TVET for employment creation by Koros (2022a) found that
employment creation depends on TVET alignment with industry needs. The study by Koros (2022a) adopted qualitative
design, meta-analysis, purposive sampling of articles and content analysis. But reliance on qualitative methodology including
purposive sampling, secondary sources of data and content analysis lowered the validity and generalizability of the findings.
In overcoming the limitation, this endeavour adopted quantitative and qualitative primary sources of data so as to build on the
validity of the findings. Also, this endeavor triangulated qualitative and also quantitative analytical techniques so as to
increased confidence of concluding and generalizing the findings.
Further study was conducted by Odondi and Imani (2023) focusing on employment transition of TVET students under
Safaricom foundation scholarship programme in Kenya whereby most TVET students were found to be employable per the
job market demands. The study by Odondi and Imani (2023) relied on descriptive cross-sectional survey design, sample size
of 1027 respondents, structured questionnaires, interviews, focused group discussion and descriptive statistics. However,
instruments were not pilot-tested which lowered the validity and reliability. Also, the findings were not anchored on any
theoretical framework. To overcome this limitation, this endeavor pilot-tested the instruments so as to improve reliability and
validity. Additionally, the findings were supported by human capital theory, social learning theory and empowerment theory.
Another study was done by Ngulu et al. (2022) on the link between TVET and youth employability in Makueni County,
Kenya whereby TVET trainings was found not to meet the job market requirements leasing hence unemployability. The study
by Ngulu et al. (2022) used descriptive survey, stratified random sampling, 424 teachers and students as respondents,
questionnaires, interviews and observation, descriptive and inferential analysis and T-test. Nonetheless, the data collection
instruments were not pilot tested for validity and reliability. Additionally, the findings were supported by human capital
theory only which lowered the construct validity. Furthermore, the generalization of the finding was limited to the context of
Machakos County. In centrally, this endeavour intended to test the data collection instruments through pilot study in Kisumu
County for the purposes of validity and reliability. Moreover, the findings were supported by three theories namely: human
capital, social learning and empowerment theories in support of the findings. Finally, the endeavor took place in the settings
of Kisumu County in Kenya.