INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 128
Circular Economy in Wastewater Management: Water Reuse and
Resource Recovery Strategies
Udu Chukwudi Emeka and *Okpala Charles Chikwendu
Industrial/Production Engineering Department, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, P.M.B. 5025 Awka, Anambra State – Nigeria
*Correspondence Author
DOI : https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.140300016
Received: 14 March 2025; Accepted: 19 March 2025; Published: 03 April 2025
Abstract: The escalating global demand for water, alongside diminishing freshwater resources, has heightened the urgency for
sustainable wastewater management solutions. Circular Economy seeks to transform wastewater from an environmental burden
into a valuable resource by minimizing waste and maximizing resource recovery. This study investigates essential strategies for
implementing circular economy practices, focusing on water reuse, nutrient recovery, and energy generation to foster both
environmental sustainability and economic viability. It also examines the recovery of valuable resources like biogas, phosphorus,
and nitrogen, which contribute to energy generation and agricultural productivity. The research further delves into policy
frameworks, economic factors, and societal influences that affect the adoption of circular wastewater management practices.
Emphasis is placed on the collaborative roles of governments, industries, and communities in advancing sustainable solutions and
addressing implementation challenges. The integration of smart technologies, including IoT and data analytics, is highlighted as a
means to optimize resource recovery and improve system efficiency. Findings suggest that adopting circular economy strategies
in wastewater management can significantly reduce environmental impacts, lower operational costs, and create new economic
opportunities within the water sector. Nonetheless, challenges such as technological limitations, regulatory barriers, financial
constraints, and public acceptance must be addressed to fully realize these benefits. This research contributes to the expanding
body of knowledge on sustainable wastewater management, offering a roadmap for policymakers, engineers, and stakeholders to
develop resilient systems that support global objectives for water security, climate resilience, and resource efficiency. Future
research should focus on scaling circular solutions, conducting life cycle assessments, and evaluating the long-term
environmental and socio-economic impacts of these strategies.
Keywords: circular economy, wastewater management, water reuse, resource recovery, sustainability, membrane bioreactors,
nutrient recovery
I. Introduction
Water scarcity and environmental degradation have necessitated a transition from traditional wastewater disposal methods to
more sustainable management approaches. Circular Economy (CE) emphasizes the importance of waste minimization and
resource efficiency maximization through practices like reuse, remanufacturing, as well as recycling (Nwamekwe and Okpala,
2025). The CE model in wastewater management offers an innovative solution, aiming to close the loop by reusing treated water,
recovering valuable resources, and generating energy, thereby reducing the environmental impact of wastewater discharge. The
escalating global demand for clean water, driven by rapid population growth, urbanization, and industrialization, has placed
immense pressure on existing freshwater resources. The looming water scarcity crisis, projected to affect nearly half of the global
population by 2030, underscores the urgency for innovative frameworks like the CE model. According to Panda and Panda
(2024), approximately 4 billion people experience water shortages annually, with 1.8 billion facing absolute scarcity by 2025.
Contributing factors include rapid population growth, urbanization, and unsustainable water management practices (Racheeti,
2024).
This intensifying crisis has prompted a paradigm shift towards sustainable and resilient water management strategies.
Wastewater, once viewed merely as waste, is now increasingly recognized as a valuable resource within the CE framework,
which emphasizes resource efficiency, waste minimization, and the creation of closed-loop systems (Lima et al., 2025). The CE
approach transforms wastewater from an environmental liability into a potential asset, focusing on minimizing waste generation,
maximizing resource recovery, and promoting the sustainable reuse of water, nutrients, and energy.
Traditional linear wastewater treatment systems primarily focus on pollutant removal and safe discharge, often overlooking the
valuable resources embedded within wastewater streams. In contrast, CE principles advocate for advanced treatment technologies
and integrated management approaches that enable the recovery and reuse of critical resources. Innovative technologies such as
membrane bioreactors, reverse osmosis, and advanced oxidation processes facilitate the safe and efficient reuse of treated
wastewater for agricultural, industrial, and even potable applications (Obiuto et al., 2024). Successful case studies, including
those in arid regions like Saudi Arabia, demonstrate the effectiveness of these technologies in conserving freshwater resources
and reducing the environmental impact of wastewater discharge (Almulhim and Abubakar, 2023).
Nutrient recovery is another pivotal aspect of circular wastewater management. Nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen,
commonly present in wastewater, can be recovered and recycled as fertilizers, thereby closing the nutrient loop and reducing
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 129
dependence on synthetic fertilizers. A pilot study by Chen et al. (2025), demonstrated that Magnesium Ammonium Phosphate
(MAP) precipitate can recover up to 95% of phosphorus and 84% of nitrogen from wastewater, producing a safe, slow-release
fertilizer. Mani et al. (2024), further optimized conditions for struvite recovery, enhancing efficiency and aligning with
sustainable development goals.
Energy generation through anaerobic digestion and biogas recovery also offers significant benefits, presenting opportunities to
create energy-neutral or even energy-positive wastewater treatment facilities. These integrated systems not only reduce
operational costs but also contribute to greenhouse gas emission reductions, aligning with global climate goals. Despite these
promising advancements, integrating CE principles into wastewater management faces several challenges. Technological
limitations, such as the high costs of advanced treatment systems and the complexity of resource recovery processes, hinder large-
scale implementation. Regulatory frameworks often lag behind technological innovations, leading to uncertainties surrounding
the legal and safety aspects of water reuse and resource recovery (Martin-Hernandez et al., 2024). Public perception and
acceptance are also critical, especially concerning the reuse of treated wastewater for potable purposes, which is frequently met
with skepticism and resistance.
The economic dimension presents additional complexities. While CE approaches can reduce long-term operational costs and
create new revenue streams through resource recovery, the initial capital investment required for advanced treatment technologies
can be substantial. Policy incentives, subsidies, and public-private partnerships are essential to support the transition towards
circular wastewater management (Wang et al., 2024). Moreover, stakeholder engagement is crucial in fostering collaboration
among governments, industries, communities, and research institutions, ensuring that circular strategies are not only
technologically feasible, but also socially acceptable and economically viable. Ultimately, this study aims to support global
efforts towards achieving water security, climate resilience, and resource efficiency through the implementation of circular
economy principles in wastewater management.
II. Conceptual Framework and Key Strategies for Circular Economy in Wastewater Management
Conceptual Framework of Circular Economy in Wastewater Management
The Conceptual Framework of Circular Economy in Wastewater Management illustrates an integrated, closed-loop system aimed
at maximizing resource efficiency and minimizing waste. At its core, the framework promotes the continuous reuse of water and
the recovery of valuable resources from wastewater, aligning with circular economy principles. Figure 1 depicts how wastewater
from domestic, industrial, and agricultural sources undergo treatment processes that facilitate water reuse for irrigation, industrial
processes, and urban applications.
Figure 1: The conceptual framework of circular economy in wastewater management
The framework highlights critical resource recovery pathways, including nutrient extraction (such as nitrogen and phosphorus)
for fertilizers and energy recovery through anaerobic digestion, which produces biogas for renewable energy. Sludge management
is also featured, where bio-solids are processed for compost or energy production. Arrows in the diagram emphasize the
continuous flow of materials and energy, reducing reliance on freshwater sources and minimizing environmental pollution.
Central to the framework is the concept of waste as a resource, transforming traditional linear wastewater management into a
regenerative system. By integrating advanced technologies, stakeholder collaboration, and supportive policies, the framework
aims to create sustainable and resilient wastewater management systems that contribute to environmental protection, economic
growth, and social well-being.
Key Strategies for Circular Economy in Wastewater Management
The shift from traditional linear wastewater treatment systems to circular models focuses on the transformation of wastewater
from an environmental liability into a valuable resource. This transition not only mitigates environmental impacts, but also
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 130
promotes sustainability and economic efficiency by recovering water, nutrients, and energy. Table 1 outlines key strategies for
circular economy in wastewater management.
As highlighted in figure 1, the implementation of real-time monitoring and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven wastewater
treatment optimization for smart Monitoring and IoT Integration in wastewater management enhances process efficiency, detects
leaks, and also minimize resource consumption. AI is defined as an array of technologies that equip computers to accomplish
different advanced functions, like the ability to see, comprehend, appraise and translate both spoken and written languages,
analyze and predict data, make proposals and suggestions, and more (Okpala et al. 2025; Okpala and Udu, 2025; Okpala and
Okpala 2024).
Table 1: Major strategies and benefits of circular economy in wastewater management
Strategy
Description
Benefits
Water Reuse &
Recycling
Treating and reusing wastewater for industrial,
agricultural, and municipal applications.
Reduces freshwater demand and minimizes
wastewater discharge.
Energy Recovery
Extracting energy from wastewater through
anaerobic digestion and biogas production.
Produces renewable energy, lowers operational
costs, and reduces carbon footprint.
Nutrient Recovery
Recovering phosphorus and nitrogen from
wastewater for use as fertilizers.
Enhances soil health, reduces reliance on synthetic
fertilizers, and prevents eutrophication.
Advanced Treatment
Technologies
Using membrane filtration, UV treatment, and
nanotechnology to enhance wastewater
purification.
Ensures high-quality water recovery and supports
sustainable water cycles.
Industrial Symbiosis
Connecting industries to reuse treated wastewater
and by-products in production processes.
Promotes resource efficiency, reduces waste, and
lowers production costs.
Smart Monitoring &
IoT Integration
Implementing real-time monitoring and AI-driven
wastewater treatment optimization.
Improves process efficiency, detects leaks, and
reduces resource consumption.
Decentralized
Wastewater
Treatment
Establishing localized treatment plants to process
wastewater at the source.
Reduces transportation costs, enhances water
accessibility, and supports local ecosystems.
Sludge Valorization
Converting sludge into biochar, compost, or
construction materials.
Minimizes landfill waste, creates value-added
products, and enhances sustainability.
Public-Private
Partnerships (PPP)
Encouraging collaboration between governments,
industries, and communities.
Ensures investment in circular wastewater projects
and promotes regulatory compliance.
Policy & Regulatory
Frameworks
Implementing strict regulations and incentives for
circular wastewater management.
Encourages sustainable practices, drives innovation,
and ensures environmental protection.
The following subsections detail the key strategies in this transformation.
Water Reuse and Recycling
Implementing state-of-the-art filtration and disinfection methods, such as membrane bioreactors, ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, and
ozonation ensures that treated wastewater meets rigorous quality standards. These technologies enable safe reuse in various
applications, including industrial processes, agricultural irrigation, and even potable water supply. High-quality water reclamation
reduces pressure on natural freshwater sources and supports water security in regions that faces water scarcity. Decentralized
treatment allows for localized processing and recycling of wastewater, reducing dependency on large-scale centralized
infrastructures. Tailoring treatment solutions to community-specific needs enhances water recycling efficiency and improves
resilience against disruptions in centralized networks (Cordeiro and Sindhøj, 2024). This localized approach significantly reduces
the cost and environmental footprint associated with transporting wastewater over long distances.
The integration of smart monitoring and control systems is essential for optimizing water quality and distribution. Real-time
sensors and data analytics enable continuous assessment of water parameters, ensuring that recycled water consistently meets
safety and quality benchmarks. This technological integration facilitates prompt adjustments in treatment processes and enhances
the overall reliability of water reuse systems (Alam et al., 2024; Kaviya, 2022). According to Jin (2021), continuous monitoring
systems provide real-time data, allowing for immediate adjustments to treatment processes to maintain water quality.
Nutrient Recovery
Wastewater is a rich source of nutrients like phosphorus and nitrogen which are essential for agricultural productivity but often
lost in traditional treatment processes. Advanced techniques such as struvite precipitation and biological nitrification-
denitrification effectively recover these nutrients, achieving up to 100% phosphorus and 99% nitrogen recovery. Integrating these
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 131
techniques enhances the economic viability of wastewater treatment by producing valuable fertilizers from reclaimed water
(Śniatała et al., 2024). Recovered nutrients reduce reliance on synthetic alternatives and mitigate eutrophication risks in natural
water bodies.
Algae cultivation offers a promising bio-based strategy for nutrient removal. This is because algae assimilate excess nitrogen and
phosphorus during growth, and the resulting biomass can be processed into biofuels or other value-added products (Śniatała et al.,
2024). This process addresses nutrient pollution while contributing to renewable energy production, thus reducing reliance on
fossil fuels. The dual function of nutrient removal and biomass generation exemplifies the closed-loop principle of the circular
economy, converting waste into valuable outputs and enhancing soil health.
Energy Generation from Wastewater
Anaerobic digestion processes organic matter in wastewater sludge to produce biogas, a renewable energy source predominantly
composed of methane. This biogas can be harnessed to generate electricity or heat, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and lowering
operational energy costs. Biogas, produced from organic waste, can replace fossil fuels in energy generation, contributing to CO2
neutrality (Chernousenko and Vlasenko, 2024). In Ukraine, biogas production could meet 25% of natural gas consumption,
showcasing its potential as a renewable energy source (Chernousenko and Vlasenko, 2024). The adoption of anaerobic digestion
not only contributes to energy recovery, but also minimizes the volume of residual sludge.
Emerging technologies like Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) convert organic substrates directly into electricity through microbial
metabolic activities. MFCs represent an innovative energy recovery approach that complements conventional anaerobic digestion,
offering potential improvements in energy efficiency and sustainability. Ali et al. (2025), demonstrated that MFCs utilize
microorganisms to convert organic matter into electricity, offering dual benefits of wastewater treatment and energy recovery.
This technology enhances energy efficiency in treatment plants, potentially leading to energy self-sufficiency (Lima et al., 2024).
Wastewater treatment processes often produce excess thermal energy. Heat recovery systems capture and repurpose this energy to
support other operations within the treatment facility, enhancing overall energy efficiency. Recycling waste heat reduces energy
consumption and lowers greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to a more sustainable operational model. Integrating biogas
production with hydroponic farming exemplifies innovative applications that utilize waste heat effectively (Saboohi and Hosseini,
2024).
Key Principles of Circular Economy in Wastewater Management
Key Principles of Circular Economy in Wastewater Management outlines the foundational concepts guiding sustainable
wastewater practices. It emphasizes resource efficiency, transforming waste into valuable resources like water, nutrients, and
energy. Table 2 highlights the importance of closed-loop systems, pollution prevention, and regenerative design to restore
ecosystems. Systemic thinking ensures holistic management, while economic value creation promotes financial sustainability.
Stakeholder engagement and innovation drive effective implementation, supported by robust policies and regulations. Together,
these principles foster a sustainable approach to wastewater management, promoting water reuse and resource recovery, while
reducing environmental impact.
Table 2: Key principles of circular economy in wastewater management
Principle
Description
Application in Wastewater Management
Resource Efficiency
Maximizing the use of resources
while minimizing waste and energy
consumption.
Efficient water use, nutrient recovery, and
energy harvesting from wastewater.
Waste as a Resource
Viewing waste streams as valuable
inputs for new processes.
Recovery of water, nutrients (e.g., nitrogen,
phosphorus), and energy (e.g., biogas).
Closed-Loop Systems
Designing processes that recycle and
reuse materials continuously.
Water reuse systems and recycling of by-
products in treatment plants.
Pollution Prevention
Reducing contaminants at the source
to minimize environmental impact.
Pre-treatment processes and advanced
filtration to improve reuse quality.
Regenerative Design
Creating systems that restore and
regenerate natural ecosystems.
Using treated wastewater for agriculture or
aquifer recharge.
Systemic Thinking
Considering the entire lifecycle and
interconnections of processes.
Integrated water management linking
industries, agriculture, and urban systems.
Economic Value
Creation
Generating economic benefits
through innovative reuse and
recovery strategies.
Revenue from resource recovery (e.g.,
biogas, compost) and reduced water costs.
Stakeholder
Engagement
Involving communities, industries,
and policymakers in circular
Public-private partnerships and community-
driven water reuse programs.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 132
initiatives.
Innovation and
Technology
Leveraging modern technologies to
optimize circular processes.
Smart water monitoring, membrane
filtration, and anaerobic digestion.
Policy and
Regulation
Establishing frameworks to support
and enforce circular practices.
Water reuse regulations, incentives for
resource recovery, and pollution control
CE in Wastewater Management Across Developed and Developing Nations
Developed nations already have advanced wastewater treatment plants that encompass tertiary treatment and resource recovery
systems, which apply membrane filtration, reverse osmosis, and advanced oxidation techniques to ensure high-quality effluent,
that is healthy for reuse in industries, agriculture, and even drinking. However, many regions in developing nations lack
comprehensive wastewater treatment because of infrastructure and funding deficiency. They discharge a substantial amount of
untreated wastewater into the environment, thereby leading to pollution and health hazards. Some of these nations are adopting
cheaper and decentralized treatment systems to enhance coverage.
A comparison on circular economy in Wastewater Management across developed and developing countries is outlined in table 3.
Table 3: Wastewater Management across developed and developing nations
Aspect
Developed Countries
Infrastructure
Advanced wastewater treatment plants with tertiary
treatment and resource recovery systems
Technology
Utilization of advanced filtration (membranes, reverse
osmosis), nutrient recovery, and energy generation from
wastewater
Regulations &
Policies
Strict environmental regulations, water reuse mandates, and
incentives for circular economy practices
Water Reuse &
Recycling
High levels of wastewater reuse in industrial, agricultural,
and municipal sectors
Nutrient
Recovery
Phosphorus and nitrogen recovery for fertilizers widely
implemented
Energy Recovery
Anaerobic digestion for biogas production and energy self-
sufficiency in treatment plants
Public Awareness
& Participation
Strong public engagement, educational campaigns, and
incentives for wastewater recycling
Investment &
Funding
High investment from government and private sectors,
public-private partnerships
Challenges
High operational costs, regulatory compliance, and public
acceptance of recycled water
Developed countries are leading in the implementation of high-tech CE solutions in the management of wastewater, focusing on
water reuse, nutrient recovery, and energy generation. In contrast, developing countries are facing infrastructural and financial
challenges but are making progress through cost-effective, decentralized treatment systems as well as international donor
agencies. Strengthening policies, improving investment, and raising awareness will be key to enhancing circular economy
adoption in global wastewater management.
Advanced Technologies that Support Circular Wastewater Management
Membrane Bioreactors:
Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) represent an advanced wastewater treatment technology that combines biological processes with
membrane filtration to significantly improve water quality for reuse. In MBRs, microorganisms in the biological treatment stage
break down organic pollutants, while the membrane filtration stage removes suspended solids, pathogens, and other contaminants.
Compared to conventional activated sludge processes, MBRs produce higher-quality effluent suitable for industrial, agricultural,
and even potable applications. Their compact design also makes them ideal for urban or decentralized settings. Recent studies
highlight MBRs' efficiency in treating both municipal and industrial wastewater, effectively removing emerging contaminants
like Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). El-Ghorab et al. (2025), demonstrated that MBRs, through optimized
biological treatment and membrane separation, achieve high removal rates of such contaminants, making them a reliable solution
for advanced water treatment.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 133
Electrochemical Treatment:
Electrochemical treatment technologies are gaining traction in wastewater management due to their dual ability to remove
contaminants and recover valuable materials. Utilizing electrolysis, these systems oxidize organic pollutants, disinfect water, and
precipitate harmful substances like heavy metals. They are particularly effective in treating complex industrial effluents, while
offering the added benefit of recovering precious metals such as gold, silver, as well as copper and valuable chemicals, promoting
circular economy principles. Some electrochemical systems also generate electricity during the process, providing an auxiliary
energy source. Ashraf et al. (2024), highlights the enhanced performance of electrocoagulation and Advanced Oxidation
Processes (AOPs) in eliminating both organic and inorganic pollutants. Integrating these methods with MBRs has been shown to
further improve treatment efficiency (Ejairu et al., 2024).
Constructed Wetlands:
Constructed Wetlands (CWs) offer a sustainable, nature-based solution for decentralized wastewater treatment. Mimicking
natural wetlands, these systems use vegetation, soil, and microbial communities to filter and treat wastewater. Plant roots and
microbial biofilms help remove nutrients (e.g., nitrogen and phosphorus), organic matter, and various contaminants. CWs are
especially suited for rural and peri-urban areas that lack centralized treatment facilities. Beyond water treatment, they support bio-
diversity and create green spaces. Ashraf et al. (2024) noted that CWs can contribute to the circular economy by producing high-
quality effluent suitable for agricultural irrigation and other non-potable uses.
Classification of Wastewater Treatment Technologies for Resource Recovery
Classification of Wastewater Treatment Technologies for Resource Recovery categorizes key processes used to treat wastewater
while recovering valuable resources. Table 4 outlines physical, biological, chemical, and advanced methods like membrane and
electrochemical technologies that enable water reuse and resource extraction. Processes such as anaerobic digestion and nutrient
recovery systems focus on reclaiming energy and essential nutrients, while thermal treatments and algal-based systems offer
innovative recovery solutions. Each technology serves specific applications, promoting the circular economy by transforming
wastewater into reusable water, biogas, nutrients, and other valuable by-products, reducing environmental impact and enhancing
resource efficiency.
Table 4: Classification of wastewater treatment technologies for resource recovery
Technology Type
Process Description
Recovered Resource(s)
Typical Applications
Physical Treatment
Mechanical processes that remove
solids and particulates from
wastewater.
Reusable water, solids
Screening, sedimentation,
filtration
Biological
Treatment
Use of microorganisms to break
down organic matter and nutrients.
Biogas, nutrients (N,
P), treated water
Activated sludge, biofilm
reactors, anaerobic digestion
Chemical
Treatment
Addition of chemicals to remove
contaminants and recover specific
compounds.
Nutrients, metals,
treated water
Coagulation-flocculation,
chemical precipitation
Membrane
Technologies
Separation processes using semi-
permeable membranes for water and
solute recovery.
High-quality reclaimed
water, salts
Ultrafiltration, reverse
osmosis, nanofiltration
Anaerobic
Digestion
Breakdown of organic matter
without oxygen, producing biogas.
Biogas (methane),
digestate (fertilizer)
Sludge treatment, energy
recovery
Nutrient Recovery
Systems
Specialized systems to extract
nitrogen and phosphorus from
wastewater.
Struvite, ammonium
sulfate
Struvite crystallization,
ammonia stripping
Thermal Treatment
Use of heat to treat and recover
energy or materials from
wastewater.
Energy, ash (nutrient-
rich)
Incineration, pyrolysis,
hydrothermal processing
Algal-Based
Systems
Use of microalgae to absorb
nutrients and produce biomass.
Biomass (biofuel),
treated water
Algae ponds,
photobioreactors
Electrochemical
Processes
Application of electric currents to
treat and recover valuable
compounds.
Metals, treated water,
hydrogen gas
Electrocoagulation,
electrodialysis
Constructed
Wetlands
Engineered ecosystems that mimic
natural wetlands for treatment.
Treated water, biomass
Decentralized wastewater
treatment, habitat restoration
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 134
Challenges in Implementing Circular Economy Principles in Wastewater Management
Adopting circular economy principles in wastewater management involves addressing several challenges, notably regulatory
frameworks, economic feasibility, and public perception. Table 5 outlines the Challenges of Implementing Circular Economy
Principles in Wastewater Management.
Table 5: Challenges, impacts, and potential solutions
Challenge
Description
Impact on Circular
Economy Implementation
Potential Solutions
High Initial
Investment Costs
Infrastructure upgrades for water
reuse, sludge processing, and
energy recovery are expensive.
Limits adoption, especially
in developing regions.
Public-private
partnerships, government
incentives, and financing
models.
Technological
Limitations
Advanced treatment processes
(e.g., membrane filtration,
nutrient recovery) are still
developing.
Reduces efficiency in
reclaiming water and
resources.
R&D investment in cost-
effective, scalable
solutions.
Regulatory Barriers
Strict discharge standards and
water reuse policies vary by
region.
Legal uncertainty hinders
large-scale
implementation.
Standardized
global/national policies
and regulations.
Public Perception &
Acceptance
Recycled wastewater faces
resistance due to health and
safety concerns.
Reduces demand for
reclaimed water and
biosolids.
Awareness campaigns,
transparent testing, and
certification programs.
Energy-Intensive
Treatment Processes
Some wastewater treatment
methods require high energy
consumption.
Increases operational costs
and carbon footprint.
Integration of renewable
energy (solar, biogas) into
treatment plants.
Complex
Stakeholder
Collaboration
Coordination among
governments, industries, and
communities is challenging.
Slows decision-making
and investment in circular
economy projects.
Establishing multi-sector
partnerships and
governance frameworks.
Lack of Market for
Recovered
Resources
Recycled water, sludge, and
nutrients face low commercial
demand.
Limits the economic
viability of resource
recovery.
Incentivizing circular
economy markets and
creating demand through
policy support.
Microplastics &
Emerging
Contaminants
Current treatment methods may
not fully eliminate
micropollutants.
Reduces water quality and
resource recovery
potential.
Advanced filtration and
research into
biodegradable alternatives.
Infrastructure Age
& Limitations
Many existing wastewater
treatment plants were not
designed for circularity.
Requires significant
retrofitting or new systems.
Gradual system upgrades
and investment in modular,
adaptable technologies.
Data Gaps &
Monitoring
Challenges
Inconsistent tracking of
wastewater reuse and sludge
recovery.
Limits optimization and
scaling of circular
economy initiatives.
Implementation of smart
monitoring and IoT-based
analytics.
Regulatory Frameworks
Compliance with stringent water quality and safety regulations is essential in wastewater reuse and resource recovery. In the
European Union, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) provides a comprehensive legal structure aimed at protecting and
restoring water quality across member states. The WFD mandates that all EU water bodies achieve ‘good’ ecological and
chemical status by 2027, emphasizing pollutant reduction and sustainable water use. This requires wastewater treatment facilities
to align processes with environmental objectives, ensuring reclaimed water meets quality standards for its intended use (Ejairu et
al., 2024).
In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets guidelines to safeguard water quality. The EPA’s
regulations cover various aspects of wastewater treatment and reuse, ensuring that reclaimed water is safe for specific
applications. These standards are designed to protect public health and the environment, requiring treatment plants to meet strict
criteria (Szymański, 2024). Adhering to these frameworks ensures legal compliance while supporting broader goals of
environmental sustainability and public health protection.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 135
Economic Viability
Transitioning to circular wastewater management systems often involves significant initial capital investments. Implementing
advanced treatment technologies, upgrading infrastructure, and establishing resource recovery facilities require substantial
funding, which can be challenging for municipalities with limited budgets. However, long-term economic benefits can outweigh
the initial costs. Resource recovery processes reduce reliance on external water and energy supplies, leading to operational
savings. For example, anaerobic digestion can produce biogas to offset energy expenses, while nutrient recovery (e.g.,
phosphorus and nitrogen) can decrease fertilizer costs. Additionally, selling recovered resources can create new revenue streams,
improving the financial sustainability of wastewater treatment plants (Penserini et al., 2024). To enhance economic viability,
comprehensive cost-benefit analysis, access to funding, and policy incentives that support resource recovery are crucial.
Public Perception
Public acceptance plays a pivotal role in the successful implementation of wastewater reuse initiatives. Despite proven safety
measures, societal resistance often driven by health concerns and the ‘yuck factor’ can hinder adoption. Proactive public
engagement strategies are essential to address these concerns. Educational campaigns highlighting the safety, treatment processes,
and environmental benefits of reclaimed water can increase community awareness. Transparency in sharing water quality data
helps in building of public trust. Furthermore, involving stakeholders through consultations and participatory decision-making
fosters community support for circular wastewater management (Ali and Sultana, 2024).
III. Conclusion
The integration of circular economy principles into wastewater management presents a transformative approach to addressing
global water scarcity and resource depletion. By focusing on the recovery and reuse of water, nutrients, and energy from
wastewater streams, this strategy not only mitigates environmental pollution but also promotes sustainable resource utilization.
Recent studies have underscored the potential of advanced treatment technologies and innovative frameworks in enhancing the
efficiency of resource recovery processes. For instance, the implementation of decentralized wastewater treatment systems has
been shown to facilitate localized water recycling, thereby reducing the burden on centralized infrastructure and conserving
freshwater resources. Additionally, the adoption of eco-innovative technologies like constructed wetlands, has shown
effectiveness in the removal of pollutants and water reuse, especially in decentralized settings. However, the transition towards
circular wastewater management is not without challenges. Economic viability remains a significant concern, as the initial
investment costs for implementing resource recovery systems and treatment infrastructure can be substantial. Moreover, public
perception issues, particularly regarding the safety and acceptability of recycled water, necessitate comprehensive awareness
campaigns and transparent data sharing to build trust and acceptance among stakeholders. Effective communication strategies that
improve confidence in water authorities can reduce these risks and enhance acceptance. Furthermore, educational initiatives
geared towards community needs can promote a better informed public, as observed in studies where higher education levels
correlated with greater acceptance of reclaimed water.
In conclusion, while obstacles persist, the adoption of circular economy strategies in wastewater management offers a promising
pathway towards sustainable water and resource management. Continued research, technological innovation, supportive
regulatory frameworks, and proactive public engagement are essential to fully realize the potential of these approaches in
achieving environmental sustainability and resource efficiency.
References
1. Alam, P., Islam, S. U., Naaz, D., Raina, Y., Mazhar, M. A., and Khan, A. H. (2024). Overview of wastewater treatment,
recycling, and reuse. In CRC Press eBooks (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003454199-1
2. Ali, A. A., and Sultana, N. (2024). Innovative approaches to urban wastewater management. In Advances in electronic
government, digital divide, and regional development book series (pp. 263–286). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-
6740-7.ch011
3. Ali, H. E., Hemdan, B. A., El-Naggar, M. E., El-Liethy, M. A., Jadhav, D. A., El-Hendawy, H. H., Ali, M., and El-
Taweel, G. E. (2025). Harnessing the power of microbial fuel cells as pioneering green technology: advancing
sustainable energy and wastewater treatment through innovative nanotechnology. Bioprocess and Biosystems
Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-024-03115-z
4. Almulhim, A. I., and Abubakar, I. R. (2023). Developing a sustainable water conservation strategy for Saudi Arabian
cities. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 23, 101040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2023.101040
5. Ashraf, M. V., Rather, S. A., Khan, M. H., and Ahmad, S. (2024). Innovative treatment technologies for municipal
wastewater. In CRC Press eBooks (pp. 95–128). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003454199-5
6. Chen, T., Cheng, X., Yan, Y., Wang, S., Su, L., and Tan, C. (2025). From waste leachate to fertilizer: nutrients recovery
via magnesium ammonium phosphate precipitation in a pilot continuous reactor. Elsevier BV.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5091889
7. Chernousenko, O., and Vlasenko, O. (2024). Use of biogas in gas turbines for the production of heat and electricity.
NTU KhPI Bulletin Power and Heat Engineering Processes and Equipment, 1, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-
774x.2024.01.04
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue III, March 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 136
8. Cordeiro, C. M., and Sindhøj, E. (2024). Situating the discourse of recycled nutrient fertilizers in circular economy
principles for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1465752
9. Ejairu, N. U., Aderamo, N. a. T., Olisakwe, N. H. C., Esiri, N. a. E., Adanma, N. U. M., and Solomon, N. N. O. (2024).
Eco-friendly wastewater treatment technologies (concept): Conceptualizing advanced, sustainable wastewater treatment
designs for industrial and municipal applications. Comprehensive Research and Reviews in Engineering and
Technology, 2(1), 083–104. https://doi.org/10.57219/crret.2024.2.1.0063
10. El-Ghorab, H. M., Azeem, M. M. A., Badawy, M. I., Gad-Allah, T. A., Abdel-Wahed, M. S., and Momen, M. A. (2025).
Navigating the Membrane Bioreactors Operational Parameters in Eliminating Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater:
A Review. Egyptian Journal of Chemistry, 0(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2025.332819.10710
11. Jin, P. (2021). Cutting-edge technology and systems for water treatment and reuse. In IWA Publishing eBooks.
https://doi.org/10.2166/9781789064513
12. Kaviya, S. (2022). Recent advances in water treatment facilities for wastewater reuse in the urban water supply. In
Current directions in water scarcity research (pp. 361–379). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91838-1.00027-0
13. Lima, D., Li, L., and Appleby, G. (2024). A review of Renewable Energy Technologies in Municipal Wastewater
Treatment Plants (WWTPs). Energies, 17(23), 6084. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17236084
14. Lima, U. T. G. M., Da Silva, G. L., and Sobral, M. D. C. M. (2025). Circular economy and water resources management.
Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 19(1), e010807. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n1-056
15. Mani, V., Sathiasivan, K., and Jeyalakshmi, R. (2024). Optimization and modeling of process parameters for nutrient
recovery from sewage wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 90(6), 1744–1758.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.301
16. Martin-Hernandez, E., Omelon, S., Vaneeckhaute, C., and Ruiz-Mercado, G. J. (2024). Phosphorus recovery in
municipal wastewater and socioeconomic impacts in Canada and the United States. ACS ESandT Water.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00569
17. Nwamekwe, C. O. and Okpala, C. C. (2025). Circular Economy Strategies in Industrial Engineering: From Theory to
Practice. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 6(1),
https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250212103754_MGE-2025-1-288.1.pdf
18. Obiuto, N. C., Olu-Lawal, N. K., Ani, N. E., Ugwuanyi, N. E. and Ninduwezuor-Ehiobu, N. N. (2024). Chemical
engineering and the circular water economy: Simulations for sustainable water management in environmental systems.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(3), 001–009. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.3.0647
19. Okpala, C. C., Udu, C. E. and Nwamekwe, C. O. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Total Productive Maintenance:
The Future of Maintenance in Smart Factories. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 21,
iss. 1, https://ijerd.com/paper/vol21-issue1/21016874.pdf
20. Okpala, C. C. and Udu, C. E. (2025). Artificial Intelligence Applications for Customized Products Design in
Manufacturing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, vol. 6, iss. 1,
https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20250212104938_MGE-2025-1-307.1.pdf
21. Okpala, S. C. and Okpala, C. C. (2024). The Application of Artificial Intelligence to Digital Healthcare in the Nigerian
Tertiary Hospitals: Mitigating the Challenges. Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 20, iss. 4,
http://ijerd.com/paper/vol20-issue4/20047681.pdf
22. Panda, A., and Panda, A. K. (2024). Waste Water Circularity And Its Related Incentives In India. International Journal
of Advanced Research, 12(12), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/20025
23. Penserini, L., Cantoni, B., and Antonelli, M. (2024). Modelling the impacts generated by reclaimed wastewater reuse in
agriculture: From literature gaps to an integrated risk assessment in a One Health perspective. Journal of Environmental
Management, 371, 122715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122715
24. Racheeti, P. B. (2024). Water Crisis Escalation: Global Challenges And Urgent Imperatives-Review. International
Journal of Advanced Research, 12(02), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/18348
25. Saboohi, Z., and Hosseini, S. E. (2024). Advancements in biogas production: process optimization and innovative plant
operations. Clean Energy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae096
26. Śniatała, B., Al-Hazmi, H. E., Sobotka, D., Zhai, J., and Mąkinia, J. (2024). Advancing sustainable wastewater
management: A comprehensive review of nutrient recovery products and their applications. The Science of the Total
Environment, 937, 173446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173446
27. Szymański, K. (2024). Reuse of treated municipal wastewater for the production of water for agriculture. Rocznik
Ochrona Środowiska, 26, 684–690. https://doi.org/10.54740/ros.2024.059
28. Wang, Z., Skerlos, S. J., and Novak, P. J. (2024). Nitrogen and Phosphorus Recovery from Anthropogenic Liquid Waste
Streams. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49(1), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-
112320-082121