INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 155
Physico-Chemical and Microstructural Analysis of Al-Mg-Si Alloy
Matrix Composites Reinforced Groundnut Shell ash Particulates
*
1
Benjamin U. Odoni.,
2
Elvis Emifoniye and
3
Ochuko G. Utu
1
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Delta State Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1030, Ogwashi-Uku, Nigeria.
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delta State Polytechnic, P.M.B. 1030, Ogwashi-Uku, Nigeria.
3
Department of Welding and Fabrication Technology, Delta State Polytechnic Ogwashi-Uku, Nigeria.
*
Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130718
Received: 18 July 2024; Accepted: 06 August 2024; Published: 20 August 2024
Abstract
Metal matrix composites are an appealing alternative to monolithic metals for a variety of technical applications due to their
superior mechanical and physical properties throughout a broad range of operating conditions. In the current study, different
weight percentages of 150 µm groundnut shell ash (GNSA) particles (2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 17.5%, 20%, 25% and
30%) were used to reinforce Al-Mg-Si alloy. Stir-casting was used to prepare the composite in a permanent mild steel mould. A
number of the composites' physical, chemical, and microstructural characteristics (density, percentage porosity, XRF and SEM-
EDS) were assessed, compared, and analysed with those of the matrix alloy. Oxides that could enhance the composites'
mechanical, physical, and structural qualities were found during the structural assessment evaluation of the reinforcement. The
microstructural analysis demonstrated that the GNSA reinforcements' secondary phase was uniformly distributed throughout the
primary phase of the Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix. The added GNSA particles decreased the produced composite's density below that of
the base alloy, and the percentage porosity of the composites rose as the groundnut shell ash content increased and remained
within the upper limit allowed for cast aluminium metal matrix composites. The composites that were created showed evidence of
intermetallic compound formation.
Keywords - Al-Mg-Si, Groundnut shell ash, AA6061 matrix composite, Percent porosity, Microstructural.
I. Introduction
Aluminium is the most widely used metal after steel because of its versatility. Stronger, lighter, and less expensive materials are
required for engineering applications. Some of the property combinations that distinguish aluminium 6061 metal matrix
composites include high specific strength, a low coefficient of thermal expansion, high thermal resistance, good damping
capacities, superior wear resistance, high specific stiffness, and acceptable corrosion resistance [1]-[9]. Metal matrix composites
(MMCs) are rapidly replacing traditional monolithic metallic alloys in a wide range of industries, including aerospace,
automotive, and defence [1], [10]-[14]. The high expense of using standard reinforcements such as silica (SiO
2
), tungsten (W),
calcium oxide (CaO), aluminium oxide (Al
2
O
3
), silicon carbide (SiC), titanium carbide (TiC), and so on limits the applications for
aluminium metal matrix composites (AMMCs) [6], [11]. As a result of current industrial advances, aluminium alloy composites
are becoming increasingly essential in engineering applications. Because of its ability to improve the many properties of the
composite material, the use of agricultural waste ash in reinforcementsuch as groundnut shell ash (GNSA), rice husk ash
(RHA), palm kernel shell ash (PKSA), corn cob ash (CCA), coconut shell ash (CSA), bamboo leaf ash (BLA), etc.is becoming
increasingly important [15]-[20]. The quantity of waste generated by industrial, mining, and agricultural processes has expanded
dramatically as a result of worldwide population growth and growing living standards caused by technological improvements.
The amount of waste produced is beginning to concern environmentalists and citizens worldwide [21], [22]. Aluminium matrix
composites (AMCs) are now manufactured utilising a variety of traditional and unique processes. The processing technique
determines the properties of AMCs. Although a liquid process, such as casting, is simpler and less expensive, its use is limited
due to the reinforcement's low wettability in molten aluminium. Stir casting is the preferred method for manufacturing aluminium
metal matrix composites due to its cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and ability to make large and complicated parts [3], [23]-[25].
Using waste materials could reduce environmental contamination, and recycling waste materials by converting them into valuable
resources for the automotive, aerospace, and construction industries could keep natural disasters from occurring [11], [26]-[29]. It
has been discovered that agricultural waste ashes contain high concentrations of refractory minerals that can be used to make
composites, such as alumina (Al
2
O
3
), silica (SiO
2
), hematite (Fe
2
O
3
), carbonate (CaCO
3
), and calcium (Ca).
II. Materials and Methods
A. Materials
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 156
The materials used was Al-Mg-Si alloy as the matrix material which was obtained from Alna Aluminium Inc., China. Groundnut
shell ash (GNSA) particulate as the reinforcement material which was obtained from Ogwashi-Uku, located at a longitude: of
6
o
10’41” N and latitude: 6
o
31’28” E, Delta State, Nigeria
B. Experimental Methods
1) Collection and preparation of groundnut shell:
The gathered groundnut shells were cleansed with warm water, sun-dried for two weeks, and then processed into a fine powder in
the Ogwashi-Uku market using a locally fabricated grain (wheat, corn, beans, etc.) grinding machine. 1000 g of pulverised
groundnut shell powder was put in stages into a muffle furnace and ashed at 500 °C for one hour [11], [30]. The temperature and
duration utilised for ashing were determined after multiple attempts and are intended to allow for complete ash production while
maintaining a single-phase material. The optimal ashing was virtually observed at 500
o
C for one hour. The ashing was conducted
at 450
o
C, 500
o
C, 550
o
C, and 600
o
C for 45 minutes, one hour, one hour 15 minutes, and one hour 30 minutes [30]. The
powdered groundnut shell ash is displayed in Fig. 1(a).
Fig. 1. (a) Groundnut shell ash powder
2) Groundnut shell ash particle size analysis:
Groundnut shell ash particles size analysis was carried out at the Delta State Polytechnic, Ogwashi-Uku's Metallurgical
Engineering Laboratory. For complete categorisation, 1000 g GNSA was placed in a sequence of decreasing fineness sieves and
shaken for 15 min [11]. Material retained below the 150 µm sieve was used in this study as GNSA particles.
3) Stir casting:
The metal matrix composite was fabricated in metallurgical engineering laboratory of Delta State Polytechnic, Ogwashi-Uku
using stir casting method. The sample was prepared by varying the weight percentage of reinforcing material (Groundnut Shell
Ash) particles at an interval of 2.5 wt % from 0 to 30 wt % with, remaining balance being Al-Mg-Si alloy matrix. It means
splitting the matrix into different PKSA weights. The aluminium alloy was melted in a stainless steel melting pot that had been
pre-heated by a muffle furnace. The furnace was heated to ± 700
o
C for three hours. The GNSA particles were heat treated in an
oven at 50
o
C for three hours to promote wettability and temperature equalization before they were charged into the molten
aluminium. The alloy was fully melted in the furnace by increasing the temperature to 750
o
C, then cooled to 600
o
C to preserve a
semi-solid state. At this step, the preheated particles of groundnut shell ash were added and manually stirred using a steel stirring
rod in accordance with [31]-[32]. The composite slurry was manually mixed, then heated to 750
o
C in the furnace before being
put into a 200 mm long by 16 mm diameter permanent cylindrical mould that had been preheated [30, 32]. Fig. 1. (b) and (c)
display the representative cast composites and mild steel permanent mould respectively.
Fig. 1. (b) As-cast AA6063/GNSA composites, (c) Fabricated permanent mould
4) Determination of density of produced composites:
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 157
The cleaned Al-Mg-Si/GNSA composite samples were carefully weighed on an electrical scale before being submerged in water.
The weight of the sample in water was determined, and the sample's volume was computed using the Archimedes principle,
which takes into account the effect of water displacement. Eq. (1)'s expression was used to calculate the experimental density, and
the experimental density of the composite was tabulated (Table 1).

󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜
Eq. (1)
5) Determination of percentage porosity of produced composites:
Using an electrical scale, the measured weight of a test sample was divided by its measured volume to determine the experimental
density of each grade of composite produced. The percentage porosity of the composites was evaluated by comparing the
experimental and theoretical densities for each composition of the composites formed (Table 2). The percent porosity was
calculated using the relation (Eq. (2)) [11], [30].

󰇡


󰇢

Eq. (2)
Where
 and

.
6) Chemical analysis of groundnut shell ash particulate:
XRF technique was used to examine the chemical composition of the groundnut shell ash particle (reinforcement). An energy
dispersive x-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer type known as "Minipal 4" was used in this experiment to determine the
reinforcement's oxide levels, both quantitatively and qualitatively. XRF identifies elements between sodium (Na, Z = 11) to
uranium (U, Z = 92) with excellent resolution and fast analysis.
7) Microstructural evaluation of the produced composites:
Using a JSM 7600F Jeol ultra-high resolution field emission gun scanning electron microscope (FEG-SEM) equipped with an
EDS, the microstructural properties and qualitative element composition of the composites were fully investigated.
III. Results and Discussion
A. Density
The results of the density measurement of Al-Mg-Si with varying weight percentage additions of GNSA are shown in Table 1.
The result shows that as groundnut shell ash addition to the matrix increases, the density of the Al-Mg-Si/GNSA reinforced alloy
decreases. The research findings from [11] were consistent with this pattern. The density of the Al-Mg-Si/GNSA reinforced
composites was 2.62 g/cm
3
when 2.5 weight percent of GNSA was added; however, at 30 weight percent, it decreased to 2.04
g/cm
3
. This is due to the fact that GNSA particles are less dense than those of aluminium alloy, and studies have indicated that
employing GNSA to create lightweight composites suitable for automotive applications may result in energy savings.
Table 1: Experimental density of Al-Mg-Si/GNSA composite
Compositions of GNSA (%)
Experimental density (g/cm3)
0
2.68
2.5
2.62
5
2.57
7.5
2.52
10
2.47
12.5
2.42
15
2.37
17.5
2.32
20
2.27
25
2.15
30
2.04
B. Percentage Porosity
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 158
The porosity of the final composites provides an explanation for the difference between the experimental and theoretical densities
divided by the theoretical densities of the composites. Porosity was shown to increase with the number of GNSA particles that
served as reinforcement. The porosity level is caused by either trapped air or low wettability of the reinforcement [33]. High
porosity leads to poor strength and mechanical properties [33]. The results showed that the apparent porosity values of the
composites increased slightly as the weight percentage of GNSA added increased as illustrates in Table 2. The porosity of the
reinforced composite was 1.14% at 2.5 weight percent of GNSA addition and 2.86% at 30 weight percent of GNSA addition. The
value of the reinforcement raises the proportion of pores and voids in the AMMC. But the percentage porosity of every composite
that was produced was less than the maximum permitted for cast metal matrix composites [11], [32]-[34].
Table 2: Percent porosity of Al-Mg-Si/GNSA composite
Compositions of
GNSA (%)
Theoretical
density (g/cm3)
Experimental density
(g/cm3)
Porosity (%)
0
2.70
2.68
0.74
2.5
2.65
2.62
1.14
5
2.60
2.57
1.16
7.5
2.55
2.52
1.19
10
2.50
2.47
1.21
12.5
2.45
2.42
1.24
15
2.40
2.37
1.27
17.5
2.35
2.32
1.30
20
2.30
2.27
1.33
25
2.20
2.15
2.27
30
2.10
2.04
2.86
C. Chemical Analysis
1) X-ray fluorescent spectrophotometer (XRF) results of groundnut shell ash (GNSA):
Table 3 shows the chemical composition of the GNSA (in oxide form) based on XRF analysis. According to Table 3, the
concentrations of SiO
2
, Fe
2
O
3
, Al
2
O
3
, P
2
O
5
, and K
2
O appear to be higher in the following oxides. Increased levels of phosphorus,
silica, alumina, and other oxides were verified by [6], [15], [31]. Because groundnut shells include hard components including
SiO
2
, Al
2
O
3
, Fe
2
O
3
, and K
2
O, they can be used as particle reinforcement in metal matrices composites. As a result, the study's
findings suggest that employing GNSA as a particle reinforcement in the creation of metal matrix composites is feasible. Due to
their similar chemical composition, the XRF results are compatible with different particle organic and agricultural waste
reinforcements used in matrix composites, such as rice husk ash, coconut shell, periwinkle shell, and bagasse ash [11], [28], [33].
Fig. 2 shows the elemental composition of the GNSA particles. The elements that are present in the sample (GNSA) could be
determined using peak search or peak match. A mathematical method called peak search is used to locate the peaks in a spectrum.
Peak match can also determines the elements to which the peak profiles belong. This analysis made use of peak match Fig. 2. The
positions of the peaks are compared to a database containing the positions of every feasible line to achieve this [35].
Table 3: XRF oxide analysis of the groundnut shell ash (GNSA)
Compound (Oxide)
Conc. (%)
SiO
2
49.91
Al
2
O
3
8.97
Fe
2
O
3
8.94
MgO
3.68
P
2
O
5
2.41
Na
2
O
2.02
TiO
2
0.23
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 159
MnO
0.14
CaO
6.04
K
2
O
8.11
CuO
0.07
ZnO
0.04
Ni
2
O
0.004
Cl
5.45
SrO
0.61
Others
≤0.28
LOI
3.32
Fig. 2 XRF spectra showing the elemental composition of the groundnut shell ash (GNSA) particles.
D. Microstructural examination
Fig. 3 displays representative morphological properties of the unreinforced Al-Mg-Si alloy (0 weight percent GNSA). Fig. 3
vividly shows a variety of needle-like features which were also observed by [36]. Since Mg promotes the liquid-vapour surface
tension and Si especially acts on the contact angle, these elements are crucial to the infiltration of GNSA preforms because they
affect the aluminium alloy's wetting behaviour [36].
However, the inclusion of GNSA particles in the composite containing 10 weight percent GNSA particles results in toughening
mechanisms (Fig. 4). The morphology showed that the secondary phase of the GNSA reinforcements was evenly dispersed
throughout the aluminium matrix's main phase. The EDS result of the unreinforced alloy (0 weight percent GNSA) contained the
elements Al, Mg, Si, C, Fe, Cr, Mn, O, and Cu, while the matrix composite Al-Mg-Si reinforced with 10 weight percent GNSA
particles had the elements Al, Mg, Si, C, Fe, C, O, and Cu (Fig 3). The alloy's microstructural study reveals the existence of
Mg
2
Si and AlFeSiMn as intermetallic phases in addition to an intermetallic grain. The needle-shaped AlFeSiMn intermetallic was
found by the SEM and EDS investigations. Further studies by [36], indicate that the presence of Fe and Mn impurities in
aluminium causes the intermetallic phase to develop.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 160
Fig. 3 SEM-EDS micrograph of Al-Mg-Si alloy as-cast
Fig. 4 SEM-EDS micrograph of Al-Mg-Si/10%GNSA
IV. Conclusion
Drawing from the results, one may deduce the following:
To make the Al-Mg-Si/GNSA composites, double stir casting was employed. GNSA can be used as a reinforcement material
while creating AMMCs because of its strong oxides. The density of Al-Mg-Si/GNSA composites decreased with an increase in
groundnut shell ash content. This implies that the creation of lightweight metal composites may benefit from the use of groundnut
shell ash particles as reinforcement. Al-Mg-Si aluminium alloy can be infused with groundnut shell ash particles to create
lightweight, low-cost aluminium composites with improved structural and physico-mechanical properties.
Declaration of Competing Interest
In terms of potential competing interests, the following financial and interpersonal relationships are declared by the authors:
According to Elvis Emifoniye, the Tertiary Education Trust Fund provided the financial support.
Acknowledgement
The Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TET Fund), Nigeria, is acknowledged by the authors for providing financial support for this
study via the Institution Based Research (IBR) Interventions programme.
References
1. J. Agunsoye, S. Talabi, S. Bello and I. Awe, "The effects of cocos nucifera (coconut shell) on the mechanical and
tribological properties of recycled waste aluminium can composites," Tribology in Industry, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 155-162,
2014.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 161
2. M. Abdulwahab, R. Dodo, I. Suleiman, A. Gebi and I. Umar, "Wear Behavior of Al-7%Si-0.3%Mg/melon shell ash
particulate composites," Heliyon, vol. 3, no. 8, art. ID e00375, 2017.
3. K. K. Alaneme and B. J. Bamike, "Characterization of mechanical and wear properties of aluminium based composites
reinforced with quarry dust and silicon carbide," Ain Shams Engineering Journal/Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 9,
no. 4, p. 28152821, 2018.
4. Apasi, D. Yawas, S. Abdulkareem and M. Kolawole, "Improving mechanical properties of aluminium alloy through
addition of coconut shell-ash," Journal of Science Technology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 34-43, 2016.
5. K. K. Alaneme, B. O. Ademilua and M. O. Bodunrin, "Mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of aluminium
hybrid composites reinforced with silicon carbide, and bamboo leaf ash," Tribology in Industry, vol. 1, no. 35, pp. 25-35,
2013.
6. K. Alaneme, T. Adewale and P. Olubambi, "Corrosion and wear behaviour of AlMgSi alloy matrix hybrid composites
reinforced with rice husk ash and silicon carbide," Journal of Materials Research Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9-16,
2014.
7. R. Arunachalam, .. Krishnan and R. Muraliraja, "A review on the production of metal matrix composites through stir
castingFurnace design, properties, challenges, and research opportunities," Journal of Manufacturing Process, vol. 42,
pp. 213-245, 2019.
8. P. K. Bannaravuri and A. K. Birru, "Strengthening of Al-4.5%Cu alloy with the addition of Silicon Carbide and Bamboo
Leaf Ash," International Journal of Structural Integrity, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 149161, 2019.
9. V. Chak, H. Chattopadhyay and T. Dora, "A review on fabrication methods, reinforcements and mechanical properties
of aluminum matrix composites," Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 56, pp. 1059-1074, 2020.
10. H. Chauhan and C. A. Irfan, "Variation of mechanical properties (tensile strength h & microstructure) of Al6061 /
(Al2O3 and fly ash), hybrid metal matrix composite produced by stir casting," International Research Journal of
Engineering and Technology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2407-2414, 2017.
11. F. O. Edoziuno, A. A. Adediran, B. U. Odoni, O. G. Utu and A. Olayanju, "Physico-chemical and morphological
evaluation of palm kernel shell particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites," Materials Today: Proceedings, p.
652657, 2021.
12. F. O. Edoziuno, B. U. Odoni, F. I. Alo and C. C. Nwaeju, "Dry Sliding Wear And Surface Morphological Examination
of An Aluminium Matrix Composite Reinforced With Palm Kernel Shell," Acta Metallurgica Slovaca, vol. 26, no. 2, p.
5462, 2020.
13. R. Fakhir and R. J. Shawnim, "The Effectiveness of Reinforcement and Processing on Mechanical Properties, Wears
Behaviour and Damping Response of Aluminium Matrix Composites," High Temp. Mater. Proc,, pp. 327-939, 2019.
14. Gireesh, P. K. Durga, K. Ramji and P. Vinay, "Mechanical characterization of aluminium metal matrix composite
reinforced with aloe vera powder," Materials Today: Procedings, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 3289-3297, 2018.
15. K. Hemanth, B. Siddeswarappa and P. K. Prasanna, "A Review on Mechanical Behavior of Aluminium 6061 Reinforced
with different Agro Ashes," International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology
(IJRASET), vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 382-388, 2020.
16. Y. S. Idawu, K. Auwal, T. M. Abdullahi and M. Z. Sirajo, "Evaluation of Mechanical, Microstructures and Wear
Behaviours of Aluminium Alloy Reinforced with Mussel Shell Powder for Automobile Applications," Journal of
Mechanical Engineering, vol. 67, no. 1-2, pp. 27-35, 2021.
17. P. P. Ikubanni, M. Oki, A. A. Adeleke and P. O. Omoniyi, "Synthesis, physico-mechanical and microstructural
characterization of Al6063/SiC/PKSA hybrid reinforced composites," Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.
18. H. Kala, K. Mer and S. Kumar, "A review on mechanical and tribological behaviors of stir cast aluminum matrix
composites," Procedia Materials Science, vol. 6, pp. 1951-1960, 2014.
19. P. P. Kulkarni, B. Siddeswarappa and K. S. H. Kumar, "A Survey on Effect of Agro Waste Ash as Reinforcement on
Aluminium Base Metal Matrix Composites," Open Journal of Composite Materials, vol. 09, no. 03, p. 312326, 2019.
20. B. P. Kumar and A. K. Birru, "Microstructure and mechanical properties of Aluminium metal matrix composites with
addition of bamboo leaf ash by stir casting method," Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed.), vol. 27, no. 12, p.
25552572, 2017.
21. L. Lancaster, M. Lung and D. Sujan, "Utilization of agro-industrial waste in metal matrix composites: Towards
sustainability," International Journal of Environmental, Ecological, Geomatics, Earth Science and Engineering, vol. 7,
no. 1, pp. 35-43, 2013.
22. S. Nallusamy, S. Saravanan, V. Kannarasu and M. R. Narayanan, ""Experimental Analysis on Reinforced Aluminium
Metal Matrix with Boron Carbide, Graphite and Fly Ash Chemical Composites"," Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 2017.
23. K. Padmavathi, R. Ramakrishnan and K. P. Kumar, "Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite-An Insight into Solid State
and Liquid State Processes," Applied Mechanics and Materials, pp. 766767, 234239, 2015.
24. T. Rajmohan, K. Palanikumar and S. Ranganathan, "Evaluation of mechanical and wear properties of hybrid aluminium
matrix composites," Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23, pp. 2509-2517, 2013.
25. M. Satheesh and M. Pugazhvadivu, "Investigation on physical and mechanical properties of Al6061-Silicon Carbide
(SiC)/Coconut shell ash (CSA) hybrid composites," Physica. B, Condensed Matter, 572, p. 7075, 2019.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VII, July 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 162
26. V. Sharma, R. Singh and R. Chaudhary, "Effect of fly ash particles with aluminium melt on the wear of aluminium metal
matrix composites," Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 13181323, 2017.
27. F. Tugiman, F. Taher, M. Hasibuan and Suprianto, "The analysis of composite properties reinforced with particles from
palm oil industry waste produced by casting methods," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vols.
277, art. ID 012028, 2017.
28. R. Umunakwe, D. J. Olaleye, A. Oyetunji, O. C. Okoye and I. J. Umunakwe, "Assessment of some mechanical
properties and microstructure of particulate periwinkle shell-aluminium 6063 metal matrix composite (PPS-ALMMC)
produced by two-step casting," Nigerian Journal of Technology, 36(2), 421, 2017.
29. Usman, R. A., M. Hassan and N. Waziri, "A comparative study on the properties of Al-7%Si-rice husk ash and Al-7%Si-
bagasse ash composites produced by stir casting," International of Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1-7,
2014.
30. Odoni, B. Onyekpe and O. Awheme, "Evaluation of Palm Kernel Shell Ash Particle Reinforced Aluminium 6061 Alloy
Matrix Composites Using Physio-Chemical and Microstructural Methods," Journal of Materials Engineering, Structures
and Computation 3(1) 2024, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 52-61, 2024.
31. F. Edoziuno, A. Adediran, B. Odoni, O. Utu and A. Olayanju, "Physico-chemical and morphological evaluation of palm
kernel shell particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites," Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020.
32. O. Oladele and A. M. Okoro, "The effect of palm kernel shell ash on the mechanical properties of as-cast aluminium
alloy matrix composites," Leonardo Journal of Sciences, no. 28, pp. 15-30, 2016.
33. R. Umunakwe, D. Olaleye, A. Oyetunji, O. Okoye and I. Umunakwe, "Assessment of the density and Mechanical
Properties Of Particulate Periwinkle Shell-Aluminium 6063 Metal Matrix Composite (PPS-Almmc) Produced By Two-
Step Casting," Acta Technica Corviniensis, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 83-90, April 2017a.
34. K. Alaneme and B. U. Odoni, "Mechanical properties, wear and corrosion behavior of copper matrix composites
reinforced with steel machining chips," Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal, vol. 19, no. 3, p.
15931599, 2016.
35. P. Brouwer, "THEORY OF XRF. PANalytical B.V.," 2010. [Online]. Available:
https://www.iotcco.com/uploads/VirtualTeaching/Articles/PANanalytical. [Accessed 30 July 2024].
36. R. P.-C. M. Escalera-Lozano, M. A. Pech-Canul, M. Montoya-Dávila and A. Uribe-Salas, "The Role of Mg2Si in the
Corrosion Behavior of Al-Si-Mg Alloys for Pressureless Infiltration," The Open Corrosion Journal, pp. 73-79, 2010.
37. N. Chandla, K. Yashpal, C. Jawalkar and N. Suri, "Review on analysis of stir casting aluminium metal matrix
composites from agro-industrial waste," i-Manager’s Journal of Materials Science, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 35-46, 2017.