INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue V, May 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 92
As regards mapping, the UAVs had different levels of accuracy and resolution. For example, Drone C was noted for obtaining
mapping accuracy of 97.1% at a pixel resolution of 7 centimeters which means that it was an ideal machine for making high
resolution maps over vast terrains. Such maps are very important in environmental assessments since they give precise spatial
data that can be used to monitor ecosystems and trace changes in them across time.
The other essential point to be noted was the accuracy of geotagging. Drone C was again the best in this four types of drones as it
had a success rate of 98.1% in terms of geotagging. Such precision is crucial for correct pairing of geographical data with
environmental information thereby improving efficiency of monitoring systems as a whole.
Accuracy of UAVs in Perimeter Monitoring, Environmental Information Gathering, and Fish Behavior Tracking
The accuracy of UAVs in terms of real-time surveillance and detection, mapping, and georeferencing was also evaluated. Among
the drones, Drone C was found to be the most accurate one with a detection accuracy of 94.4%, so that it has more capacity to
reduce false alarms. High detection precision is particularly important in guaranteeing prompt and dependable perimeter
monitoring which is paramount for security as well as environmental safeguarding.
UAV mapping accuracies differed from device-to-device wherein Drone C had the best mapping precision of about 97.1% on a
total area of 12 square kilometers. In environmental monitoring, having proper maps fast enough is fundamental since this
enables the accurate identification of changes happening within ecosystems and resources.
Acknowledgment
This Research would not have been made possible without the guidance and help of several individuals who, in one way or
another have contributed and extended their valuable assistance in the preparation and completion of this study.
First and foremost I would like to thank our Almighty God for giving the blessings during this research.
Many thanks also go out to the administrative personnel at AMA University for providing logistics support and ensuring that
everything I needed was within reach.
Finally, I owe my deepest acknowledgments to my family and friends for their continued encouragement throughout this whole
journey.
References
1. Bhardwaj, R., Sharma, K., & Singh, A. (2020). Applications of unmanned aerial vehicles in agriculture. *Journal of
Agricultural Engineering*, 57(4), 329-336.
2. Choi, Y., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Kim, M. (2019). Application of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for aquaculture. *Journal
of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education*, 31(5), 123-131.
3. Gonzales, J. M., Gacusan, R. L., & Panganiban, L. M. (2021). Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) monitoring and
surveillance system for aquaculture farming in the Philippines. *Aquaculture Research and Development*, 12(3), 1-8.
4. Huang, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2020). Review on applications of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in
precision agriculture. *Journal of Agricultural Engineering*, 57(3), 197-211.
5. Liu, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., & Li, X. (2019). Application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in aquaculture. *Fisheries
Science and Technology Information*, 46(4), 1-5.
6. Ou, X., Liu, Y., Li, X., & Luo, Y. (2020). Applications of unmanned aerial vehicles in forestry: A review. *Journal of
Forestry Research*, 31(2), 357-375. Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B1-2020, 451-456.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b1-2020-451-2020
7. Xie, Y., Wang, L., Wang, H., & Zhang, J. (2021). Application of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for environmental
monitoring: A review. *Environmental Monitoring and Assessment*, 193(4), 1-16.
8. Wang, X., F. Rottensteiner, and C. Heipke. 2019. βStructure from Motion for Ordered and Unordered Image Sets Based
on Random K-d Forests and Global Pose Estimation.β ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 147: 19β
41. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.009.