INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 116
Feedback in Linear Programming: Students’ Perceptions at AYO
Secondary School of Nkeyema District in the Western Part of
Zambia: A Hermeneutic Tactic
Chrispine Mulenga Mwambazi, Simeon Mbewe, Francise Simui
Institute of Distance Education, UNZA, Zambia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130814
Received: 30 July 2024; Accepted: 14 August 2024; Published: 14 September 2024
Abstract: The foundation of teaching strategies in school environments is feedback. Nonetheless, it needs to be communicated
clearly because it is frequently misinterpreted. Due to the negative comments, they gained through their actual internships,
students lacked confidence and felt unable to practice their talents. They also felt that receiving comments made it difficult for
them to finish their useful exercises. In the western Zambian region of Nkeyema, AYO Secondary School was the site of this
investigation. An interpretivist approach was used in an exploratory qualitative design. Eleven (11) secondary school pupils in
total and each student was questioned separately. With the participants' consent, all interviews were audio recorded using a digital
voice recorder and then verbatim transcriptions were made. After that, qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the data
thematically.
The study's main themes included how participants perceived the feedback they received in the classroom, the implication of
feedback and strategies for improving feedback in the classroom. Despite the difficulties with group feedback and the strong
emotions it evoked, students valued the input they received in linear programming. Pupils ought to be ready to receive the
feedback with greater openness.
Keywords: Education, linear programming, teaching, feedback
I. Introduction
Feedback is essential for enhancing learners' performance in linear programming (LP) because it offers timely, precise, and useful
information that aids in understanding errors, reinforcing proper processes, and fostering the development of problem-solving
abilities. Feedback is the process by which students analyse remarks made about the value of their work in order to enhance
future performance or learning strategies (Carless 2019).
It is one of the essential elements of teaching strategies that should be applied throughout the educational process. Important
people in each unit assist students in identifying learning opportunities so they can acquire new skills. According to González-
García et al. (2020), education is therefore seen as essential to students' acquisition of abilities during their learning, where
competences are noted.
Students grow in capability, competence, and compassion as a result (Dasila et al. 2016). Students gain knowledge by applying
concepts, thinking back on their experiences, and receiving feedback. Feedback enables students to analyze the discrepancy
between their actual and predicted performance and devise strategies for improving it. More significantly, it promotes experiential
learning and reflective thinking by getting students to think back on their thoughts, emotions, and encounters (Hardavella et al.
2017). Even though it is well acknowledged that feedback is an essential part of education, teachers still find it difficult to give it
(Weinstein, 2015).
II. Background
Feedback helps learners identify and correct misunderstandings and mistakes. By receiving specific feedback on errors in
formulating constraints or objective functions, learners can better grasp linear programming concepts and avoid repeating the
same. Education frequently uses its curricula; where knowledge is imparted by gradually building upon one another. Typically,
the theoretical portion is taught in a classroom setting or online through learning management systems.
Dobrowolska et al. (2015) assert that education is a multifaceted, complicated environment. The teaching environment and the
supervisory relationships between students and teachers make up dyadic approach to learning in education (Rajeswaran, 2017).
The most crucial element of student assessment and learning facilitation is feedback, which is provided by the school foundation
that supports the educational system. This suggests that one of the systems of support in place to help facilitate students'
proficient growth is feedback.
There are various types of feedback that are given to and received by students in linear programming. These include written, oral,
and informal feedback. Students also receive feedback that is directional, facilitative, and constructive.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 117
The latter is typically administered during the midterm exams. When feedback informs a pupil about necessary changes, it's
considered directive. Comments or recommendations that encourage students to make their own revisions and changes are
helpful.
When feedback is given in a suitable interpersonal setting and is comprehensive, thorough, and well-planned, it is considered
constructive. In addition, the recipient must expect it to be based on first-hand information on students' performance rather than
generalizations. During revisions, teachers could encourage students to express their commitment, empathy, courtesy, civility
regarding others, and discernment (Houghton, 2016).
Peer feedback is commonly employed in educational contexts, especially following peer observations, despite students' reluctance
to offer criticism on their peers' behaviors and their difficulty balancing critical and positive input (Pedram et al. 2020). Thus, it is
clear that peers are involved in providing feedback in schools in addition to teachers.
Remarks ought to be pertinent and precise. Feedback givers should reply as soon as they can after offering comprehensive and
relevant comments. Furthermore, pupils are exposed to undesirable feedback techniques such as student comparisons and non-
standard, irrelevant comments, claim Alfehaid et al. (2018). Effective use of feedback allows teachers to modify their lesson plans
and student assignments to better suit their needs (Mcfadzien, 2015).
Problem statement
In linear programming, learners frequently struggle to get sufficient feedback, which can impede their progress and
comprehension of the material. According to Gibbs & Simpson (2004), high student-to-teacher ratios or the teachers' limited
availability may prevent students from having individualized feedback from them.
Even though teachers should seldom do, and when they do, the students are not satisfied with what they receive. The main
grievance expressed was that they did not receive sufficient feedback. Similar to this, several students in the Nkeyema District felt
uneasy about the feedback they got in class, which prevented them from learning the necessary skills during their review. This
was brought to the attention of students at student, which provides forums for frequent student meetings to address concerns
pertaining to their study.
In addition, casual discussions with students in the district revealed that they felt the comments they got prevented them from
finishing their coursework. Because the criticism was overly generic, ignored their strong performances, and lost focus on the
issue at hand, it did not aid in their improvement.
Aim
Article's goal was to explore how secondary school pupils view the feedback they get from their teachers.
Research design
This study employed an exploratory, qualitative research approach from an interpretivist standpoint. The primary phenomenon
under investigation was effectively explored and understood with exploratory qualitative approach (Creswell 2014). In order to
comprehend feedback through the interpretation that research participants ascribed to their academic achievement.
Data collection methods
In-depth one-on-one interviews were the method of data collection employed in this investigation. This was created by
conducting in-person, one-on-one interviews with participants to get their opinions on feedback in educational contexts (Creswell
2014b). A personal contact was made with some of the potential participants. The researcher provided the students with consent
form and participant information sheet in addition to explaining the goal of the study. A follow-up was done to see if the pupils
had agreed.
To find out what they thought of the feedback, including its benefits and drawbacks, questions were also asked. The one-on-one
interviews ended after all topics were discussed and neither the participant nor the researcher had anything further to add. Written
permission to record audio and transcribe was secured prior to the start of each interview. Rather than focusing solely on the
researcher's notes, this made verbatim transcriptions possible, which is a crucial part of data processing.
Data analysis
A thematic analysis was conducted on the study's data. The investigator reviewed the transcriptions to look for any gaps. The data
that was gathered was analysed using qualitative content analysis (Maree, 2016). Following the categorization of codes, themes
were produced by combining related categories. "Open coding" refers to the kind of coding that is employed during data
processing. The researchers used open coding to thoroughly analyze the data for trends and variations (Maree 2016). The study's
emerging themes were taken into consideration. After debriefing, the researcher came to a consensus over the emergent themes.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 118
Theoretical Framework
The research utilized the techniques developed by Whitter more & associates. IDAS is a methodology for integrated data analysis
and synthesis that is mostly used in qualitative research when integrating qualitative data from multiple studies. It uses a variety
of methods and approaches to extract complex, in-depth data sets. The main prerequisites are integrity, criticality, authenticity,
and trustworthiness.
These characteristics are essential for every qualitative study. Credibility establishes constant observation and data gathering till
saturation and addresses how closely the results reflect reality (Maree 2016).
All interviews were verbatim transcribed, and the report was written such that readers would comprehend how students felt about
comments in learning situations. In order to ensure criticality, the research process was examined, input from clinical settings was
evaluated, and critical thinking was deeply applied when making study-related decisions. Integrity, in the words of Shaw &
Satalkar (2018), is being open, truthful, and impartial. In general, it discussed how crucial it is to remain true to the study topic
and steer clear of prejudice while interpreting the findings.
Ethical considerations
Ethics, according to Mhiliwa (2015), is the set of customs that researchers follow as fundamental values. As a result,
consideration was given to ethical concerns that affect all participants, including the researcher. Additionally, prior consent was
sought in writing and verbally. All of the participants were also given pseudonyms, and the researcher gave them the assurance
that the information collected would be handled with the utmost confidentiality and anonymity and would only be utilized for
academic research. Every item that was utilized in the data generation process was stored securely. All participants' identities
were concealed and this information was provided to them beforehand to protect their identity and confidentiality as well as those
of the study sites. Therefore, a contract was created with participants in this regard because the researcher's compliance with
confidentiality and respect is paramount (Winner & Dominick, 1994).
III. Findings and Discussions
Students understood feedback they got in learning environments, its ramifications, and ways to make it better. Students believed
that feedback is an integral element of the educational environments. They also believed that feedback in educational contexts has
ramifications. The study involved eleven participants. Of the eleven students, seven were girls and four were boys.
The participants stated that getting feedback helps to enhance instruction and learning. Another way that feedback is viewed is as
a teaching tool.
Students’ perception on feedback
The significance of feedback lies in its direct influence on students' academic performance and learning. Generally, students value
feedback that is timely, clear, constructive, and actionable. Students prefer feedback that is delivered promptly, as it allows them
to understand their mistakes and correct them before they become ingrained habits. Timely feedback is relevant and useful.
Students valued feedback that was provided promptly, enabling them to make timely corrections and improvements (Orsmond &
Merry, 2011). Clear and specific feedback helps students understand exactly what they need to improve. Feedback that is
effective must be precise and unambiguous because students may find it difficult to understand vague remarks (Hattie &
Timperley, 2007). Feedback should be constructive and focused on improvement rather than merely highlighting errors. Positive
feedback can also motivate students. Constructive feedback that highlights strengths and areas for improvement helps students to
enhance their performance" (Gibbs & Simpson, 2004).
Feedback should provide specific suggestions on how students can improve their work. Students appreciate feedback that guides
them on what steps to take next. Giving pupils constructive criticism makes learning easier and helps them develop more (Shute,
2008). Students are more likely to engage with feedback if they perceive it as fair and relevant to their learning goals. According
to Carless, (2006) students are more engaged with learning goals when feedback is fair and aligned. Students prefer formative
feedback over summative feedback, which only assesses their performance. Formative feedback is essential for guiding students
through their learning journey and fostering a growth mind-set.
While teacher feedback is highly valued, students also find peer feedback beneficial, as it provides diverse perspectives and
fosters collaborative learning. Peer feedback is an invaluable addition to teacher feedback since it fosters creative thinking and
provides additional viewpoints. Feedback can have a significant emotional impact on students. Constructive and supportive
feedback can boost confidence, while overly critical feedback can be discouraging. Feedback affects students' motivation and
self-esteem (Rowe, 2011). Students appreciate constructive criticism into the learning process.
Student 1 said that,
I view feedback as a teaching and learning process that takes place in educational environments to direct and assist me in
identifying my mistakes and making the necessary improvements” (S1, 12.06.2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 119
Shute's (2008) claim that feedbacks need to be precise, unambiguous, and closely tied. Students benefit from knowing exactly
what has to be fixed and why. Students can pinpoint their areas of weakness or potential for improvement with the help of
feedback. The learning process begins with this identification since it makes clear what has to be fixed. Feedback that is effective
is targeted at specific areas of the student's work and allows them to pinpoint their mistakes.
After errors are found, feedback offers direction on how to get better. This can be methods, tools, or actions and abilities.
Effective feedback points out mistakes but also makes helpful recommendations for advancement. This direction may come in the
shape of indications, clues, or explicit commands. Furthermore, a study carried out in the UK found that students believed
feedback continuously aided performance improvement (Deeley et al. 2019). Feedback help students recognize their errors and
make the required corrections, resulting in a more productive and interesting learning environment.
Student 2 said that:
Responses to my questions increase my learning and help me acquire the knowledge and abilities I need to pass examinations
(S2, 11.06, 2024).
Clear expectations, feedback enable students to connect their efforts with the learning objectives. Good feedback identifies the
areas in which students need to improve and recognizes their strengths. Acknowledging one's strengths might motivate students to
stick with productive habits. Students must identify their areas of weakness in order to focus their attention on when preparing for
exams (Shute, 2008).
Students evaluate if their information is accurate, up to the necessary levels of performance in their skills through the feedback
process. Education conforms to standards for several processes. As a result, these protocols operate as a manual for regular tasks
and ensure that procedures are followed when students are learning new material.
Student 8 mentioned that:
My knowledge and abilities in the field of education are enhanced by feedback, particularly with regard to errors and providing
accurate answers in general. It assists you in correcting errors (S 8, 11.06.2024).
An emphasis on effort and progress in feedback encourages a growth mind-set. A growth mind-set helps learners persevere
through failures and learn from them, which improves learning outcomes and test scores.
Student mistakes and misunderstandings can be recognized and corrected through feedback. By giving specific comments on
mistakes made when constructing restrictions or goal functions, educators can help students comprehend the fundamentals of
linear programming and avoid making the same mistakes. To put it mildly, receiving feedback can aid students in learning more
efficiently and provide information necessary to ace their exams.
Students 3 stated that:
Some teachers let you share your thoughts about the material you have studied. At times, they request your opinions, after which
you collaborate to find a solution (S3 10.06.2024)
According to Goetz et al. (2018), students view feedback as a teaching strategy used in classrooms. This suggests that teachers
take use of the chance to instruct during feedback time by demonstrating rapid tactical abilities or instructing pupils the right
procedures to follow.
Student 9 reflected:
“For instance, if I answer a question incorrectly, the teacher would demonstrate the optimal approach and expertise during the
feedback session and show me how to answer the question correctly” (S9, 10.06.2024).
Student-teacher interactions and feedback are interrelated. Students' responses to criticism are also influenced by their
perceptions. A teacher can exhibit the best strategy and level of knowledge during a feedback session by employing a methodical
and thorough approach (Guskey, 2018). It describes each step's reasoning and underlines the parts needed to provide a functional
illustration of a solution for the problem. Use analogies or relevant examples to clarify concepts. This facilitates understanding of
more difficult concepts. Showcase a range of acceptable techniques, provide instances of multiple approaches to the topic, and go
over the benefits and drawbacks of each (Smith, 2020).
Additionally, it was felt that there were problems with communication and that the feedback was inconsistent. The participants
reported that following processes in educational environments, they were given favorable feedback. Furthermore, the participants
reported that the teachers provide them with insightful, thorough, critical, and helpful feedback regarding how they perform was
taken to be encouraging comments.
The implication of feedback
In many disciplines, including psychology, business, and education, and communication, feedback is essential. When feedback is
applied well, it can have a large beneficial impact and lead to improvements.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 120
1. Enhanced Learning and Performance
Receiving feedback is crucial to learning and enhancing performance. It gives people insight into their existing performance level
and offers guidance. Feedback should be clear, powerful influences on students' development, meaningful, purposeful, and
congruent with their prior knowledge.
2. Increased Motivation and Engagement
Clear and achievable goals are a key component of effective feedback, which raises motivation and engagement levels. Positive
and constructive criticism can increase self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation, which increases task engagement. The Self-
Determination Theory by Deci and Ryan (2000) emphasizes the value of feedback in fostering competence and autonomy, two
essential elements of motivation.
3. Behavioural Change and Development
It's critical to provide feedback. It helps people find opportunities for growth and encourages behavioural modification. Kluger
and DeNisi (1996) found that feedback interventions can effectively improve performance, even if their efficacy depends on how
the feedback is delivered and received.
Receiving feedback encourages responsibility and work ownership. People learn more about their obligations and the
consequences of their acts when they receive criticism.
Sufficient feedback systems improve individual performance and promote a culture of ongoing learning and development.
Student 10 said:
As corrections are made, I get encouraged and cultivate a good mind-set. Corrections, criticisms, and insightful information
about what might have been done incorrectly or omitted are provided so that mistakes are not made again. I should also mention
that we truly receive insightful and thorough feedback (S10, 11.06.2024).
Instead of focusing only on the procedural aspects of learning psychology, constructive feedback helps students consider how
they think and grasp the fundamental ideas. To solve complicated Linear Programming problems, a deeper comprehension is
essential (Nicol, & Macfarlane-Dick, 2006). When feedback is delivered to groups of students, the feedback givers call on
everyone to congregate in one location before providing information.
Student 5 said that:
My ability to correctly recognize vital signs was aided by feedback. Since I was unsure, the response was very helpful because I
found the difficult concepts to be simple” (S 5, 11.06.2024).
When they get feedback, students are urged to take protocol into consideration. Through critical examination, students acquire
knowledge. Thinking introspectively like this promotes mental processes. Effective feedback boosts pupils' self-esteem and
motivation, two essential elements of effective learning. Students perform better on exams when they are self-assured, genuinely
connect with the subject matter, and overcome hurdles. For example, they can pinpoint the kinds of problems they find difficult
and tailor their practice accordingly (Butler & Winne, 1995). Furthermore, feedback was only acknowledged as knowledge that
teachers gave to students regarding their work. Learners felt that there were similarities in the type and style of feedback that they
received.
Participants noted that one prevalent practice in educational settings is for the feedback provider to control procession.
Participants reported feeling uninvited to participate and fearing that the feedback giver might not assist them in the future if they
questioned or shared their personal ideas.
This was expressed by Student 4:
Once they've watched you carry out a procedure, they tell you how you did and solicit your opinion. Occasionally, you want to
ask questions but are unable to do so because you're not allowed to comment (S4, 11.06.2024).
According to Carless (2019) feedback should assist students perform better or develop better learning strategies. Future
performance development necessitates the creation of an action plan outlining the necessary modifications, which calls for
follow-up work. Giving feedback involves a series of cyclical acts rather than being a one-time event. This is due to their
perception that after feedback is provided, there is never any follow-up to find out what has changed. It also became evident that
feedback was sent through nonverbal cues that showed performance had matched expectations.
Student 2 observed that:
They rarely use words to express how well you're doing; instead, it sometimes shows up as trust. If they see that you can carry
out a task without help, they will always assign it to you (S2, 11.06.2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 121
According to Carless (2019), motivated, proactive students who have a strong desire to learn are usually the ones who show
feedback-seeking behaviors. Students only stated that they would receive feedback from their teachers, despite evidence
demonstrating that students in learning contexts receive input (Houghton, 2016). Since peer teaching, evaluation, and observation
are not used in schools, peer feedback might not be given. When the assessment form is given to the students for delivery and
review, they can open it and look it over. Participants recognized the learning environments in a classroom even when they were
directed towards them.
Student 1 Indicated that:
We assess our response strategies when the topic is revised, and the teacher provides us with performance evaluations and
advice on how to respond effectively (S1, 11.06.2024.)
Evaluation and feedback do, in fact, overlap. Moreover, evaluation produces cumulative performance reports, while feedback
may serve as aid.
Participants said that within their secondary school context, they alternated between various settings. They observed variations in
the form and style of feedback provided in educational environments, and individual feedback providers also noted these
variations. The participants also thought that the dearth of uniformity was due to the absence of guidelines or standards to follow
when providing comments. It seems that feedback providers provided input without adhering to any set protocol on the
frequency, time, or procedures of providing feedback. Rather, the criticism was grounded in their own values.
A student 7 expressed that:
Teachers seem to be more rigorous during revision and provide more in-depth comments since they want us to avoid making the
same mistakes on the test. Since everyone provides feedback in a different way, they provide us with guidelines to follow (S7,
11.06.2024).
According to Mandane et al. (2015), feedback includes sharing information and receiving comments on that sharing. Feedback
was thought to have relational implications in educational situations since it is performance-based and entails communication
between the giver and the recipient. According to participant reports, self-evaluation and self-development are linked to feedback.
Feedback was seen to support students' self-reflection and further enhance traits including self-assurance.
Student 10 said that:
I can think more clearly about my mistakes and how to avoid making the same ones when I get feedback. Because it boosts
students' self-esteem, self-motivation, confidence, and sense of personal fulfilment, feedback is crucial (S 10, 11.06.2024).
Consequently, Mcfadzien (2015) contends that students ought to accept and have faith in the providers. While feedback is helpful
for learning, students must utilize it carefully. Nevertheless, the results demonstrated the important function that feedback plays
since it gives students' abilities by allowing them to make corrections when necessary. Feedback-seeking behavior was also
identified as an authentication mechanism by the study's findings. Via a two-way conversation feedback motivates students.
According to participants, students go to their peers for criticism when they don't receive it from teachers in an educational
environment.
Student 11 acknowledged that:
We are kept occupied by feedback since it allows us to discuss performance improvement and pose queries. But not all
educators see it that way; some tell you they're taking a break (S11. 11, 06.2024).
Students receive specific, helpful criticism, important feedback in and positive feedback that is apparent in favorable comments.
These results refute early issues noted, specifically too general feedback given to students. Furthermore, consistent with those of
Dawson et al. (2019), who found that comments provided on students' work were encouraging, constructive, supporting, and
favorable. This is in contrast to Carless (2019), who found that student responses were task-specific, constrained, and dismissive.
In educational settings, having strong interpersonal skills among students and between them and peers/mentors is crucial since it
promotes learning. The participants stated that in learning environments, feedback promoted the growth of close relationships
between them and their teachers
Participants Students 3 said that:
I was able to talk to my teacher and ask for help because we had a strong relationship. Feedback helps teachers and students
have positive working relationships. (S3, 11.06.2024).
Positive reinforcement of effectively implemented techniques and solutions strengthens successful tactics and increases self-
assurance. Students remember these techniques when they are validated for correctly utilizing the simplex method steps or
graphical solutions (Shute, 2008). Both students who receive it and instructors or other educators who provide it find it to be
equally important (Mcfadzien 2015). It thereby improves their teaching strategies (AITSL, 2024). In order to optimize student
learning, educators are urged to use feedback mechanisms.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 122
The way students responded suggested that the feedback elicited emotional responses. Some feedback providers exploited the
opportunity throughout the feedback process, which resulted in harsh feedback that the participants experienced. This was another
emotional reaction.
Student 8 mentioned that:
Even though some teachers are really impolite, we can't argue with them. Sometimes pupils need to maintain their composure
(S8, 11, 06.2024).
Participants offered recommendations about how to better feedback during the interviews. The recommendations advocated for a
cooperative strategy that included feedback providers, district management, and educational institutions. The two components
that make up this theme are rules and techniques for providing feedback, and instruction for student coordination.
Students 2 suggested that:
I am suggesting that teacher should follow up on students to see if they’re improving based on their feedback or they can
delegate another person to follow up (S2, 11.06.2024).
Subsequent Activity eliminates any confusion, as this is essential to repairing errors and misconceptions (Shute, 2008). It
facilitates students' deeper engagement with their work, understanding of their errors, and gradual performance improvement.
Effective feedback, according to Nicol & Macfarlane-Dick (2006), aids the learner's capacity for self-regulation.
This activity provides students with reinforcement and helps them through application and repetition. Students that have good
follow-up edit their work based on feedback they receive through repetition and application; this exercise reinforces their learning
while also assisting students in making corrections (Sadler, 1989). It is suffice to mention that, feedback follow-up is essential
since it clears up misunderstandings, encourages introspection, boosts confidence, offers practice chances, and reaffirms learning
goals.
Student 4 supports this view:
We can't hold them accountable for the input they occasionally provide us because it's possible that they weren't instructed or
taught in this area. They are excellent teachers, but they don't appear to know their students. I'm asking subject matter experts to
draft standard operating procedures that should be adhered to (S4, 11.06.2024)
The study's participants hinted that they receive comments in an unfavorable manner. This encompasses impolite behaviors paired
with hurtful and disparaging remarks. Furthermore, one positive interpretation of the students' behavior is that, in spite of
receiving unfavorable criticism, they maintained composure and approached the issue with optimism. When a student receives
feedback in an encouraging manner, they will interpret it well and experience happiness. Students who interpret comments as
criticism will react with denial, rage, and finger-pointing. It is urged that feedback providers refrain from providing distress in
order to avoid these kinds of reactions (Qureshi, 2017).
Student 5 mentioned that:
I could get comments from friends, who could articulate things clearly, in addition to my teacher. It was also really helpful to
me in my academics” (S5, 11.06.2024).
Teacher feedback can offer techniques to tackling linear programming problems in collaborative learning contexts. Better
performance and a deeper knowledge may result from this (Gielen, et al., 2010). Peer feedback for learning" shows how
structured peer feedback can enhance learning outcomes by offering a variety of viewpoints and chances for cooperative problem-
solving. As a result, less time is spent with the kids and more emphasis is placed on performance. According to Hardavella et al.
(2017), group feedback was interpreted by students as a critique that could damage relationships, hence feedback be personalized
and offered to specific individuals. Furthermore, feedback from groups undermines students' feelings.
Enhancing feedback, particularly in educational and professional settings, can significantly improve learning and performance.
Incorporating credibility, provide additional context, and facilitate deeper understanding. Encourage self-assessment and
reflection by referencing reflective practices or questions. Collaboration and peer review Promote peer evaluations and offer
instructions on how to do so successfully.
Assist with continuous feedback and references to monitor development over time. Cite prior feedback and demonstrate the
enhancements that have been implemented. Provide sources for ongoing education, such as periodicals, trade shows, or
associations for professionals. A solid introduction gives a comprehensive summary of the subject, especially when addressing
the applicability of Smith's 2020 study on consumer behavior. However, using a mixed-methods approach could improve the
methodology section.
It is adequate to say that feedback plays a significant role in determining how well pupils learn and perform during learning
processes. Student growth and the closing of the achievement disconnect among desired and actual results can both be facilitated
by feedback. In addition, protocols and rules for providing feedback ought to facilitate both the coordination of tasks and
comprehending the idea. This offers a perceptive and beneficial response.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 123
IV. Recommendations
The study's conclusions led to the following recommendations being made:
1. Rather than just giving general observations, teachers should ensure that their feedback is targeted, focused on the
student's achievement in those areas, and detailed. It is the goal of educators to give prompt, constructive, and actionable
feedback. This entails pointing out the student's methods for addressing linear programming issues, both in their strong
points and their areas for development.
2. Teachers should offer feedback as quickly as practical. Prompt feedback aids in strengthening the retention rate. Instead
of waiting weeks to provide feedback, they ought to do so immediately following a task or evaluation (Shute, 2008).
3. Encouragement, compliments, and ideas for development are given to pupils to keep them motivated and from being
overtaken by criticism. Prior to addressing areas that require work, they must to begin with anything the learner
performed well.
4. Motivate students to consider the input they are given. This promotes independent learning and helps them develop their
capacity for critical thought. Guided reflection exercises or follow-up assignments that require students to apply the
remarks can be helpful in this regard. Students should be asked to list the benefits and drawbacks of their work before
receiving an evaluation (Andrade & Valtcheva, 2009).
5. The feedback ought to be process-oriented. The instructor should place more emphasis on the effort and learning process
than just the outcome or grades. This promotes a growth-oriented mind-set. Placing more emphasis on the work and
advancements accomplished than just the final grade (Dweck, 2006).
V. Conclusion
Effective feedback application includes being detailed, timely, balanced, promoting self-evaluation, employing a variety of
techniques, keeping the learning process front and center, and offering on-going support. Best practices and educational research
that highlight learning and fostering student development back up these tactics. By implementing these recommendations,
teachers can foster and facilitate students’ perspectives and continuous growth. Effective feedback mechanisms improve student
performance in linear programming courses by fixing errors, reiterating proper techniques, fostering deeper knowledge,
promoting self-regulation, increasing motivation, and facilitating collaborative learning.
Since feedback reduces the performance gap between intended and actual fundamental components of teaching procedures used
in educational contexts. Additionally, feedback on linear programming should be given to students. The opinions of feedback
providers are appropriately utilized in educational settings.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Mr Kabubi Gregory, the head teacher, for allowing him to collect information from students.
References
1. AITSL, (2024). Reframing feedback to improve teaching and learning, viewed 07 June 2024, from
https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/research evidence/spotlight/spotlight-feedback. pdf?s fvrsn=cb2eec3c_12.
2. Al-Bashir, M., Kabir, R. & Rahman, I., (2016). ‘The value and effectiveness of feedback in improving students’ learning
and professionalizing teaching in higher education’, Journal of Education and Practice 7(16), 38–41.
3. Alfehaid, L.S., Qotineh, A., Alsuhebany, N., Alharbi, S. & Almodaimegh, H., (2018). ‘The perceptions and attitudes of
undergraduate healthcare sciences students of feedback: A qualitative study’, Health Professions Education 4(3), 186
197. 10.1016/j.hpe.2018.03.002
4. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into
Practice, 48(1), 12-19.
5. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &
Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
6. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4),
447-468.
7. Burgess, A. & Mellis, C., (2015), ‘Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: achieving the right balance’,
Advances in Medical Education and Practice 19(6), 373381. 10.2147/AMEP.S77890 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Carless, D. & Boud, D., (2018), The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback’,
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8), 13151325. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
9. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.
10. Carless, D., (2019). ‘Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals’, Assessment and Evaluation in
Higher Education 44(5), 705714. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
11. Carless, D., and Boud, D. (2018). The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.
Assess. Eval. Higher Education 43 (8), 13151325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
12. Creswell, J., (2014), Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research,
Pearson, London.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 124
13. Creswell, J., (2014b). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
14. Dasila, K., Veer, B., Ponchitra, R., Divya, K.Y. & Singh, S., (2016). ‘Perceptions of nursing students on clinical
teaching behaviors of teaching faculty: Correlational survey design’, IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science 5(5,
version 6), 3741.
15. Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Mahoney, P., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D. et al.., (2019). ‘What makes for effective
feedback: Staff and student perspectives’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44(1), 2536.
10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
16. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination
of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
17. Deeley, S.J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D. & Koristashevskaya, E., (2019), ‘Exploring the “wicked” problem
of student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback in higher education’, Higher Education Pedagogie 4(1), 385
405. 10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659
18. Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.
19. Dobrowolska, B., Mcgonagle, I., Jackson, C., Kane, R., Cabrera, E., Cooney-Miner, D. et al.., (2015), ‘Clinical practice
models in nursing education: Implication for students’ mobility’, International Nursing Review 62(1), 36–46.
10.1111/inr.12162 [PubMed]
20. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mind-set: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
21. Fowler, P. & Wilford, B., (2016), ‘Formative feedback in the clinical practice setting: What are the perceptions of
student radiographers?’, Radiography 22(1), e16–e24. 10.1016/j.radi.2015.03.005
22. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and
Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3-31.
23. Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., Krannich, M., and Gogol, K. (2018). “Performance Feedback and Emotions,” in The
Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. Editors A. A. Lipnevich, and J. K. Smith (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press).
24. González-García, M., Lana, A., Zurrón-Madera, P., Valrcel-álvarez, Y. & Fernández-Feito, A., (2020), ‘Nursing
students’ experiences of clinical practices in emergency and intensive care unit’, International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health 17(16), 114. 10.3390/ijerph17165686 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Guskey, T. R. (2018). “Feedback, Correctives, and the Use of Pre-assessments,” in The Cambridge Handbook of
Instructional Feedback. Cambridge University Press, 432450.
26. Hardavella, G., Aamli-Gaagnat, A., Saad, N., Rousalova, I. & Sreter, K.B., (2017), ‘How to give and receive feedback
effectively’, Breathe 13(4), 327–333. 10.1183/20734735.009917
27. Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., and Harnett, J. A. (2015). Analysis of New Zealand Primary and Secondary Student Peer-
and Self-Assessment Comments: Applying Hattie and Timperley's Feedback Model. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract.
22 (2), 265281. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.976541
28. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
29. Heitink, M., Van der Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B., Schildkamp, K. & Kippers, W., (2016), ‘A systematic review of
prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice’, Educational Research Review 17, 5062.
10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002 Houghton, T., (2016), ‘Assessment and accountability: Part 1 Assessment’, Nursing
Standard 30(38), 4149. 10.7748/ns.30.38.41. s 44 [PubMed]
30. Kalyani, M.N., Jamshidi, N., Molazem, Z., Torabizadeh, C. & Sharif, F., (2019), ‘How do nursing students experience
the clinical learning environment and respond to their experiences? A qualitative study’, BMJ Open 9(7), 18.
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028052
31. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a
Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
32. London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback Orientation, Feedback Culture, and the Longitudinal Performance
Management Process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81-100.
33. Maree, K., (2016). First steps in research, Van Schaick, Pretoria.
34. Mcfadzien, N., (2015). ‘Why is effective feedback so critical in teaching and learning?’, Journal of Initial Teacher
Inquiry 1, 1618. 10.26021/844
35. Mhiliwa, J. A. (2015). The effectiveness of school location on learner’s academic performance: A case of community
secondary schools in Makambako town council, Njombe, MA Dissertation: Open University of Tanzania
36. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven
Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
37. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review
perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102-122.
38. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2011). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’
understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 125-136.
39. Pedram, K., Brooks, M.N., Marcelo, C., Kurbanova, N., Paletta-Hobbs, L., Garber, A.M. et al.., (2020). ‘Peer
observations: Enhancing bedside clinical teaching behaviors’, Cureus 12(2), 1–10. 10.7759/cureus.7076 [PMC free
article] [PubMed]
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIII, Issue VIII, August 2024
www.ijltemas.in Page 125
40. Pront, L. & McNeill, L., (2019). ‘Nursing students’ perceptions of a clinical learning assessment activity: “Linking the
puzzle pieces of theory to practice”’, Nurse Education in Practice 36, 8590. 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.03.008 [PubMed]
41. Qureshi, N.S., (2017). ‘Giving effective feedback in medical education’, The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 19(3), 243–
248. 10.1111/tog.12391
42. Rajeswaran, L., (2017). ‘Clinical experiences of nursing students at a selected institute of health sciences in Botswana’,
Health Science Journal 10(6), 16. 10.21767/1791-809x.1000471
43. Rowe, A. D. (2011). The personal dimension in teaching: Why students value feedback. International Journal of
Educational Management, 25(4), 343-360.
44. Shaw, D. & Satalkar, P., (2018). ‘Researchers’ interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study’, Accountability
in Research 25(2), 7993.10.1080/08989621.2017.1413940
45. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
46. Whittemore, R., Chase, S. K., & Mandle, C. L. (2001). Validity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research,
11(4), 522-537. doi:10.1177/104973201129119299.
47. Wimmer, B. & Dominick, C. (1994). Ethical Issues in Research. London: Sage