Transesterification of Castor Oil for Biodiesel Production Using H2SO4 Wet Impregnated Snail, Egg and Crab Shell Catalyst.

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Nwanekwu Akunna Maureen
Omuku Patrick Enuneku
Okoye Patrice-Anthony Chudi
Vincent Ishmael Egbulefu Ajiwe
Omuku Patrick Enuneku
Onyeije Ugomma Chibuzor

Biodiesel does not only provide a sustainable alternative for diesel fuel but also enables the transformation and utilization of wastes into high value products. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use heterogeneous catalysts derived from wet-impregnated snail, crab and egg shell waste in the production of biodiesel using castor oil. The use of castor oil as the preferred non-edible oil is due its high ricinoleic acid concentration as well as its high solubility in alcohol. The uncalcined egg, snail and crab shell catalysts were identified as E, S and C respectively while CS800oC/H2SO4, CC900 oC/H2SO4, and CE900 oC/H2SO4 represents calcined/impregnated snail, crab and egg shell catalysts respectively. The BET and SEM were used to determine the surface morphology and microstructure of the catalysts while the structure of the crystalline materials and the elemental composition of the catalysts were determined using the XRD and XRF respectively. GC-MS was used to analyze the free fatty acid composition of the oil and FTIR to obtain the organic and polymeric materials present. The physical and chemical analysis of the crude castor oil was carried out so as to determine the percentage of FFA contained in the oil. Each of the calcined/impregnated snail, crab and egg shells were reacted singly with castor oil in the biodiesel production where CS, CC and CE are acronyms that stands for castor oil-snail shell, castor oil-crab shell and castor oil-egg shell biodiesel products respectively. All three castor oil biodiesel products were produced at various specifications or reaction conditions lettered from A – I usually written as a subscript after the biodiesel product and as a result, 27 samples of biodiesel was produced. The optimal conditions required for the production of the biodiesel were obtained and the fuel properties of all 27 samples of biodiesel produced were determined. The crude castor oil gave acid value and FFA of 5.87mgKOH/g and 3.25 respectively which were above the ASTM standards at 0.4 – 4 mgKOH/g and 0.2 – 2 respectively. The highest surface area was produced from calcined/impregnated crab shell at 170.21 m 2/g. The result from the FTIR analysis showed the presence of O – C – O and O – H bonds in the uncalcined spectra and a strong S ═ O bond after calcination/impregnation. Castor oil-egg shell biodiesel product obtained with H-specification (CEH) produced the highest biodiesel yield of 95.3 %. This was obtained at optimal conditions of 1:12 oil to methanol ratio, 5 wt% catalyst loading, 60 OC reaction temperature for 60 min reaction time. Results from the characterization of biodiesel products obtained showed 70, 9.80 mm2/s and 945 kg/m3 as maximum values of cetane number, kinematic viscosity and density traced from castor oil-egg shell biodiesel product obtained with H-specification (CEH), castor oil-snail shell biodiesel product obtained with A-specification (CSA) and castor oil-egg shell biodiesel products obtained with A-specification (CEA) respectively.

Transesterification of Castor Oil for Biodiesel Production Using H2SO4 Wet Impregnated Snail, Egg and Crab Shell Catalyst. (2024). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 13(5), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130520

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tsegay B. (2019). Production of Biodiesel from Castor Seed Oil via Transesterification with Methanol-Ethanol Blends Using Calcium Oxide as Catalyst. Chemical and Bioengineering of Addis Ababa Institute of Technology. Chemical and Bio Engineering.

Kartika A., Yani M., Ariono D., Evon P., Rigal L. (2013). Biodiesel Production from Jatropha Seeds: Solvent Extraction and In Situ Transesterification in a Single Step. Fuel, 106, 111–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.021

Coronado C.R., Carvalho J.A.D., Silveira J.L. (2009). Biodiesel CO2 Emissions: A Comparison with the Main Fuels in the Brazilian Market. Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 204-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.09.006

Singh V., Yadav M., Sharma Y.C. (2017). Effect of Co-Solvent on Biodiesel Production Using Calcium Aluminium Oxide as a Reusable Catalyst and Waste Vegetable Oil. Fuel, 203, 360-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.111

Abdulkareem A.S., Uthman H., Afolabi A.S., Awonebe O.L. (2011). Extraction and Optimization of Oil From Moringa Oleifera Seed as an Alternative Feedstock for the Production of Biodiesel. In: Majid N., Mostafa K., editors. Sustainable Growth and Application in Renewable Energy Sources. InTech. pp. 243-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/25855

Sharma S.K., Singh A.P. (2011). Pharmacognostical Evaluation of Roots of Simmondsia chinensis Schneider. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, 3(4), 323–326.

Chakraborty R., Bepari S., Banerjee A. (2011). Application of Calcined Waste Fish (Labeo rohita) Scale as Low-Cost Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis. Bioresource Technology, 102, 3610-3618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.123

Helwani Z., Othman M.R., Aziz N., Kim J., Fernando W.J.N. (2009). Solid Heterogeneous Catalysts in Transesterification of Triglycerides with Methanol: A Review. Applied Catalysis A: General, 363(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.021

Kiss A.A., Dimian A.C., Rothenberg G. (2008). Biodiesel by Catalytic Reactive Distillation Powered by Metal Oxides. Energy & Fuels, 22, 598-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700265y

Laskar I.B., Rajkumari K., Gupta R., Chatterjee S., Paul B., Rokhum L. (2018). Waste Snail Shell Derived Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Production by the Transesterification of Soybean Oil. RSC Advances. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA02397B

Hajlari S.A., Najafi B., Ardabili S.F. (2019). Castor Oil, a Source for Biodiesel Production and Its Impact on the Diesel Engine Performance. Reinforced Plastics, 28, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2018.09.006

Kolawole S.A., Zakariyaw A.A., Omoniyi A.O. (2020). Preparation and Characterization of Epoxy Filled Snail Shell Thermoset Composite. Direct Research Journal of Chemistry and Material Science, 6, 8–13.

Salimon J., Salih N., Yousif E. (2010). Biolubricants: Raw Materials, Chemical Modifications and Environmental Benefits. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 112(5), 519–530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900205

Hossain A.B.M.S., Mazen M.A. (2010). Effects of Catalyst Types and Concentrations on Biodiesel Production from Waste Soybean Oil Biomass as Renewable Energy and Environmental Recycling Process. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 4(7), 550–555.

Kolawole S.A., Zakariyaw A.A., Omoniyi A.O. (2020). Preparation and Characterization of Epoxy Filled Snail Shell Thermoset Composite. Direct Research Journal of Chemistry and Material Science, 6, 8–13.

Nageswara R.L., Hassan S.T. (2018). Utilization of Modified Egg Shells as Solid Catalyst for the Conversion of Waste Cooking Oil to Biodiesel. Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Caledonian College of Engineering.

Hameed B.H., Lai L.F., Chin L.H. (2009). Production of Biodiesel from Palm Oil (Elaeis guineensis) Using Heterogeneous Catalyst: An Optimized Process. Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 606-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.014

Kumar V.S., Navaratnam V. (2013). Neem (Azadirachta indica): Prehistory to Contemporary Medicinal Uses to Humankind. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 3(7), 505-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60105-7

Article Details

How to Cite

Transesterification of Castor Oil for Biodiesel Production Using H2SO4 Wet Impregnated Snail, Egg and Crab Shell Catalyst. (2024). International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science, 13(5), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2024.130520