AI-Driven Model for Contract Law Cases
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract: The subjective nature of human analysis results in inconsistent decision-making, which seriously jeopardizes the accuracy and fairness of the verdicts in contract disputes. Legal practitioners confront the difficult task of organizing and evaluating numerous precedent/statutes case materials promptly as the amount of contracts keeps increasing. This time constraint not only makes it more difficult to resolve contract issues on time but also makes the legal system more complicated and unclear. There has never been a greater need for contract litigation to undergo an extensive change. The researcher proposed two complementary methods for retrieving legal documents: BM25 and an aggregated Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model with a Convolution Neural Network (CNN)
Downloads
Downloads
References
Ahmad, S., Asghar, M. Z., Alotaibi, F. M., & Al‐Otaibi, Y. D. (2022). A hybrid CNN + BILSTM deep learning-based DSS for efficient prediction of judicial case decisions. Expert Systems With Applications, 209, 118318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118318
Branting, L.K.: Reasoning with Rules and Precedents: A Computational Model of Legal Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrect/Boston/London (2000) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2848-5
Gomede, E., PhD. (2023, September 2). Understanding the BM25 ranking Algorithm - Everton Gomede, PhD - medium. Medium. https://medium.com/@evertongomede/understanding-the-bm25-ranking-algorithm-19f6d45c6ce
Governatori, G., Bench-Capon, T., Verheij, B., Araszkiewicz, M., Francesconi, E., & Grabmair, M. (2022). Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 30(4), 481–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-022-09329-4
Hassan, M. U. (2022). Technology Assisted Review of Legal Documents. RIT Scholar Works. https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/11395/
Jelali, S. E., Fersini, E., & Messina, E. (2015). Legal retrieval as support to eMediation: matching disputant’s case and court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-015-9162-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-015-9162-1
Rhanoui, M., Mikram, M., Yousfi, S., & Barzali, S. (2019). A CNN-BILSTM model for Document-Level Sentiment Analysis. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 1(3), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.3390/make1030048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/make1030048
Publications - Dr. B.J.G. (Bas) Testerink - Utrecht University. (2022). https://www.uu.nl/staff/BJGTesterink/Publications
Sampath, K., & Thenmozhi, D. (2022a). PReLCaP : Precedence Retrieval from Legal Documents Using Catch Phrases. Neural Processing Letters/Neural Processing Letters, 54(5), 3873–3891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10791-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-022-10791-z
Thomson Reuters Corporation. (2024, January 25). How AI and machine learning are shaping legal strategy. https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/careers/careers-blog/how-ai
All articles published in our journal are licensed under CC-BY 4.0, which permits authors to retain copyright of their work. This license allows for unrestricted use, sharing, and reproduction of the articles, provided that proper credit is given to the original authors and the source.