Energetic Particles in Space and Earth Science: Propagation, Interaction, and Atmospheric Effects

Energetic particles, originating from galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), solar energetic particles (SEPs), and trapped radiation belt populations, play a crucial role in shaping planetary environments. These high-energy protons, electrons, and heavy ions traverse the heliosphere, interact with interplanetary magnetic fields, and produce complex cascades when colliding with Earth’s atmosphere. This paper combines theoretical modeling, Monte Carlo–inspired GEANT4-like yield tables, and simulation of Bethe–Bloch stopping power to investigate energetic particle propagation, atmospheric ionization, and implications for space weather. Our findings reveal that density-effect corrections and shell corrections significantly alter proton energy loss curves, while GEANT4-like lookup yields realistic ionization profiles vs altitude. These results advance predictive models of radiation hazards, ionospheric variability, and space weather events.

Energetic Particles, GEANT4, Space Weather, Atmospheric Ionization

1. Science Reviews, vol. 217, no. 6, p. 72, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. M. S. Potgieter, “Solar modulation of cosmic rays,” Living Reviews in Solar Physics, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. S. Koldobskiy, F. Mekhaldi, G. Kovaltsov, and I. Usoskin, “Multiproxy reconstructions of integral energy spectra for extreme solar particle events of 7176 BCE, 660 BCE, 775 CE, and 994 CE,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 128, no. 3, p. e2022JA031186, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. T. G. Reames, “Exploring residential rooftop solar potential in the United States by race and ethnicity,” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, vol. 3, p. 666411, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, S. Akiyama, and H. Xie, “Estimation of reconnection flux using post-eruption arcades and its relevance to magnetic clouds at 1 AU,” Solar Physics, vol. 292, no. 4, p. 65, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. G. Zank et al., “Diffusive shock acceleration and reconnection acceleration processes,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 814, no. 2, p. 137, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. E. Amato and P. Blasi, “Cosmic ray transport in the Galaxy: A review,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2731–2749, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. M. Aguilar et al., “Precision measurement of the helium flux in primary cosmic rays of rigidities 1.9 GV to 3 TV with the alpha magnetic spectrometer on the international space station,” Physical review letters, vol. 115, no. 21, p. 211101, 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. E. Amato and P. Blasi, “Cosmic ray transport in the Galaxy: A review,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2731–2749, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. M. Desai and J. Giacalone, “Large gradual solar energetic particle events,” Living Reviews in Solar Physics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 3, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. E. Parker, “Interaction of the solar wind with the geomagnetic field,” The Physics of Fluids, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 171–187, 1958. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. G. P. Zank, L. Adhikari, L.-L. Zhao, P. Mostafavi, E. Zirnstein, and D. J. McComas, “The pickup ion-mediated solar wind,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 869, no. 1, p. 23, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. J. R. Jokipii, “Cosmic-ray propagation. I. Charged particles in a random magnetic field,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 146, p. 480, vol. 146, p. 480, 1966. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. R. D. T. Strauss and F. Effenberger, “A Hitch-hiker’s Guide to stochastic differential equations: solution methods for energetic particle transport in space physics and astrophysics,” Space Science Reviews, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 151–192, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. A. Bruno et al., “Solar energetic particle events observed by the PAMELA mission,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 862, no. 2, p. 97, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. M. Wiedenbeck et al., “3He-rich solar energetic particle observations at the Parker Solar Probe and near Earth,” The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 246, no. 2, p. 42, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. M. Shea and D. Smart, “Space weather and the ground-level solar proton events of the 23rd solar cycle,” Space science reviews, vol. 171, no. 1, pp. 161–188, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. J. S. Rankin et al., “Anomalous cosmic-ray oxygen observations into 0.1 au,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 925, no. 1, p. 9, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Y. Y. Shprits et al., “Unusual stable trapping of the ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts,” Nature Physics, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 699–703, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. J. S. Rankin et al., “Anomalous cosmic-ray oxygen observations into 0.1 au,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 925, no. 1, p. 9, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. G. Bazilevskaya, “On the early phase of relativistic solar particle events: Are there signatures of acceleration mechanism?,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 530–536, 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. L. I. Dorman, “Cosmic rays as an object of research,” in Cosmic Rays in the Earth’s Atmosphere and Underground, Springer, 2004, pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. K. Herbst et al., “Impact of cosmic rays on atmospheric ion chemistry and spectral transmission features of TRAPPIST-1e,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 961, no. 2, p. 164, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. I. G. Usoskin et al., “Revisited reference solar proton event of 23 February 1956: Assessment of the cosmogenic‐isotope method sensitivity to extreme solar events,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 125, no. 6, p. e2020JA027921, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. M. Tulej et al., “Experimental investigation of the radiation shielding efficiency of a MCP detector in the radiation environment near Jupiter’s moon Europa,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 383, pp. 21–37, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Z. Khattari and M. Al-Buriahi, “Monte Carlo simulations and Phy-X/PSD study of radiation shielding effectiveness and elastic properties of barium zinc aluminoborosilicate glasses,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 195, p. 110091, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. C. Cohen et al., “PSP/IS⊙ IS observations of the 29 November 2020 solar energetic particle event,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 656, p. A29, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. E. Asvestari, A. Gil, G. A. Kovaltsov, and I. G. Usoskin, “Neutron monitors and cosmogenic isotopes as cosmic ray energy‐integration detectors: Effective yield functions, effective energy, and its dependence on the local interstellar spectrum,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 9790–9802, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. I. G. Usoskin et al., “Solar cyclic activity over the last millennium reconstructed from annual 14C data,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 649, p. A141, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. N. Gopalswamy, S. Akiyama, S. Yashiro, and H. Xie, “Coronal flux ropes and their interplanetary counterparts,” Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 180, pp. 35–45, 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. W. Kathryn et al., “Review of solar energetic particle models”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. M. Laurenza et al., “COURSE: Cross-scale cOUpling pRocesses in the Solar–tErrestrial system—SCOSTEP’s new program for 2026–2030,” Earth, Planets and Space, vol. 77, no. 1, p. 180, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]