Environmental Quality and Sectoral Output in Nigeria: Long-Run Elasticity Evidence from Fully Modified and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares Estimation
Authors
Department of Economics, Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo, Oyo State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Economics, Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo, Oyo State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800013
Subject Category: Economy
Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 199-216
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-15
Accepted: 2026-08-20
Published: 2026-09-03
Abstract
This study examines the long-run elasticity effects of environmental quality on agricultural and industrial output in Nigeria for the period 1981-2024, filling a gap in the literature of environmental quality as an outcome of sectors' activity rather than determinant. Eight cointegrated long-run equations are estimated for per capita CO2 emissions and ecological footprint as environmental quality proxies, precipitation and temperature as climate controls, and primarily using Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS), with Dynamic OLS (DOLS) for robustness. Results show sector specific sensitivity: CO2 emissions have a positive and significant long-run impact on agriculture (elasticity close to +0.335), possibly due to ‘carbon fertilisation effects' on Nigeria's predominant C3 crops. In contrast, none of the environmental quality variables is significant for the models of industrial output under FMOLS. Urbanisation has consistent, high negative impacts on agricultural output (elasticities range between -2.49 and -2.66), accounting for both land use change and rural-urban migration, and GDP per capita is the most powerful determinant in both sectors. The results indicate that environmental quality in the Nigerian economy has a measurable and a double-edged nature in the agricultural sector while it is statistically unmeasurable in the industrial sector, which acts as a source of environmental pressure rather than a recipient. Policy implications include sector-oriented management: agricultural investment for climate-smart agriculture and implementing cleaner production technologies in industry and protecting agricultural land. The study offers long-run elasticity estimates treating environmental quality as explanatory rather than an outcome in Nigerian sectoral output models.
Keywords
Environmental quality, Agricultural output, Industrial output, Ecological footprint, CO2 emissions
Downloads
References
1. Acheampong, A. O., Dzator, J., & Savage, D. A. (2021). Renewable energy, CO2 emissions and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa: Does institutional quality matter? Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(5), 1070-1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2021.03.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. AL-Marshadi, A. H., Aslam, M., & Janjua, A. A. (2025). Ecological footprints, global sustainability, and the roles of natural resources, financial development, and economic growth. PLoS ONE, 20(3), e0317664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bajja, S., Sackitey, G., Fumey, M. P., Amouzay, H., & El Ghini, A. (2026). Agricultural productivity and climate change vulnerability in West Africa: The role of technological innovation and carbon reduction strategies for sustainable agriculture. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., Gyamfi, B. A., & Ampomah, A. B. (2021). The environmental aspects of conventional and clean energy policy in sub-Saharan Africa: Is N-shaped hypothesis valid? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 66695-66708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14951-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Ampon-Wireko, S. (2023). The impact of agriculture production and renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions in developing countries: The role of governance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(53), 113804-113819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30178-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Destek, M. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2483-2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Destek, M. A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ehigiamusoe, K. U., Lean, H. H., & Somasundram, S. (2024). Analysis of the environmental impacts of the agricultural, industrial, and financial sectors in Malaysia. Energy & Environment, 35(5), 2329-2356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X231158774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gold, K. L., & Anagun, A. M. (2026). Climate change, macroeconomic stability, institutions, and sectoral resilience in Nigeria's agriculture and industry sectors. Discover Sustainability, 7(1), Article 447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02852-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (NBER Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Khan, U., & Khan, A. M. (2026). Growth at what cost? Energy use, investment, and emissions in the Saudi economy. Economies, 14(6), Article 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14060208 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Makieu, P., Turay, A. S., Yansaneh, M., Vampelt, M., Newah, S. S., Kamara, F. D., & Isaya, M. M. (2026). Climate-smart agriculture and carbon emissions: Panel data evidence on policy effectiveness in Sub-Saharan Africa (2000-2024). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 16(5), 394-411. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i55446 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nathaniel, S. P., & Bekun, F. V. (2020). Environmental management amidst energy use, urbanization, trade openness, and deforestation: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), e2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2037 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Obekpa, H. O., Alola, A. A., Adejo, A. M., & Echebiri, C. (2025). Examining the drivers of ecological footprint components: Is pursuing food security environmentally costly for Nigeria? Ecological Indicators. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. OECD. (2011). Towards green growth: Monitoring progress. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111318-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00013.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (World Employment Programme Research Working Paper No. 238). International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Parveen, S., Khan, S., Kamal, M. A., Abbas, M. A., Aijaz Syed, A., & Grima, S. (2023). The influence of industrial output, financial development, and renewable and non-renewable energy on environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries. Sustainability, 15(6), 4742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. Review of Economic Studies, 57(1), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Said, R., Bhatti, M. I., & Hunjra, A. I. (2022). Toward understanding renewable energy and sustainable development in developing and developed economies: A review. Energies, 15(15), 5349. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155349 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Sibuea, M. B., Sibuea, S. R., & Pratama, I. (2021). The impact of renewable energy and economic development on environmental quality of ASEAN countries. AgBioForum, 23(1), 12-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61(4), 783-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. UNEP. (2011). UNEP year book 2011: Emerging issues in our global environment. UNEP/Earthprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Wu, J., Yu, H., Cao, N., Zhang, J., Khan, J., & Lee, D. (2025). Ecological footprint analysis as a tool for advancing sustainable development goals (SDGs): Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 176, Article 113653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113653 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Zaman, S., uz Zaman, Q., Zhang, L., Wang, Z., & Jehan, N. (2022). Interaction between agricultural production, female employment, renewable energy, and environmental quality: Policy directions in context of developing economies. Renewable Energy, 186, 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Green Human Resource Management and Circular Economy- A Theoretical Review
- The Influence of Service Quality and Local Wisdom on Customer Loyalty in Retail Companies Mediated by Customer Relationship Management
- A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Special Economic Zone Units on the Basis of Employment Generation in Kerala
- Alternative Estimation Techniques for Mitigating Multicollinearity in Macroeconomic Models of Nigerian Economic Growth
- Sustainable and Innovative Framework: Circular Design & Economy Approach for New Product Development