The Effect of Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure Quality on Tobin’s Q of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria
Authors
Al -Ansar University, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Accounting, University of Abuja, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150700058
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 15/7 | Page No: 702-721
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-31
Accepted: 2026-08-05
Published: 2026-08-12
Abstract
This study examines the effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure quality on Tobin’s Q of listed deposit money banks (DMBs) in Nigeria over the period 2014-2024. Departing from the quantity-based indices that dominate the emerging-market literature, the study operationalizes disclosure quality through a bespoke Integrated Disclosure Quality Classification (IDQC) framework that scores forty-five GRI banking-sector indicators along four weighted dimensions: content coverage (25%), information quality (35%), presentation format (20%) and verification and assurance (20%). Content analysis of the annual reports, integrated reports and standalone sustainability reports of eleven continuously listed DMBs yields a balanced panel of 121 bank-year observations, from which a composite Weighted Disclosure Quality Index (WDQI) and three pillar indices (EDQI, SDQI, GDQI) are constructed. After establishing stationarity (CIPS), cointegration (Westerlund) and cross-sectional dependence (Pesaran CD), the dynamic relationship is estimated using a two-step System GMM estimator with Windmeijer-corrected standard errors. The composite WDQI exerts a positive and statistically significant effect on Tobin’s Q (β = 0.0028, p < 0.05). Pillar decomposition shows that this effect is driven by governance disclosure quality (β = 0.0020, p < 0.05) and social disclosure quality (β = 0.0015, p < 0.10), while environmental disclosure quality is statistically insignificant (β = 0.0012). Post-estimation diagnostics confirm specification validity (AR(2) p = 0.62; Hansen J p = 0.28; VIF < 3), and fixed-effects OLS and Pooled Mean Group ARDL(1,1) estimators corroborate the direction of the relationship. Interpreted through Stakeholder and Signaling theories, the findings indicate that the Nigerian market prices the credibility and decision-usefulness of ESG reporting rather than its volume, but does not yet price environmental disclosure. The study recommends accelerated adoption of ISSB-aligned standards, mandatory independent assurance of sustainability reports, and the publication of a sectoral disclosure-quality league table by the Central Bank of Nigeria.
Keywords
ESG disclosure quality; Tobin’s Q; firm value; deposit money banks; System GMM; Nigeria
Downloads
References
1. Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(4), 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-08-2017-0079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anyadufu, A. C., & Orajekwe, J. C. (2023). Web-based environmental disclosure and firm value of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Global Accounting, 9(2), 110-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S119-S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Beattie, V., & Thomson, S. J. (2007). Lifting the lid on the use of content analysis to investigate intellectual capital disclosures. Accounting Forum, 31(2), 129-163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Beretta, S., & Bozzolan, S. (2008). Quality versus quantity: The case of forward-looking disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(3), 333-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0802300304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036-1071. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(1), 98-115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Central Bank of Nigeria. (2012). Nigerian sustainable banking principles. Central Bank of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s Q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Cruz, L. B., de Lima, E. P., & de Jesus, L. C. (2024). Environmental disclosure and banking sector lending practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118-132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Edemeka, K. (2024). Research methodology in accounting research: Approaches and applications. Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, 24(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. El-Deeb, M. S., Ismail, T. H., & El Banna, A. A. (2023). Does audit quality moderate the impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on firm value? Further evidence from Egypt. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 5(4), 293-322. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Emeka-Nwokeji, N. A., & Osisioma, B. C. (2019). Sustainability disclosures and market value of firms in emerging economy: Evidence from Nigeria. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 7(3), 1-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Etim, R. S., Owan, V. O., & Effiong, C. E. (2023). Sustainability reporting and financial performance of listed firms in Nigeria: The moderating role of firm size. International Journal of Financial Research, 14(1), 67-82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Fang, Z., & Guo, Y. (2025). ESG disclosure as a signaling mechanism: Evidence from listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432, Article 140789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. (2024). Roadmap for the adoption of ISSB standards in Nigeria. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Gerged, A. M. (2021). Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 609-629. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Global Reporting Initiative. (2025). GRI sector standards project for financial services: Banking (Exposure Draft). Global Reporting Initiative. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Guo, J., Li, C., & Jiao, W. (2024). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market value: The mediating role of investor attention. Finance Research Letters, 67(Part A). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105863 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029-1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Harun, M. S., Hussainey, K., Kharuddin, K. A. M., & Al Farooque, O. (2020). CSR disclosure, corporate governance and firm value: A study on GCC Islamic banks. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 28(4), 607-638. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2019-0103 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. IFRS Foundation. (2024). IFRS S1 General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information and IFRS S2 Climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9), 834-864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/258852 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Kumar, V., Prakash, A., & Kumar, N. (2024). Sustainability disclosure quality in Indian banks: A comprehensive assessment. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 42(3), 567-589. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Latipatul-Hamdah, A., Pratama, I., & Adiwijaya, A. (2025). ESG disclosure quality and firm value: Evidence from ASEAN banking. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 12(3), 1123-1136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 60-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. The Journal of Business, 54(1), 1-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305-325. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Mechta, A., Hamidat, S., & Bourafa, S. (2025). Sustainability disclosure quality: A multidimensional assessment framework. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 9(1), 23-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2023). The influence of Italian board characteristics on environmental, social and governance dimensions. Management Decision, 61, 3082-3105. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2022-1224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Modibbo, S. A. (2025). Effects of ESG practices on financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Morris, R. D. (1987). Signalling, agency theory and accounting policy choice. Accounting and Business Research, 18(69), 47-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Msomi, T. S., Mkhize, N., & Chipeta, C. (2025). ESG disclosure and firm value in emerging markets: A panel data analysis. Investment Analysts Journal, 54(1), 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417-1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Niu, F., Zhang, C., & Li, M. (2024). Social disclosure and bank risk management: Evidence from Asia-Pacific. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 81, Article 102134. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Nkanga, E. N., Omoye, A. S., & Eragbhe, E. (2023). Sustainability reporting practices among Nigerian banks: Trends and drivers. Journal of Banking Regulation, 24(2), 198-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Nwaigwe, C. V., Akinyomi, O. J., & Olowookere, J. K. (2022). Sustainability reporting and firm value: Evidence from quoted companies in Nigeria. African Journal of Business Management, 16(8), 234-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Ojianwuna, A. C. (2024). ESG practices and firm performance: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(2), 445-467. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Okpala, K. E., & Iredele, O. (2018). Corporate social and environmental disclosures and market value of listed firms in Nigeria. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(4), 73-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Onobruke, O. O., Ozordi, E., & Uwuigbe, U. (2025). Audit quality, risk management and market value: Evidence from Nigerian deposit money banks. Managerial Auditing Journal, 40(3), 678-701. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Onwere, C. (2024). Environment, social and governance practices and firm value in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Economic Policy, 31(2), 1-24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Orisakwe-Lawrence, O. N. (2023). Voluntary environmental disclosure and firm value: Evidence from quoted financial services companies in Nigeria. The International Journal of Accounting, 58(2), 225-248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. Pacheco, I., & Branco, M. C. (2025). Corporate social responsibility disclosure quality in the banking sector. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(1), 78-102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Pangaribuan, H., & Sudana, I. M. (2025). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and firm value: Evidence from Indonesian mining sector firms. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), Article 2456789. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435). University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/2670182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336-361. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Samuel, A. D., & Akinyosoye, O. M. (2025). ESG reporting and firm performance: Evidence from Nigerian listed companies. African Journal of Business Management, 19(3), 78-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. Terkuma, K. P., & Aga, S. (2024). Effect of environmental, social and governance disclosures on market value of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Finance Review, 16(1), 56-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1991374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. van Beest, F., Braam, G., & Boelens, S. (2009). Quality of financial reporting: Measuring qualitative characteristics (NiCE Working Paper 09-108). Nijmegen Center for Economics, Radboud University Nijmegen. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. Weber, O. (2012). Environmental credit risk management in banks and financial service providers. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2(1), 76-95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581-606. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Yu, E. P. Y., Guo, C. Q., & Luu, B. V. (2018). Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 987-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]