The Value Relevance of Recognized Intangible Assets and Market Value Added of Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria
Authors
Department of Accounting, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Accounting, Bayero University Kano, Kano State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Accounting, Bayero University Kano, Kano State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900074
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 15/9 | Page No: 1954-1963
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-23
Accepted: 2026-09-28
Published: 2026-10-13
Abstract
This study examines whether recognized intangible assets are value-relevant to the market valuation of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. The study adopts an ex-post facto panel research design and uses secondary data from the audited annual reports of 13 sampled listed deposit money banks for 2015–2024, producing 130 bank-year observations. The study is anchored principally on the Ohlson (1995) equity valuation framework and complemented by the Resource-Based View and Signaling Theory. Recognized intangible assets are measured as the natural logarithm of total recognized intangible assets, while Market Value Added (MVA) is measured as market capitalization less book value of equity. Bank size and leverage are included as control variables. Based on the regression estimates supplied for the study, the Hausman specification test does not reject the random-effects specification (χ² = 2.6133, p = 0.4552). The random-effects estimates show a positive and statistically significant association between recognized intangible assets and MVA (β = 3.1850, p < 0.001). Bank size is negatively associated with MVA (β = −2.7142, p < 0.001), whereas leverage is positively associated with MVA (β = 6.8551, p = 0.0003). The model explains approximately 60.24% of the variation in MVA (R² = 0.6024). The findings indicate that recognized intangible assets contain information associated with equity-market valuation in the sampled Nigerian banks. The results should, however, be interpreted as conditional statistical associations rather than evidence of causality. The study recommends clearer and more consistent reporting of recognized intangible assets and related accounting policies, while recognizing that IAS 38 places important limits on the recognition of internally generated intangible resources.
Keywords
Recognized Intangible Assets; Market Value Added; Value Relevance; Deposit Money Banks; Ohlson Model; Panel Data.
Downloads
References
1. Abubakar, S., & Abubakar, M. (2015). Intangible assets and value relevance of accounting information of listed high-tech firms in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(11), 60–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1–3), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. International Accounting Standards Board. (2023). IAS 38: Intangible Assets. IFRS Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Oryina, E., & Suleiman, S. (2020). Effect of intangible assets on value relevance: Evidence from listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Economics and Sustainability, 2(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.32890/jes2020.2.2.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Inseng, D. H., & Uford, I. C. (2019). Examining contributions of customer-based and employeebasedbrand equity to a retail bank’s market performance using resource-based theory. The retail and marketing review, 15(1), 27-38 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Utami, H. & Alamanos, E. (2023) resource-based theory: a review. In s. Papagiannidis ed,theory hub book. Available at https://open.ncl.ac.uk / isbn: 9781739604400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Widiantoro, D. M. (2012). Measuring the impact of intangible asset investment toward company financial healthand company agency problem: empirical research from indonesian. Journal of finance and risk perspectives, 1(2), 1-24. Retrievedfrom http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2078900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Abdul-Shukor, Z., Ibrahim, M., & Kaur, J. (2008). The value relevance of intangibles non-Current assets in different economic conditions. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 316-337. http://doi.org/10.1080/14613800902924474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Akpan Dorathy Christopher (2020), Intangible Assets Disclosures and Market Value Added Of ICT Firms in Nigeria, a Phd thesis. Akwa ibom state university [Google Scholar] [Crossref]