The Nexus of Tech-Enabled Financial Disruptions, Internet Plus Policy, Business Climate Uncertainty, and ESG Performance in China: Evidence from a Sys-GMM Approach

Rapid integration of technology-driven solutions has transformed corporate strategies in the quest for effective sustainability frameworks. The study provides a robust theoretical foundation for understanding financial digitalization and ESG dynamics within policy frameworks and the complexities of the business environment using a panel dataset of listed financial institutions in China from 2012 to 2023, employing a two-step system-GMM approach. The results reveal a significant positive relationship between tech-enabled financial disruptions and ESG performance, implying that tech-enabled solutions in the financial sector enhance sustainability outcomes. Furthermore, the internet plus policy strengthens this relationship by fostering a supportive digital ecosystem, while business climate uncertainty negatively influences it, underscoring the detrimental effects of regulatory and economic unpredictability on ESG commitments. These insights hold important implications for policymakers and corporate executives in leveraging financial digitalization to optimize ESG performance, strengthen digital policies, and overall sustainability while balancing risk management to encourage long-term sustainable investments.

Tech-enabled Financial Disruptions, ESG Performance, Internet Plus Policy; Business Climate Uncertainty; Sustainability.

1. Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2016). The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 27, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2015.12.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al‐Thaqeb, S. A., Algharabali, B. G., & Alabdulghafour, K. T. (2022). The pandemic and economic policy uncertainty. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 2784–2794. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and RegTech in a Nutshell, and the Future in a Sandbox. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3088303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arun, T., Girardone, C., & Piserà, S. (2022). ESG issues in emerging markets and the role of banks. In D. Nguyen (Ed.), Handbook of Banking and Finance in Emerging Markets (pp. 321–344). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800880900.00025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013520265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ben Bouheni, F. (2014). Banking regulation and supervision: Can it enhance stability in Europe? Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 6(3), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-11-2013-0059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Berg, T. O. (2019). Business uncertainty and the effectiveness of fiscal policy in Germany. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23(4), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100517000281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bin‐Feng, C., Mirza, S. S., Ahsan, T., & Qureshi, M. A. (2024). How uncertainty can determine corporate ESG performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2290–2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bloom, N. (2014). Fluctuations in Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 153–176. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.153 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bloom, N., Bond, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics. Review of Economic Studies, 74(2), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00426.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101941 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Brogi, M., & Lagasio, V. (2019). Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Cabaleiro-Cerviño, G., & Mendi, P. (2024). ESG-driven innovation strategy and firm performance. Eurasian Business Review, 14(1), 137–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-024-00254-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Chan, C.-Y., Chou, D.-W., & Lo, H.-C. (2017). Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 39, 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2016.10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Chen, C.-L., Lin, Y.-C., Chen, W.-H., Chao, C.-F., & Pandia, H. (2021). Role of Government to Enhance Digital Transformation in Small Service Business. Sustainability, 13(3), 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Chen, Y., & Hassink, R. (2022). The geography of the emergence of online peer-to-peer lending platforms in China: An evolutionary economic geography perspective. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(2), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1879664 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Chen, Y., & Ren, J. (2025). How does digital transformation improve ESG performance? Empirical research from 396 enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01011-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Cui, J. (2022). Research on the Impact of Digital Finance Development on ESG Performance of Enterprises. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2022.041120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Deng, X., Li, W., & Ren, X. (2023). More sustainable, more productive: Evidence from ESG ratings and total factor productivity among listed Chinese firms. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103439 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Eckert, E., & Kovalevska, O. (2021). Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the Discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Fang, M., Nie, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Can enterprise digitization improve ESG performance? Economic Modelling, 118, 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Farooq, O., Jabbouri, I., & Naili, M. (2024). The nexus between economic policy uncertainty and access to finance: A study of developing countries. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 20(1), 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-11-2022-0507 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Flammer, C. (2015). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Superior Financial Performance? A Regression Discontinuity Approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Flammer, C., & Bansal, P. (2017). Does a long‐term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1827–1847. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2017). Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation: How Far Have We Come, and Where Should We Go? Journal of Management, 43(1), 200–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2005). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management (1st ed., pp. 183–201). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.00007.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., & Kim, Y. (2017). Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 360–385. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Guan, J., Xu, H., Huo, D., Hua, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101542 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2015). Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment. Review of Financial Studies, hhv050. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Gupta, R., Pal, S. K., & Muttoo, S. K. (2020). Data Analytics for Better Branding of E-Governance and E-Business Systems: Case of “Digital India” Campaign. In N. Vij Mali (Ed.), Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development (pp. 51–78). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5412-7.ch003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Gupta, S. K., Tiwari, S., Hassan, A., & Gupta, P. (2023). Moderating Effect of Technologies into Behavioural Intensions of Tourists toward Use of Mobile Wallets for Digital Payments: TAM Model Perspective. International Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Systems, 16(1), 43–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Hamdi, K., Guenich, H., & Ben Saada, M. (2022). Does corporate financial performance promote ESG: Evidence from US firms. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2154053. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2154053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Hashmi, S. M., Chang, B. H., Huang, L., & Uche, E. (2022). Revisiting the relationship between oil prices, exchange rate, and stock prices: An application of quantile ARDL model. Resources Policy, 75, 102543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. He, J., & Su, H. (2022). Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. He, W., Zhang, W., & Wang, C. (2020). Strategic Updating of Internet Plus Considering Digital Transformation. Chinese Journal of Engineering Science, 22(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.04.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Hoang, A., Nguyen, D. T., & Le, P. U. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from emerging countries. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2375625. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2375625 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Hong, Y. (2017). Pivot to Internet Plus: Molding China’s Digital Economy for Economic Restructuring? International Journal of Communication, 11, 1486–1506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Hristov, K. (2017). Internet plus policy: A study on how China can achieve economic growth through the internet of things. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2017-0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya’s Mobile Money Revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. In K. Brunner (Ed.), Economics Social Institutions (Vol. 1, pp. 163–231). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Jiang, W., Wu, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Does digitization drive corporate social responsibility? International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Kashif, M., Pinglu, C., Ullah, S., & Zaman, M. (2024). Evaluating the influence of financial technology (FinTech) on sustainable finance: A comprehensive global analysis. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 38(1), 123–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-023-00439-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Koapaha, H. P. (2023). The Impact of Net Interest Income and ESG on Bank Performance. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 3(2), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v3i2.3961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Li, W., & Pang, W. (2023). The impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance: Based on the perspective of corporate green technology innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(24), 65314–65327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27057-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2024). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Green Innovation. Information Systems and Economics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23977/infse.2024.050123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Li, Y., Yin, F., & Nie, Y. (2019). Economic Impact of the Internet Plus Era: A Case Study of Shanghai. WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/11049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Liu, H., Wu, K., & Zhou, Q. (2022). Whether and How ESG Impacts on Corporate Financial Performance in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Sustainability, 14(24), 16584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416584 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Manupati, V. K., Schoenherr, T., Ramkumar, M., Wagner, S. M., Pabba, S. K., & Inder Raj Singh, R. (2020). A blockchain-based approach for a multi-echelon sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2222–2241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1683248 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Mão-de-Ferro, A., & Ramelli, S. (2022). Inflation, the Corporate Greed Narrative, and the Value of Corporate Social Responsibility. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308164 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Mhlanga, D. (2022). Digital Financial Inclusion, and the Way Forward for Emerging Markets: Towards Sustainable Development. In D. Mhlanga, Digital Financial Inclusion (pp. 323–341). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16687-7_18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Moudud-Ul-Huq, S., & Akter, R. (2024). Impacts of economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and institutional quality (IQ) on bank risk-taking behavior. Kybernetes, 53(3), 1148–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2022-1004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Mu, W., Liu, K., Tao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2011). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability. Business & Society, 50(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. Ozili, P. K., & Iorember, P. T. (2023). Financial stability and sustainable development. International Journal of Finance & Economics, ijfe.2803. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Patil, P. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2017). Digital Payments Adoption: An Analysis of Literature. In A. K. Kar, P. V. Ilavarasan, M. P. Gupta, Y. K. Dwivedi, M. Mäntymäki, M. Janssen, A. Simintiras, & S. Al-Sharhan (Eds.), Digital Nations – Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability (Vol. 10595, pp. 61–70). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Radziwill, N. (2018). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World.: 2016. Dan Tapscott and Alex Tapscott. New York: Penguin Random House. 348 pages. Quality Management Journal, 25(1), 64–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2018.1404373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. Ren, X., Zeng, G., & Zhao, Y. (2023). Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 79, 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

80. Ringim, S. H., & Güngör, H. (2024). The Impact of United States Economic Policy Uncertainty on Financial Stability in BRICS Economies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

81. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (Fifth edition). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

82. Roodman, D. (2009). A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments *. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00542.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

83. Sam, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Srinivasan, J. (2021). Cashlessness in India: Vision, policy and practices. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102169 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

84. Schmidt, C., & Krimmer, R. (2022). How to implement the European digital single market: Identifying the catalyst for digital transformation. Journal of European Integration, 44(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.2011267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

85. Schmidthuber, L., Maresch, D., & Ginner, M. (2020). Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector—Toward a refined technology acceptance model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

86. Scholz, R. W., Czichos, R., Parycek, P., & Lampoltshammer, T. J. (2020). Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(2), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

87. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (Fourth edition). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

88. Shabir, M., Jiang, P., Bakhsh, S., & Zhao, Z. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and bank stability: Threshold effect of institutional quality and competition. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

89. Shang, Y., Raza, S. A., Huo, Z., Shahzad, U., & Zhao, X. (2023). Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to the carbon emission reduction? Micro-level evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.02.019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

90. Shao, H., Zhou, B., Wang, D., & An, Z. (2024). Navigating Uncertainty: The Micro-Level Dynamics of Economic Policy Uncertainty and Systemic Financial Risk in China’s Financial Institutions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01730-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

91. Su, X., Wang, S., & Li, F. (2023). The Impact of Digital Transformation on ESG Performance Based on the Mediating Effect of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability, 15(18), 13506. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

92. Trinh, H. H. (2024). Climate Finance, Policy Uncertainty, and Global Financial Stability: A Systematic Review Through Bibliometric Analysis. In S. Boubaker & M. Elnahass, Transformations in Banking, Finance and Regulation (Vol. 09, pp. 209–225). WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE). https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800614291_0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

93. Ullah, S., Hussain, S. I., Nabi, A. A., & Mubashir, K. A. (2022). Role of Regulatory Governance in Financial Stability: A Comparison of High and Low Income Countries. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 11(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2022-0009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

94. Ullah, S., Ullah, A., & Zaman, M. (2024). Nexus of governance, macroeconomic conditions, and financial stability of banks: A comparison of developed and emerging countries. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00542-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

95. Verbeke, A., & Tung, V. (2013). The Future of Stakeholder Management Theory: A Temporal Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1276-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

96. Wang, C., Wang, H., Bai, Y., Shan, J., Nie, P., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impact of climate policy uncertainty on corporate pollution Emissions——Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 363, 121426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

97. Wang, J., Song, Z., & Xue, L. (2023). Digital Technology for Good: Path and Influence—Based on the Study of ESG Performance of Listed Companies in China. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 2862. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052862 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

98. Wang, L., & Hou, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation and earnings management on ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 783. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48636-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

99. Wang, L., & Yang, H. (2024). Digital technology innovation and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(6), 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09791-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

100. Wang, M., Liu, T., & Zhou, W. (2023). Internet Plus, Industrial Transformation, and China’s Evolving Urban System. Journal of Urban Technology, 30(5), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2254203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

101. Wu, S., & Li, Y. (2023). A Study on the Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate ESG Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation. Sustainability, 15(8), 6568. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

102. Xue, L., Dong, J., & Zha, Y. (2023). How does digital finance affect firm environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance? — Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Heliyon, 9(10), e20800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

103. Yang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Digital Financial Inclusion and Sustainable Growth of Small and Micro Enterprises—Evidence Based on China’s New Third Board Market Listed Companies. Sustainability, 12(9), 3733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093733 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

104. Yang, P., Hao, X., Wang, L., Zhang, S., & Yang, L. (2024). Moving toward sustainable development: The influence of digital transformation on corporate ESG performance. Kybernetes, 53(2), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2023-0521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

105. Yijing, G. (2023). The Impact of “Internet plus” on the Economic Management of Modern Enterprises. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 5(15), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051519 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

106. Yin, S., Jiang, M., Chen, L., & Jia, F. (2024). Digital transformation and the circular economy: An institutional theory perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(4), 1627–1655. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2023-0792 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

107. Zhang, C., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024). Effect of digital inclusive finance on common prosperity and the underlying mechanisms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

108. Zhao, X., & Cai, L. (2023). Digital transformation and corporate ESG: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

109. Zhao, Z., Xiong, W., & Fang, J. (2016). Impact of Internet plus to China Economy Development. Modern Economy, 07(09), 933–944. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.79096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

110. Zhavoronok, A., Shchur, R., Zhezherun, Y., Sadchykova, I., Viadrova, N., & Tychkovska, L. (2022). The Role of the Credit Services Market in Ensuring Stability of the Banking System. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 12(6), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.120602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

111. Zhu, J. (2022). E-commerce on International Economic and Trade Under the Internet Plus Background. In M. Atiquzzaman, N. Yen, & Z. Xu (Eds.), 2021 International Conference on Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City (Vol. 103, pp. 757–765). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7469-3_84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

112. Zyznarska-Dworczak, B. (2022). Financial and ESG reporting in times of uncertainty. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 46(4), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessing Environmental Support as a Predictor of Occupational Engagement among Women Entrepreneurs in Delta Districts
• Permeability Characteristics of Lower Niger Floodplain Sediments and their Implications for Drainage and Flood Mitigation
• Investigating Atmospheric Metal Pollution in Khartoum North (Bahri), Sudan Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy
• Corrosion Monitoring and Predictive Modelling of Gas Processing Pipelines in Ghana and Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence Gaps and a Research Agenda